Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2.
MATE is just replacing "gnome" with "mate" everywhere, whether or not it
w
Hi,
What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well
maintained and there is a development community.
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
On 09/12/11 07:03, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> I tried switching to Xfce, and found it to be a lot better than Gnome 3,
> but it was still missing a lot of things I'm accustomed to in Gnome 2.
>
> I'm not trying to start another advocacy thread. I'm just trying to
> package up an alternative for people
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
> chance to include this DE in Fedora?
Please NO! We worked hard on making kdelibs3 apps work well in KDE Plasma 4
sessions. Trying to support Trinity sessions too is going to make a big
mess. Another big
On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to pa
On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
>
> Would anyo
On 12/09/2011 05:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>
On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> one
>>> >> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>> >
>> > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have
>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the distribution?
> When you have problems, the solu
On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few mon
Long time in the making, but at long last after 6 weeks of hard work the
Fedora Secondary Arch Team for Power finally managed to get the Fedora
16 Beta release done!
Available from mirrors now here:
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/16/ppc64/
under releases/test/16-Beta/
or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765792
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available
Product: Fedora
Am 05.12.2011 01:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> is it really a good decision to restart services after update in
>> the %post section?
>>
>> currently my hardest work is rebuild packages without this especially
>> for dist-upgrades with "yum" because in this case many would
On 12/09/2011 05:42 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
one
>> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>>> > > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we
>>> already have
>>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained pac
Hi,
I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to
support some digital cameras:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638
With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license
since the demosaic packs are released under GPLv2+ and
GPLv3+. Currently only
hello,
Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple
package to review :)
Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the
gnome-shell and multimedia keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765802
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
htt
Greetings, y’all!
This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is
my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your
packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha
release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my
l
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-RPC:
802d5bb488f3587f16aa69e8c002132b JSON-RPC-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro:
354dd4f058a30f085716010b771e27e9 Coro-6.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe
commit 071b0341c8b89029f779a7ce634fc2c8d440db34
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Dec 9 15:46:17 2011 +0100
6.07 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |3 +++
perl-Coro.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
2011/12/9 Siddhesh Poyarekar :
> Hi,
>
> I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to
> support some digital cameras:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638
>
> With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license
> since the demosaic packs are re
On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> Orion Poplawski writes:
>
>> I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
>> in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
>> issue?
>
> Hi there, please do not hesitate to file bugs for such regressions. I
>
On 12/06/2011 12:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> amanith-0.3-17.fc16.src.rpm
> freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc17.src.rpm
> irrlicht-1.7.2-8.fc17.src.rpm
> tkimg-1.4-4.fc17.src.rpm
> xloadimage-4.1-6.fc16.src.rpm
All of these are fixed now in rawhide and properly link to -lpng15
(freewrl also required th
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> The compatibility report between 1.1 and 3.2.2 versions of libnl
> generated by abi-compliance-checker [1] tool (see attachment:
> abi_compat_report.html) may be of help.
>
> [1] http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker
now back online:
*API changes/c
Greetings, y’all!
This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is
my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your
packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha
release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my
Orion Poplawski writes:
> On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski writes:
>>
>>> I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
>>> in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
>>> issue?
>>
>> Hi there, please do not hesitate to f
Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with "-gdwarf-4
-fvar-tracking-assignments" in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid
of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose
a crash has been optimized away. Are there bits of the toolchain that
can't handle DWARF
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:16:42PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with "-gdwarf-4
> -fvar-tracking-assignments" in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid
> of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose
> a crash has been opti
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:22:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> F16 gdb doesn't support DW_OP_entry_value and typed DWARF stack extensions
> I think, you need to wait for F17 for that.
These features are not yet in Rawhide, they are in FSF GDB HEAD, it should be
in Rawhide in a week or so.
I do not pl
On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use
the gdbm-devel package for this.
Since Thorsten K
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>
> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
> stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by june 2012 and CVE fixes by
> june 2013.
From what I
Le 04/12/2011 07:14, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
>> - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi
>> in F16 (quvi already exists)
> Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review
> ticket, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
On 12/09/2011 02:11 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>>
>> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
>> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
>> stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by j
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is not useful to generalize. There are lots of software components
> which aren't actively maintained but are useful to have in the
> distribution and all distributions have them however a desktop
> environment is a lot of work to maintain (as seen for instance in
> http:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Yes, gdk-pixbuf2 is not going away.
> gdk-pixbuf is the gtk1-era incarnation and not really used by anything
> anymore.
Whew, that's a relief!
Thanks!
Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary? The
problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same
architecture as the normal Fedora binutils. Thus the strip program used (from
the wrong binutils) appears to corrupt the binary.
David
--
devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity)
> and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity.
I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and
manpow
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:32 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary? The
> problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same
> architecture as the normal Fedora binutils. Thus the strip program used (from
> th
Adam Jackson wrote:
> 8 qt3-3.3.8b-37.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed. This was poking a round a lot in the png_info structure. Thankfully,
the NetBSD folks had already prepared a patch, which I applied in
qt3-3.3.8b-40.fc17, which built successfully in Rawhide.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> But isn't that why Fedora exists, to push everyone along :)
>
> Sounds like it needs to be in at least F18 for that timetable.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-September/000658.html
http://lists.fe
Hi, folks. As no agenda items other than the standard catch-ups have
been proposed via the list or on the Wiki page, and we have no action
items from last week's meeting to catch up with, the 2011-12-12 meeting
is provisionally cancelled, per the meeting SOP: there's no point having
a meeting just
40 matches
Mail list logo
