On 10/27/2011 08:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
>> One big question though: can RPM handle such a change? IIRC, when the
>> switch from /etc/rc.d/init.d to /etc/init.d was made, initially
>> everything was going to be moved and the old paths symlinked for a few
>>
This feature is going to cause a lot of churn.
Aside from the huge changes within fedora I
think a bigger issue will be downstream of fedora
where third party packages and configs will
require large changes. I would worry we might
alienate our users a bit with this?
Now I'm all for clean up, but
Compose started at Fri Oct 28 08:15:48 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-2.fc16.x86_64 requires zif >= 0:0.2.5
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
cluster-snmp-0.18.7-
Hi,
Please see these review requests,
PDFCrack -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
ndjbdns -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
Could someone approve these packages please?
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
http://feedmug.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:36 AM, P J P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please see these review requests,
>
>
> PDFCrack -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
>
> ndjbdns -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
>
> Could someone approve these packages please?
I've just made some c
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:47:04AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 08:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> The strategy is:
>
> - Replace binaries in /bin /sbin /usr/sbin /lib /lib64 with symlinks to
> their counterpart in /usr. Symlinking is done in rpm %post. Symlinks are
> part of the fi
One thing I'm not clear on is when the switch between the initramfs and the
actual / filesystem is performed. For instance, what does the user get if
they boot single user? What do they get if they boot single user and /usr
is on an nfs filesystem?
-Toshio
pgpC7SFu4zoLJ.pgp
Description: PGP si
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:47:04 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Read the rpm snippet on the feature page, please.
I just briefly browsed the feature page and the requirement on initramfs
piqued me. Maybe I'm wrong, but usrmove would then make fedora systems
from now on specifically require the use o
Am 28.10.2011 16:26 schrieb "Zing" :
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:47:04 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
> > Read the rpm snippet on the feature page, please.
>
> I just briefly browsed the feature page and the requirement on initramfs
> piqued me. Maybe I'm wrong, but usrmove would then make fedora sys
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:39:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > ndjbdns -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
> >
> > Could someone approve these packages please?
>
> As for ndjbdns, I'm not quite comfortable with that one. Although I
> hate to mention it because it looks like so
[meant to go out last night but failed thanks to internet connection
silliness]
Yes, it's episode three of the blockbuster 'Remaining F16 blockers'
trilogy - thanks for lining up all week, folks, have a complimentary
small popcorn.
As mentioned last time, we span a TC3 image for testing while we
We have a parted update to fix a new blocker:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747497
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/parted-3.0-4.fc16
I've built a boot.iso with the updated parted for testing, it's
available here:
http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/20111027_preRC1.x64.boot.iso
Hello Richard,
- Original Message -
> From: Richard Shaw
> I've just made some comments for PFDCrack, I'll take it once you've
> made the updates.
Ah cool, thanks.
> As for ndjbdns, I'm not quite comfortable with that one. Although I
> hate to mention it because it looks like so
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719152
> gappalib-coq - Coq support library for gappa (requires flocq)
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719757
> apron - Numerical abstract domain library
Thomas swapped 1 review with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691913
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2011-10-28 16:40:46 EDT ---
ocaml-camlp5-6.02.3-1.fc16,coq-8.3pl2-3.fc16 has been sub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hey, folks! We could really do with karma on these updates:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15042 (kdepimlibs)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.8.0-0.23.rc1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15038 (parted) use
my boot.iso from earlier to test
17 matches
Mail list logo
