Compose started at Mon Dec 12 08:15:39 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766588
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor:
3650906917d824582ad82e1bd974da45 Class-XSAccessor-1.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
commit a79dac1ae94db11bd56474e9db9d7ac06145a9c3
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:02:16 2011 +0100
1.13 bump
Also remove wrong Obsolete: perl(Class::XSAccessor::Array) tag.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec | 29 -
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Init =
#topic Welcome new FESCo members
= Followups =
#topic #
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:56 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires sweeper >= 0:4.7.90
> 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires superkaramba >=
> 0:4.7.90
> 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires kremotecontrol >=
> 0:4.7.90
> 6:kdeutils
On 12/09/2011 10:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
>
>> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
>> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
>
> The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2011 01:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Paul F. Johnson" writes:
>> /var/log/mysqld.log shows this
>
>> 111211 20:48:32 [ERROR] /usr/libexec/mysqld: Can't find file:
>> './mysql/proxies_priv.frm' (errno: 13) 111211 20:48:32 [ERROR]
>> Fatal error
Hi,
> > 111211 20:48:32 [ERROR] /usr/libexec/mysqld: Can't find file:
> > './mysql/proxies_priv.frm' (errno: 13)
> > 111211 20:48:32 [ERROR] Fatal error: Can't open and lock privilege
> > tables: Can't find file: './mysql/proxies_priv.frm' (errno: 13)
>
> I think the nearby suggestions to run mys
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 10:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> >
> >> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
> >> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
> >
>
On 12/12/2011 12:08 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> I like this one, since it seems to be the easiest solution from my POV.
>
> But I don't see necessary to solve conflicts using renaming library and
> header files. I'd rather just let compat-gdbm-devel and gdbm-devel
> sub-packages to conflict (use "C
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-12)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:01:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-12-12/fesco.2011-12-12-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
> 18:43:02)
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
be added to that list?
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
> > 18:43:02)
>
> There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
> extensions from being uplo
On 12/12/2011 08:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> To me, the easiest solution for you is probably going to be dropping ypserv
> from the distribution. But if that's not possible, then attempting to
> convince the gdbm upstream to switch back to GPLv2+ would likely be
> a worthwhile investment.
On
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
> allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
> additional exceptions as they arise.
.tgz is another common extension.
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
> > allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
> > additional exceptions as th
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
>> allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
>> additional exceptions as they ar
On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
> extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
> be added to that list?
Please don't do that. In my opinion the lookaside cache is the proper
place for patches for
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> > There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
> > extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
> > be added to that list?
>
> Please don't do that.
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
> > > 18:43:02)
> >
> > There was some di
On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>
>>> There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
>>> extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
>>>
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> > > wrote:
> > > > * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brains
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760472
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12
15:51:19 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.el5 has been submitted as an up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760472
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12
15:51:29 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760472
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12
15:51:37 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.fc16 has been submitted as an u
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:52 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
> Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > Patches should never be in the lookaside cache, because
> > it is very difficult to view them.
>
> IMO if that'd be a consideration, the lookaside cache shouldn't really
> exist
On 12/12/2011 04:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> So I think for me, lookaside isn't there to separate data from upstream from
> data generated by Fedora -- it's there to supplement the SCM when a file is
> not suitable for direct inclusion into the SCM.
I agree, and the tooling we're building into
On 12/12/2011 04:46 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 04:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> So I think for me, lookaside isn't there to separate data from upstream from
>> data generated by Fedora -- it's there to supplement the SCM when a file is
>> not suitable for direct inclusion into the S
Hi,
I've not got mysql working fine, but phpMyAdmin is moaning about mysqli
being missing. I've installed php-devel and php-mysql, but still it
moans. I can't see anything wrong in /etc/php.ini either.
Any clues?
Paul
--
Vertraue mir, ich weiss, was ich mache...
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759436
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On 12/12/2011 11:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> Patches should never be in the lookaside cache, because
>>> it is very difficult to view them.
>>
>> IMO if that'd be a considera
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:24 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >> Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
> >> allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> when you update ark, kcalc, kdf, kgpg, kwallet ,kfloppy, kremotecontrol
> and sweeper etc ?
When the new split packages passed review.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:15:25 +
> From: "Paul F. Johnson"
>
> Removed the entire mysql* rpms, installed fresh via yum, rm
> -rf /var/lib/mysql, enabled the service, did the mysql_install_db and
> all is good.
>
> Trying to start the server gives me this though...
>
> 111212 07:49:18 mysqld
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:06:44 +0100
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:52 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
> > Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > What about running a 'file' command on the stuff and if the output
> > > contains 'text' then allow upload only with s
On 12/07/2011 02:17 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:08:09 +0100
Roman Rakus wrote:
Thanks all for answers. And I will get back to this point. I will
change GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX variable and run grub2-mkconfig. Hopefully
it will not brake anything.
It will break... everything. Any
Hi,
> you're using httpd prefork right?
rpm -qa httpd
httpd-2.2.21-4.fc17.x86_64
Assuming that is prefork - it's what's in rawhide
PFJ
--
Vertraue mir, ich weiss, was ich mache...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
40 matches
Mail list logo
