On 11/05/2011 06:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Heiko Adams said:
>> yesterday in the afternoon the xfce-weather-plugin suddenly stopped
>> working and allways displays "No Data". Trying to switch my location
>> or update my fedora 16 against updates-testing also didn't solve that
>
On 05.11.2011 01:09, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Ian Malone gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on
>> overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing
>> /something/ but you don't know what. If it worked fluidly it would be
>> okay.
> For m
On 11/05/2011 09:36 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> On 11/05/2011 06:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Heiko Adams said:
>>> yesterday in the afternoon the xfce-weather-plugin suddenly stopped
>>> working and allways displays "No Data". Trying to switch my location
>>> or update my fedora 1
On 5 November 2011 00:50, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 05:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
>>>
>>> So what? Mainta
Hi!
I've been a happy Fedora user for some years, but now I'd like to give some
contribution to the project.
I'm going to package gnome-shell-extension-weather (URL:
https://github.com/simon04/gnome-shell-extension-weather),
an useful extension for Gnome Shell to display weather information
Compose started at Sat Nov 5 08:15:12 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6
w googlemail.com>
writes:
> Yet look at all the happy users of
default Gnome 3!
> I am one of them and I went directly
from the tilling-WM Xmonad to gnome
> 3! So you can't say it's only for
absolute noobs :). I installed it and
> it took about a week to get used to it
so that I stopped thin
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:40 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> w googlemail.com>
> writes:
>
> > Yet look at all the happy users of
> default Gnome 3!
> > I am one of them
[... snip ...]
> Please. What would you think of the
> system that when you click on FF starts
> FF, Evo and Gimp? I think you
Dne 5.11.2011 00:39, Ian Malone napsal(a):
> Is there any point in me reporting any bug in Fedora bugzilla ever then?
Of course, there are plenty of bugs caused by our packaging or moments
when one programs stomps on the other one's toes.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#u
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question to package maintainers.
>
> I'm the upstream developer of PicoLisp, and would like to see it
> included in the Fedora wishlist. Currently, PicoLisp is available in
> OpenWRT and the Debian family of
Hello,
Folloing are few sugar activities that I have packaged. They need to
be reviewed. Anyone interested in reviewing them all, some or one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741494
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744864
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749812
h
The link to the review request in the first message is wrong.
Here's the correct one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537
Waiting anxiously for your reviews... ;-)
2011/11/5 Mattia Meneguzzo
> Hi!
> I've been a happy Fedora user for some years, but now I'd like to give
> some con
Am 04.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> On 11/04/2011 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> well, everytime i come in contact with anything from apple i could throw
>> something out of the window beginning with the "systemctl ACTION service"
>> instead "systemctl SERVICE action" while i laug
Am 05.11.2011 01:50, schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> On 11/04/2011 05:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
>>>
>>> So what? Maintain
The list of packages that need to be rebuilt is attached. I'm not too
sure about ordering dependencies, but I do know that gd and libsexy
need to be rebuilt before some of the others.
Some of these packages will require source code changes. See
yesterday's discussion for hints about where to fin
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There are various 'hot topics' exposed during the F16 cycle that we'll
> likely expand the matrix to cover better in F17 - bootloader location
> issues, EFI issues, USB installer issues (when we first drew up the
> installation tests, using
Hello All,
I am not a techie or a geek :)
But I would like to learn about that(have a little experience though :) ),
Kalpa and Alex, you guys like to take me to the boat?
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Alexander Burger
This is my first time as a contributor to run into this.
Do I simply need to increment by release by 1 (or .1?) and build?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Buddhika Kurera
wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am not a techie or a geek :)
> But I would like to learn about that(have a little experience though :) ),
> Kalpa and Alex, you guys like to take me to the boat?
>
yeah sure,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Ma
If it is a new version from upstream then the release will be 1 but if you
are updating the SPEC file you would increment the release number.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This is my first time as a contributor to run into this.
>
> Do I simply need to increment by relea
Yes I have started from that and followed a classroom from Rahul too. I
think I am good to start, so join me with you :)
Will do it for F17 hureeey :) :)
Alex and Kalpa this is going to be my first real package work. Congrats
bckurera!
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigod
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Buddhika Kurera
wrote:
> Yes I have started from that and followed a classroom from Rahul too. I
> think I am good to start, so join me with you :)
yeah proceed according to the guideline.
> Will do it for F17 hureeey :) :)
> Alex and Kalpa this is going to be my
On 11/05/2011 07:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The list of packages that need to be rebuilt is attached.
I suggest maintainers take this opportunity to review whether all these
packages really need to be linked against libpng - I'm positive that the
list contains a lot of packages that don't. -Wl,--as
Having been a Fedora (and RedHat before that) user for more years then I
care to think about I have decided that it must be high time for me to
contribute my first package.
So I have opened a review request for libgxps with the aim of getting
support for XPS files into evince. The review reques
Johannes Lips wrote:
> http://developer.yahoo.com/weather/
> is this perhaps an alternative? Perhaps we could collect weather
> services and then choose the service which makes it easiest to port the
> plugin.
The KDE Plasma weather widget, which prides itself on only using sources
whose usage in
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I suggest maintainers take this opportunity to review whether all these
> packages really need to be linked against libpng - I'm positive that the
> list contains a lot of packages that don't. -Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS
> (in addition to RPM_LD_FLAGS) is one easy way that can
Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes - because most maintainers are having bugzilla-accounts upstream
> and reading the uptream-mailing-lists and are much more cooperative as
> the KDE SIG, especially Kevin Kofler
Yes, we have Bugzilla accounts upstream. But as I explained, upstream wants
to talk to the ac
Richard Shaw writes:
> This is my first time as a contributor to run into this.
> Do I simply need to increment by release by 1 (or .1?) and build?
If no source-code changes are needed, then yes, it's sufficient to
increment the release number (either way that suits you) and rebuild
in rawhide.
Am 05.11.2011 20:18, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> yes - because most maintainers are having bugzilla-accounts upstream
>> and reading the uptream-mailing-lists and are much more cooperative as
>> the KDE SIG, especially Kevin Kofler
>
> Yes, we have Bugzilla accounts upstream.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Shaw writes:
>> This is my first time as a contributor to run into this.
>> Do I simply need to increment by release by 1 (or .1?) and build?
>
> If no source-code changes are needed, then yes, it's sufficient to
> increment the release nu
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 17:04 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > There are various 'hot topics' exposed during the F16 cycle that we'll
> > likely expand the matrix to cover better in F17 - bootloader location
> > issues, EFI issues, USB instal
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 20:12:28 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
> On 11/05/2011 07:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The list of packages that need to be rebuilt is attached.
>
> I suggest maintainers take this opportunity to review whether all these
> packages really need to be linked against libpng - I'm positi
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> See, the problem we solved in RC5 only came when you wrote the installer
> to USB with l-i-t-d *and then used it to upgrade an F15 system*. The
> problem was that anaconda doesn't filter out the USB key it's installing
> from as a potential
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I decided to try another tack this evening on my test machine which
> "was" running F15 - I placed the F16 install iso on a partition which
> would not be touched - and loop mounted it - then pulled vmlinuz and
> initrd.img into /boot, and mad
Ian Malone wrote:
> What would be nice would be the ability to forward bugs upstream from
> within bugzilla.
Yes, definitely! But the problem is that getting it right is hard, and
requires closer cooperation with upstream infrastructure than we currently
have. (In particular, we'd like the bug t
enaut wrote:
> I am one of them and I went directly from the tilling-WM Xmonad to gnome
> 3! So you can't say it's only for absolute noobs :).
The fact that you were using a tiling WM first shows that you are much more
willing to adapt to unconventional designs than most other users. I, for
one,
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:49:16 +0100, RH (Reindl) wrote:
> guys this is not the way you can act with users treat them report
> exactly where and how you like it, a few peopole will do, most
> will never again report any bug and stop testing packages and
> later if there are too few testers maintaine
Dne 5.11.2011 21:40, Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> What would be nice would be the ability to forward bugs upstream from
>> within bugzilla.
>
> Yes, definitely! But the problem is that getting it right is hard, and
> requires closer cooperation with upstream infrastructure than we
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Lots of executables end up linked with libpng12 due to other libs (cairo,
> gdk-pixbuf2) being linked with it. Neither -lpng12 or -lpng is added
> explicitly.
Not due to them being LINKED with it, but due to them shipping .pc or .la
files (probably .pc, since we normally
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:02:42 +0100, KK (Kevin) wrote:
> > Lots of executables end up linked with libpng12 due to other libs (cairo,
> > gdk-pixbuf2) being linked with it. Neither -lpng12 or -lpng is added
> > explicitly.
>
> Not due to them being LINKED with it, but due to them shipping .pc or .l
Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Right now, if I want to start an app, I just hit alt+f2, type the first
> few letters, hit tab and then enter.
>
> No zoom, no search, no expose, no workspaces, no dash.
>
> Just see it that way: you have one powerful interface to do advanced
> stuff
On 11/05/2011 11:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:02:42 +0100, KK (Kevin) wrote:
>
>>> Lots of executables end up linked with libpng12 due to other libs (cairo,
>>> gdk-pixbuf2) being linked with it. Neither -lpng12 or -lpng is added
>>> explicitly.
>>
>> Not due to them bei
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:03:28 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
> How are you checking whether your executable ended up linked with
> something?
Admittedly, I trusted Tom Lane's list of affected packages, looked at
ldd -u -r output and then examined the source.
> If with ldd, note that it's recursive. A
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:16:57 -0700,
Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>
> Full information about the elections, including the elections schedule,
> and links to where one may nominate, can be seen here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
This misses an important link. FESCO has their policy f
Le 23/07/2011 18:40, Olivier BONHOMME a écrit :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am Olivier from France. I work now as a System/Network Architect in
> the Spatial domain especially in Satellite telecommunications. I work
> every day on Linux Platform especially Fedora / Redhat / CentOS platform
> doing sof
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:03:28 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
>> How are you checking whether your executable ended up linked with
>> something?
> Admittedly, I trusted Tom Lane's list of affected packages, looked at
> ldd -u -r output and then examined the source.
My list was
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:07:44 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:03:28 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
> >> How are you checking whether your executable ended up linked with
> >> something?
>
> > Admittedly, I trusted Tom Lane's list of affected packages, looked at
> > ldd -u -r output and
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:07:44 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
>> My list was just the result of "repoquery --whatrequires".
> The last Rawhide build of "geeqie" also doesn't depend on libpng*.
> F-15 does, however, which might be where you've run repoquery.
Hmm ... actually I di
Sorry (about the lack of clarification, *and* for top-posting - on a sucky
client) -
I was going for brevity, and mistakenly thought that the policies/requirements
for each election was on the main election page and/or each nomination page -
and it's not, which should also be corrected.
-Robyn
Kevin Kofler chello.at> writes:
> I, for
> one, want my computer to work the way I learned and interiorized a computer
> works, any "innovative" interface destroys my automatisms and confuses me.
>
> I'm using Plasma Desktop with the Classic menu (not the default fancy
> Kickoff), only 1 virt
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
> The KDE Plasma weather widget, which prides itself on only using sources
> whose usage in this context was allowed by the data provider
To be fair, I believe that the usage of weather.com by a number of open
source projects was within the policies. However
Once upon a time, Ville Skyttä said:
> How are you checking whether your executable ended up linked with
> something? If with ldd, note that it's recursive. AFAIU for example
> "eu-readelf -d /path/to/something | grep NEEDED" shows a better picture
> which is also mirrored in package dependencie
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:29:38PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:16:57 -0700,
> Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> >
> > Full information about the elections, including the elections schedule,
> > and links to where one may nominate, can be seen here:
> > https://fedoraprojec
Chris Adams wrote:
> Hmm, I didn't know that. Which does RPM use when generating
> dependencies? It would appear that it is is using ldd; should that be
> changed?
No, RPM does not pull in recursive soname dependencies, only direct ones.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
54 matches
Mail list logo
