Re: Rawhide evolution gone funny

On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 07:57 +, Paul Johnson wrote: > For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or > anything. It'll start but has on the title bar > > e-utils-WARNING **: /usr/lib64/evolution/3.2/libcomposer.so.0: > undefined symbol: gtkhtml_editor_file_chooser_dialog_run > F

Re: Bug 750566 - qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1

On 11/03/2011 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Callaway wrote: >> I took a quick look at qtparted a few days ago, the problem is that >> qtparted depended on functionality (move, copy, resize) in parted that >> no longer exists in parted-3.0. > > > Removing features like this, without providing

F-16 Branched report: 20111103 changes

Compose started at Thu Nov 3 08:15:25 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-3.fc16.x86_64 requires zif >= 0:0.2.5 bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-

rawhide report: 20111103 changes

Compose started at Thu Nov 3 08:15:23 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6

[perl-smartmatch] import

commit 8396e6159e3c2863d09b9a0b18ab92648b85d9bf Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Nov 3 14:10:47 2011 +0100 import .gitignore |1 + perl-smartmatch.spec | 64 ++ sources |1 + 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0

[perl-smartmatch] Educate rpmlint

commit 57654360c4f8e3acc66e92178e3fd7a2d5f1bb4d Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Nov 3 14:36:31 2011 +0100 Educate rpmlint .rpmlint |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint new file mode 100644 index 000..812c800 --- /dev/null +++ b/

convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server. In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init script has: ... vercmd="from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()" py_dir=$(python -c "${vercmd}") exe="${py_dir}/hekafsd.py"

Re: convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

On 11/03/2011 03:10 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init > script has: > ... > vercmd="from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print > get_python_lib()" > py_dir=$(python -c "${vercmd}") > exe="${py_dir}/hekafsd.py" But the path

Re: Making release of KDE LiveDVD spin for Fedora 17

To be more clear, I mean that both 700M and 2G KDE images can be released. 700M still will be main live image released in releases/*/Live/ http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Live/ But 2G image can be released along with other Fedora spins in releases/*/Spins/ http://dl.fedora

Re: convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:10 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server. > > In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init > script has: > ... > vercmd="from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print > ge

F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

Hi, I experience random shutdown delays of ca. 2 min (testing F16 RC1 thru RC4, hd installation with LXDE). To debug it I removed "quiet" and added "systemd.log_level=debug" in /etc/defaults/grub (kernel boot params). This are the only messages logged since shutdown command (regardless whether d

Re: F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

On 11/02/2011 12:25 PM, JB wrote: > I experience random shutdown delays of ca. 2 min (testing F16 RC1 thru > RC4, hd installation with LXDE). ... > What else can I look at or debug and how ? Please boot with: log_buf_len=1M systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=kmsg Create an executable sc

[Bug 658976] perl-CGI, perl-CGI-Simple: CVE-2010-2761 - hardcoded MIME boundary value for multipart content, CVE-2010-4410 - CRLF injection allowing HTTP response splitting

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976 Vincent Danen changed: What|Removed |Added -

Buildroot override problem

I have 2 new packages. The first one, flocq, has been in F16 testing for 5 days. It is needed to build the second one, gappalib-coq. I go to the BuildRoot override page to submit an override for flocq. After typing in flocq, it offers me "flocq-1.4.0-2.fc16", which is wrong. That version had a

Re: convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

On 11/03/2011 02:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:10 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server. >> >> In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init >> script has: >> ... >> vercmd="from dist

Re: Buildroot override problem

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 09:14 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I have 2 new packages. The first one, flocq, has been in F16 testing > for 5 days. It is needed to build the second one, gappalib-coq. I go > to the BuildRoot override page to submit an override for flocq. After > typing in flocq, it offer

Re: convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:10:03AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server. > > In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init > script has: > ... > vercmd="from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; prin

Re: F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

Michal Schmidt redhat.com> writes: > ... > Show us the shutdown-log.txt. ... Here you go: http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8 JB -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

On 11/03/2011 04:47 PM, JB wrote: > Here you go: > > http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8 The parameters "log_buf_len=1M systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=kmsg" were not on the command line, so this log does not contain all the information. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: convert init.d to systemd, how to determine which python is installed

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:17:47PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Just out of curiosity are there any guidelines forbidding creating a > symbolic link to that file from /usr/sbin > > So instead of having a unit file that looks like this... > > [Unit] > Description=HekaFS an Clustered

[Bug 750805] Fails to build on ARM, needs to use default setjmp not ucontext

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-11-03 12:34:02 EDT --- perl-Coro-5.372-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for

[Bug 750805] Fails to build on ARM, needs to use default setjmp not ucontext

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-11-03 12:32:22 EDT --- perl-Coro-5.372-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for

Re: Buildroot override problem

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > I would guess because it's only considering packages in > -updates-candidate as buildroot override candidates, and -3 is in > -updates-testing. Hmmm. Then I'm stuck until F16 starts taking updates again, it seems. Thanks for the reply. -- J

Re: F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

Michal Schmidt redhat.com> writes: > > On 11/03/2011 04:47 PM, JB wrote: > > Here you go: > > > > http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8 > > The parameters "log_buf_len=1M systemd.log_level=debug > systemd.log_target=kmsg" were not on the command line, so this log does > not contain all the information

Heads up - PHPUnit 3.6 in rawhide and f16

Hi, I have submit PHPUnit 3.6 (and its dependencies) for fedora >= 16. For all the test suites I have run, I have only encounter 1 problem Include Framework.php which was deprecated in 3.5 is now removed. So, if you run test suite during build, fix, if needed, is quite easy. Regards, Remi.

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On 11/01/2011 06:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg > (part of fedora-packager). > > This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend. > Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython which br

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > $ /usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches > git Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches", line 20, in > import pyfedpkg > ImportError: No module named pyfedpkg Oh thanks, I hadn't thought to test this. Is a

Re: F16 - random shutdown delays - systemd related ?

JB gmail.com> writes: > > Michal Schmidt redhat.com> writes: > > > ... > > Show us the shutdown-log.txt. > ... > > Here you go: > > http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8 > > JB > I see these NetworkManager activities that are repeated and seem to be identical (if this is a problem, then systemd or

[389-devel] Please review: [Bug 750625] Fix Coverity minor defects

Additional coverity fixes... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750625 *Fix Coverity (11055-2) Explicit null dereferenced; git patch file (master)* (1.41 KB, patch) 2011-11-03 14:40 EDT

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

Jesse Keating píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 11:40 -0700: > On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > $ /usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches > > git Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches", line 20, in > > import pyfedpkg > > ImportError: No mod

[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

At the Fedora 16 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 16 Final Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on November 8, 2011. And to clarify: It is a nice, golden, almost... mustard-like color. :) Thank you to EVERYONE for your sleepless nights, endless testing, prompt bug-fixing, and

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On 11/03/2011 12:40 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> $ /usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches >> git Traceback (most recent call last): >>File "/usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches", line 20, in >> import pyfedpkg >> ImportError: No module named pyfe

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On 11/01/2011 06:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg > (part of fedora-packager). > > This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend. > Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython which br

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > $ /usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches > git Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/libexec/fedpkg-fixbranches", line 20, in > import pyfedpkg > ImportError: No module named pyfedpkg Pushed something to fix this. -- Jesse Keating

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

On Nov 3, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > $ fedpkg local > error: Failed build dependencies: > ncurses-devel is needed by psmisc-22.14-1.fc17.i686 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 64, in > sys.exit(client.args.command()) > File "/u

F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests. There are probably bugs! I've done some quick tests on the hardware I have handy and in kvm, and

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 17:57 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat > llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even > on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests. I said on IRC, but just to reiterate

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 12:15 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > Thank you to EVERYONE for your sleepless nights, endless testing, prompt > bug-fixing, and endless patience through 5 release candidates. For the record, Fedora 16 required a total of 20 TC / RC composes. That's a new record, at least si

glibc 2.14.1 upgrade on F15 ...

Hello, Could the glibc maintainer either revert the GLIBC_PRIVATE filter or rebuild libnih and nss_db with the right GLIBC_PRIVATE filter? so users will be able to at least have a less buggy version. Thks. -- Jérôme Benoit aka fraggle La Météo du Net - http://grenouille.com OpenPGP Key ID :

Grub2 and Grub2-efi should be marked as conflict with each other

Hi, all, I'd think that grub2 and grub2-efi should be marked as conflict with each other 'cause 1) They put some common scripts into /etc/grub.d and /sbin with same names although some grub2-efi scripts start with prefix 'grub2-efi'. 2) Remove either grub2 or grub2-efi would affe

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes: > As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat > llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even > on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests. For all of us gnome-shell sceptics that prefer the fallb

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 15:56:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'd certainly second Robyn's thanks to all the awesome folks on the > devel, releng and QA teams who worked so hard to get this thing done and > shiny without slipping any further. We bent process a little to make the > release

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 03:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes: > > > As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat > > llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even > > on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:23 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 15:56:49 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I'd certainly second Robyn's thanks to all the awesome folks on the > > devel, releng and QA teams who worked so hard to get this thing done and > > shiny without

Re: glusterfs and hekafs release number for f16 and rawhide; systemd switch-over

On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:01 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the > same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm, > glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and > hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.

Mozilla AsiaCamp : Who are coming over?

Anybody coming over to Mozilla Asia Camp? .. https://wiki.mozilla.org/AsiaCamp2011 I know at least 2 are coming. If theres a number probably I can work out a small FAD/Meetup sometime before/between/after the event. Regards -- Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail / KageSenshi Inigo Consulting (FOSS/Plo

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > That's really a policy decision for the GNOME / Fedora desktop teams, > not for ajax. Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, so I asked. > But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most > hardware that previou

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 06:23 +, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > > > That's really a policy decision for the GNOME / Fedora desktop teams, > > not for ajax. > > Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, so I asked. No more than anyone - the