Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th package list) using
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also
rebuilt the same package with gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16 to quickly remove from the
list packa
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:02:33AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> has anybody else noticed this the last time?
>
> i get this permanently in test-guests with F16/F17 while
> the re-labeled 2.6.41 from F15 has no problems
>
> all the loaded modules are from upstream-kernel (vmxnet3, pvscsi...)
> an
Am 31.12.2011 14:48, schrieb Neil Horman:
> Yup, I see the problem. The msi irq sysfs objects that are allocated in
> populate_msi_sysfs are getting kobject_put in free_msi_irqs, even in the case
> an
> error path is encountered and the allocation/creation fails. Please open a bz
> with the ab
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th pac
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
a few gcj/objc dependent packages not strictly required). We still have
lots of *.fc15,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 16:35:00 +0100,
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
>
> IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
> a few gcj/objc
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
>
> IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
> a few gcj/objc dependent p
On 2011-12-31 13:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64
Is this package available somewhere?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
=?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU2t5dHTDpA==?= writes:
> On 2011-12-31 13:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64
> Is this package available somewhere?
It'd be a lot easier for packagers to work on fixing their packages for
it if there were a build available for F16.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 04:25:06PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
> >
> > IMHO a mass rebuild is
El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:35:00 +0100
Jakub Jelinek escribió:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it
> > next week.
>
> IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
> a few gcj/objc
On 12/27/2011 10:55 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14436/geos-3.3.1-1.fc16
And an arguable abuse of the process, a submitter setting karma: 1 and then
giving their own update the requisite karma++ to get it pushed to stable
almost immediately. :(
-- re
12 matches
Mail list logo
