On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:08:27 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> hdf5-1.8.8 is now in rawhide. Any packages that build against hdf5
> need to be rebuilt. I've already done R-hdf5 and gdl. Note that
> there is no soname bump but the hdf5 library checks that the runtime
> and compile time versions are
I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
with bundled libraries.
The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling lcms, but is
not sure about the other two, here's his explination:
hmmm s
> I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
> with bundled libraries.
>
> The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
> and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling lcms, but is
> not sure about the other two, here's his explination:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
>> with bundled libraries.
>>
>> The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
>> and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling lcms, but
quvi 0.4.0 is both an ABI and API break. See the rawhide report for
details.
Nicoleau, please remember to announce changes that may affect others:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities#Notify_others_of_changes_that_may_affect_their_packages
- ajax
signature.asc
D
On 11/17/2011 02:46 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:08:27 -0700
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> hdf5-1.8.8 is now in rawhide. Any packages that build against hdf5
>> need to be rebuilt. I've already done R-hdf5 and gdl. Note that
>> there is no soname bump but the hdf5 library che
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49:41PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> We *have* had Cisco's IPSec over TCP working; it's not particularly
> difficult. However, we never really worked out how to make it work
> nicely on Linux; the kernel really *really* wants to eat all TCP packets
> and will give a TC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754725
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:11:06AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> >> I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
> >> with bundled libraries.
> >>
> >> The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxm
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:10 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Why not use a tun/tap interface set up with a private ip address which the
> vpn application causes to be masqueraded by the host? That should work and
> be portable across all kernel versions.
Yeah, that's one of of the options. But
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754725
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
I have a package that contains ruby scripts in /usr/lib/packagename/
These scripts are only called/included via other binaries.
If I do not make these executable, then rpmlint complains about
non-executable content in /usr/lib/packagename/ and suggests I
move it to /usr/share/packagename. If I m
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I have a package that contains ruby scripts in /usr/lib/packagename/
>
> These scripts are only called/included via other binaries.
>
> If I do not make these executable, then rpmlint complains about
> non-executable content in /u
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> When you talk about scripts, do you mean that the code calling these scripts
> does the equivalent of this (note, I generated my examples by reading up on
> ruby on the web just prior to posting... please allow for this perhaps not
> being real ruby co
On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:54 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote:
>
> I see the same issue with "clone" on F16:
>
> [goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ fedpkg clone appliance-tools
> Could not execute clone: must be type, not classobj
> [goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ rpm -q fedpkg
> fedpkg-1.5-1.fc16.noarch
>
> Downgra
On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 17:48 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
>>> http://get.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
>
> Releng say they dropped jigdo due to
Just an FYI to anyone who's interested. The builds are on their way to
updates-testing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:09:47PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > When you talk about scripts, do you mean that the code calling these scripts
> > does the equivalent of this (note, I generated my examples by reading up on
> > ruby on the web just pr
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
[SNIP]
>> > Only if he's significantly modifying the bundled libs and upstream won't
>> > take the changes. If you unbundle and build against the system versions,
>> > and it works, that's what you need to do. Always link dynamically if at
2011-06-23 : FTBFS not responded to
2010-06-30 : -static packaging bug not responded to
Plus, release 0.89 from 20-May-2011 is available whereas Fedora contains
0.84 from 2010 ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/courier/files/cone/ ).
This looks like somebody with interest in Cone should sign up as
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:36:36PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.i686 requires /usr/lib/libkdb5.so.5
> 1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.x86_64 requires /usr/lib64/libkdb5.so.5
Should be fixed now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://peo
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> And also note -- the use of /usr/lib (*not* %{_libdir}) vs /usr/share
> is debatable (I said "could" above rather than should). The modules that go
> into the default search path, for python, perl, and ruby, for instance, all
> end up in /usr/lib if
Main package "syslinux" does:
Obsoletes: syslinux-devel < %{version}-%{release}
Provides: syslinux-devel
However, a syslinux-devel subpackage definition is present. A -devel
package is built. No comment explains above Obs/Prov pair.
%changelog only says:
* Thu Dec 17 2009 Peter Jones … - 3.
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user "mythtv" can not create the file
"/var/run/mythbackend.pid". I see other services that have their pid
file owned by their own user...
Also, user "mythtv" can't write to the log file in /var/log/mythtv/
How do I do this with systemd?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, reviving this conversation!
>
> I ran into the issue that user "mythtv" can not create the file
> "/var/run/mythbackend.pid". I see other services that have their pid
> file owned by their own user...
systemd doesn't really need a PID fil
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Ok, reviving this conversation!
>>
>> I ran into the issue that user "mythtv" can not create the file
>> "/var/run/mythbackend.pid". I see other services that have their pid
>> file own
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> Ok, reviving this conversation!
>>>
>>> I ran into the issue that user "mythtv" can not create the file
>>> "/var/run/mythbacke
Hi list,
could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
of additional packages (57 extra dependencies) for a 360KB package?
Doesn't this go against our update guidelines?
For the record, the installed version is 0.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi list,
> could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
> to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
> of additional packages (57 extra dependencies) for a 360KB package?
> D
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:33 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
> > to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
> >
On 17/11/11 22:09, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user "mythtv" c
Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:26 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
It's not critical path, so you only need a single
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Shaw"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, 18 November, 2011 5:41:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in abi-compatibility-checker?
>
> Just an FYI to anyone who's interested. The builds are on their way
> to
> upda
34 matches
Mail list logo
