Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Nils Philippsen wrote: > ... >> I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if >> one of your packages is affected or not. > ... >> iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev > > Thank you for the list. > > I have just tried to build i

Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Denys Vlasenko
I installed F16 on a new machine, trying to keep the installation more or less lean. Meaning - not installing tons of packages w/o thinking and ending up with tons of installed stuff I don't even know what it is. Today, I'm looking at my process list, sorted by amount of dirtied pages (which very

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 01/03/2012 01:32 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I installed F16 on a new machine, trying to keep the installation > more or less lean. Meaning - not installing tons of packages w/o > thinking and ending up with tons of installed stuff I don't even know > what it is. > > Today, I'm looking at my pr

Re: fedpkg push with non-default id_rsa.pub

2012-01-03 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-01-02, Neal Becker wrote: > > HOST *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.fedorahosted.org IdentityFile > ~/.ssh/id_rsa.fedora > > So wonder why I got 'permission denied'. > > fedpkg ci -p -m 'update to 2.0.2' > Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly >

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:03:44 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > The tested version (the one in rawhide) is iwhd-1.1, > while the latest is 1.2 (which is in F16). Shame on me > for not putting the latest also in rawhide. If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one - Rawhide aut

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Peter Robinson
2012/1/3 Pádraig Brady : > On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Nils Philippsen wrote: >> ... >>> I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if >>> one of your packages is affected or not. >> ... >>> iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev >> >> Thank you for the list.

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On 01/03/2012 02:57 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Just a comment on the accuracy of the numbers. # ps_mem.py¹ | grep tracker 3.2 MiB + 730.5 KiB = 3.9 MiB tracker-miner-fs 3.9 MiB + 722.5 KiB = 4.6 MiB tracker-miner-flickr 5.5 MiB + 549.0 KiB = 6.0 MiB tracker-store

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Denis Arnaud
Hi Jim, 2012/1/3 > > Is there some sort of reminder service that could be configured to nag the > maintainers of a package in a situation like this? Personally, I would > appreciate it, and I think Fedora would benefit if we could do something to > minimize reverse-version skew between Fedora-la

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > > I have just tried to build iwhd on F16 using a pretty recent gcc-4.7.x > (built manually: 4.7.0 20111202), and it worked fine, so I'm not quite > sure why iwhd is on the list. Maybe the gcc-4.7.x that Jakub used > lacks something t

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/03/2012 09:16 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > # cat /proc/meminfo >/tmp/1; killall tracker-store; sleep 1; cat > /proc/meminfo >/tmp/2; cat /tmp/1 /tmp/2 | grep MemFree > MemFree: 1940372 kB > MemFree: 1963860 kB > > As you see, killing it on my machine freed over 23 megs worth

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/03/2012 04:15 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: As far as I know tracker is a feature of Gnome 3 - there may be a way to turn it off tho it may need a gnome registry tweak ... Open up a terminal as an regular user and run gnome-session-properties you can disable it there. JBG -- devel mail

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:15 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 01/03/2012 09:16 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > # cat /proc/meminfo >/tmp/1; killall tracker-store; sleep 1; cat > > /proc/meminfo >/tmp/2; cat /tmp/1 /tmp/2 | grep MemFree > > MemFree: 1940372 kB > > MemFree: 1963860

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > In my opinion, a "search tool and indexer", even if it brands itself > "a powerful desktop-neutral first class object database", has no valid > technical reasons to run on the machine all the time, even at times when > nothing is usi

Re: gsmartcontrol, gparted problems with userhelper and X credentials?

2012-01-03 Thread Adam Jackson
On 12/23/11 5:14 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I wrote: > Now if I try to launch gsmartcontrol from the Gnome Shell, I get > the prompt from userhelper for my password, but it fails to run. > From the command line, the same thing happens, but at least it > shows the error message "Gtk-WARNING **: can

[dspam/el5] revert logrotate changes

2012-01-03 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit f247599176cf236330f3117e8848d0f4b9b6b98e Author: Nathanael D. Noblet Date: Tue Jan 3 10:31:18 2012 -0700 revert logrotate changes dspam-logrotate |1 - dspam.spec |5 - 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam-logrotate b/dspam-logrot

Re: gsmartcontrol, gparted problems with userhelper and X credentials?

2012-01-03 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 12/23/11 5:14 AM, Eric Smith wrote: > > I wrote: > > > Now if I try to launch gsmartcontrol from the Gnome Shell, I get > > > the prompt from userhelper for my password, but it fails to run. > > > From the command line, the same thing h

[dspam/el6] revert logrotate change

2012-01-03 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit d28437979e438138d9cb8dc0fe44685e74a17324 Author: Nathanael D. Noblet Date: Tue Jan 3 10:49:43 2012 -0700 revert logrotate change dspam-logrotate |1 - dspam.spec |5 - 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam-logrotate b/dspam-logrota

Re: gsmartcontrol, gparted problems with userhelper and X credentials?

2012-01-03 Thread Adam Jackson
On 1/3/12 12:49 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: You moved between networks, which caused your hostname to change [1]. [..] [1] - This is debateably correct. Sorry I can't resist saying that changing hostname automatically after boot is *always* a

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread mike cloaked
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> In my opinion, a "search tool and indexer", even if it brands itself >> "a powerful desktop-neutral first class object database", has no valid >> technical reasons to run on the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2012-01-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 23:08 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > (download via git clone > http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-misc.git/ ) Move to its own repo on: http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-active-user.git/ Mirrored on github at: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user Pierre

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread mike cloaked
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >>> In my opinion, a "search tool and indexer", even if it brands itself >>> "a powerful desktop-neutral first class object

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> I have just tried to build iwhd on F16 using a pretty recent gcc-4.7.x >> (built manually: 4.7.0 20111202), and it worked fine, so I'm not quite >> sure why iwhd is on the list. Maybe the gcc-4.7.x that Jaku

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > I also discovered that three different tracker processes were running > in my xfce desktop!  However since I don't see a need for them for me, > nor do I want them, it was relatively easy to prevent them from > executing on desktop startup by g

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:50 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > I think tracker can be turned off centrally for KDE and XFCE by going to > > /etc/xdg/autostart/tracker-store.desktop > > Find the line: > OnlyShowIn=GNOME;KDE;XFCE; > > Remove the KDE and XFCE bits. > > Similar for the other two tracker files

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Denis Arnaud wrote: > Hi Jim, > > 2012/1/3 > > Is there some sort of reminder service that could be configured to nag the > maintainers of a package in a situation like this? Personally, I would > appreciate it, and I think Fedora would benefit if we could do something > to > mini

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 01/03/2012 02:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: I feel like I'm the only Fedora user on the planet who actually does like desktop search. I love that I can press ALT+F2 and play a movie or e-mail somebody just as easily as I've always opened programs from there. IMHO, it beats trawling throug

Re: Bad package selection practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Joel Rees
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:00 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote: >> I also discovered that three different tracker processes were running >> in my xfce desktop!  However since I don't see a need for them for me, >> nor do I want them, it was relative

Re: broken dependencies for fawkes-plugin-player

2012-01-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote: > > > >> fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but > >> geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so > > > > It has been reported

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:06 +, mike cloaked wrote: > I also discovered that three different tracker processes were running > in my xfce desktop! However since I don't see a need for them for me, > nor do I want them, it was relatively easy to prevent them from > executing on desktop startup b

Re: Bad package selection practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 09:52 +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > I think the error here is less in the coding in packages than in the > design of the default system specifications, specifically the package > selection. > > The errors gnome has committed would seem to be off-topic here, unless > the Fedora c

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 01/03/2012 02:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: >> >> I feel like I'm the only Fedora user on the planet who actually does >> like desktop search.  I love that I can press ALT+F2 and play a movie >> or e-mail somebody just as easily as

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 19:39 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > On 01/03/2012 02:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > >> > >> I feel like I'm the only Fedora user on the planet who actually does > >> like desktop search. I love that I ca

Re: Bad package selection practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-03 Thread Joel Rees
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 09:52 +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > >> I think the error here is less in the coding in packages than in the >> design of the default system specifications, specifically the package >> selection. >> >> The errors gnome has