Hi,
I'm trying to build the latest cachefilesd package in the Fedora build system
for Rawhide/F17, but the build failed because I used %{_unitdir} in my specfile
and this doesn't appear to be expanded in the Fedora build system (see the
attached build.log). For reference, the build log can be fo
On 11/30/2011 11:39 AM, David Howells wrote:
> I'm trying to build the latest cachefilesd package in the Fedora build system
> for Rawhide/F17, but the build failed because I used %{_unitdir} in my
> specfile
> and this doesn't appear to be expanded in the Fedora build system (see the
> attached b
Paul Howarth wrote:
> You must have missed the bit in the guidelines where it says:
>
> Please note that in order for the %{_unitdir} macro to exist, your
> package must have:
>
> BuildRequires: systemd-units
Yes, I seem to be missing that. I have Requires but not BuildRequires. The
questio
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It would be nice, yes. In the meantime, Jeremy, can you try the attached
> patch?
Thanks very much - it doesn't seem to work in our setup. Dracut is mounting
the root iscsi device using the dhcp root-dev option, but we have _netdev
set in fstab.
-bash-4.2# mount | gre
On 11/30/2011 11:49 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
>
>> You must have missed the bit in the guidelines where it says:
>>
>> Please note that in order for the %{_unitdir} macro to exist, your
>> package must have:
>>
>> BuildRequires: systemd-units
>
> Yes, I seem to be missing that
commit e8ffb21c7611265812577a57b2364d6b50e35d09
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:05:15 2011 +0100
1.5006 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-cpanminus.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a
On 11/23/2011 02:52 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> (Cross Posting both to the Developers and Users List, sent a copy to
> Rex Dieter, who I believe is the maintainer for Kmess in the Fedora
> Community)
Manuel, you seem to have an interest in kmess, and I'd venture it's
current maintainers wouldn't
David Howells wrote:
> Yes, I seem to be missing that. I have Requires but not BuildRequires. The
> question is, though, why it builds on my desktop machine at all then... Did
> F16 always set it?
Are you using mock or rpmbuild on your desktop machine?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Yes, I seem to be missing that. I have Requires but not BuildRequires. The
> > question is, though, why it builds on my desktop machine at all then... Did
> > F16 always set it?
>
> Are you using mock or rpmbuild on your desktop machine?
rpmbuild.
David
--
de
Jeremy Sanders wrote:
>
> This works. I don't know whether you want to change "-m" to "-s"...
I tried changing -m to -s.
The network still tries to get shut down, despite the if statement being run
and the exit 1 command being run. This is because the exit command only
exits from the shell lo
David Howells wrote:
> rpmbuild.
There's your answer. The rpmbuild command would inherit all the packages
already installed on your system. You will already have systemd-units
installed because it is a dependency of just about every service.
If you used mock or scratch building on koji (which k
On 11/30/2011 03:49 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>> rpmbuild.
>
> There's your answer. The rpmbuild command would inherit all the packages
> already installed on your system. You will already have systemd-units
> installed because it is a dependency of just about every serv
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > rpmbuild.
>
> There's your answer. The rpmbuild command would inherit all the packages
> already installed on your system. You will already have systemd-units
> installed because it is a dependency of just about every service.
>
> If you used mock or scratch bui
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:20:41PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> > > rpmbuild.
> >
> > There's your answer. The rpmbuild command would inherit all the packages
> > already installed on your system. You will already have systemd-units
> > installed because it is a
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > For example smb4k have been dropped on F16, have we any replacement that
> > search the windows "network neighborhood" ?
>
> smb4k simply needs somebody to sign up as a new maintainer and get this
> through rereview
As a heads up, we're updating AutoQA to 0.7 today. I'm not expecting
any issues during the update process but no new jobs will be run while
we're updating the production systems. The update process shouldn't
take much more than an hour, maybe two if we hit problems.
If all goes well, you might not
Hi,
Just installing Fedora 16 on a new system. We set up a RAID1 with mdadm for /.
On boot, we're finding that if there is a RAID inconsistency, dracut
is waiting for mdadm reconstruction to complete before booting the
system. This means that after a power outage or other condition that
would cau
I know this is horribly late, but I just worked my way around to it!
Sorry for that.
Here's the recap of the Fedora 16 Graphics Test Week. The overall
numbers of tests done and bugs filed are down significantly, because I
was very busy and did not do a great job of arranging and promoting the
even
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
> Your patch does
>
> -bash-4.2# findmnt -m -n -o fstype,options /
> ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=0,data=ordered
>
> Which doesn't show the _netdev option. If I change this to
>
> -bash-4.2# findmnt -s -n -o fstype,options /
> ext4
Daniel Drake writes:
My understanding is that this reconstruction is a background task, is
there really a need for this to hold up boot?
This behaviour comes from
0064-90mdraid-wait-for-md-devices-to-become-clean.patch in the
dracut-013-19.fc16 package.
What part dracut runs during boot?
p
Hello,
I've been creating rpm packages for Fermi Linux for over 10 years, and
Scientific Linux 8 years, but I never had time to do anything for Fedora
and EPEL. Now that I'm not with Scientific Linux, I've got the time.
I'd like to help with the OpenShift client packages for Fedora and EPEL.
So I
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:25:25 -0600
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been creating rpm packages for Fermi Linux for over 10 years, and
> Scientific Linux 8 years, but I never had time to do anything for
> Fedora and EPEL. Now that I'm not with Scientific Linux, I've got
> the time. I'd like to
22 matches
Mail list logo
