Kevin Kofler writes:
>> It's not the Firefox maintainers, it is Mozilla who have decided that
>> release numbers are irrelevant and that the bug fix release for
>> Firefox 5 is Firefox 6.
>
> If Firefox were following the update policy, they'd backport the security
> fixes, not push the new vers
Petr Machata writes:
> Kevin Kofler writes:
>
>>> It's not the Firefox maintainers, it is Mozilla who have decided that
>>> release numbers are irrelevant and that the bug fix release for
>>> Firefox 5 is Firefox 6.
>>
>> If Firefox were following the update policy, they'd backport the security
Hello,
I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up openswan and
xl2tpd
manually and this works fine. However, bringing up the connection is not
very
comfortable and it would be much nicer to be able to use the
networkmanager-openswan
plugin.
Unfortunately, l2tp and other 'advanc
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 06:35 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> If it could also not grab port 0.0.0.0:53 in the future, that would be
>> great. I'd like to work with whichever libvirt developer takes this
>> package on.
>
> Are you talking about dnsmasq or the way that li
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:15 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 11:34 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x -> 2.8 into F16 ?
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:24 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> > On 08/22/2011 06:35 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> If it could also not grab port 0.0.0.0:53 in the future, that would be
> >> great. I'd like to work with whichever libvirt developer takes this
>
2011/8/25 Paul Wouters :
> Again, this is based on f14, not f15/f16. I am not sure how much this has been
> addressed. But if we want DNSSEC validation on the endnode, at the very least
> 127.0.0.1:53 needs to be left free.
Are you sure the dnsmasq instance started by libvirt is really
grabbing 12
On 25/08/11 15:24, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Here the issue is:
>
> 3) I mostly don't need/want any DNS/DHCP in my bridged setup, but it still
> configures and starts dnsmasq (at least on F14 using virt-manager)
> (eg I have a /28 bridges to eth1 with static IPs, I don't want it)
>
> The big
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
>> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
>>
> We should get that corrected. not
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> 3) I mostly don't need/want any DNS/DHCP in my bridged setup, but it still
>> configures and starts dnsmasq (at least on F14 using virt-manager)
>> (eg I have a /28 bridges to eth1 with static IPs, I don't want it)
>
> On a non-bridged setup it lis
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2011/8/25 Paul Wouters :
>> Again, this is based on f14, not f15/f16. I am not sure how much this has
>> been
>> addressed. But if we want DNSSEC validation on the endnode, at the very least
>> 127.0.0.1:53 needs to be left free.
>
> Are you sure the d
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:37:26PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2011/8/25 Paul Wouters :
> > Again, this is based on f14, not f15/f16. I am not sure how much this has
> > been
> > addressed. But if we want DNSSEC validation on the endnode, at the very
> > least
> > 127.0.0.1:53 needs to be left
Hi all,
Please be notified that I intend to orphan the following packages immediately;
* referencer
* file-browser-applet
* gnome-scan
Upstream development on both referencer and gnome-scan has stagnated
for a while now; also one of the packages referencer requires
(libgnomemm) has been dropped r
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> libvirt's dnsmasq will never be grabbing any 127.0.0.1 address. It is
>> In my experiments it did not, and the issue instead was that the other
>> DNS server [1] wanted to grab port 53 on *all* interfaces.
>
> Yeah, that is the normal problem peopl
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
> >> path. Why is this? Is that
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as po
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as possibl
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider sy
Am 24.08.2011 19:36, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Wed, 24.08.11 10:45, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> Reindl Harald writes:
>>> Am 23.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Tom Lane:
there's no other way for "mysqladmin ping" to work, for example
>>
>>> and where is the problem?
>>
>> I'm n
Am 24.08.2011 20:40, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 19:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Wed, 24.08.11 10:05, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a
database. I'd like to support
On 08/25/2011 10:28 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> As well, installing both stable versions side-by-side isn't an option as
> you can't install them into the same prefix: the libraries have the same
> SONAME, the new ones are expected to be ABI compatible. Therefore I
> don't see a real alternative
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 10:28 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
>> As well, installing both stable versions side-by-side isn't an option as
>> you can't install them into the same prefix: the libraries have the same
>> SONAME, the new ones are expected to
Compose started at Thu Aug 25 13:15:36 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On 08/25/2011 12:00 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 08/25/2011 10:28 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>
>>> As well, installing both stable versions side-by-side isn't an option as
>>> you can't install them into the same prefix: the libraries h
Actually there is another reason for socket activation to use AF_INET as
well as AF_UNIX: doing so prevents e.g. rpc.statd from port-squatting.
In fact, this is why CUPS no longer ships to ship a portreserve file.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
de
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:58:29AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 10:28 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > As well, installing both stable versions side-by-side isn't an option as
> > you can't install them into the same prefix: the libraries have the same
> > SONAME, the new ones are
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
> > path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
> >
> We should get that corrected. notting has
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:58 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 10:28 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > As well, installing both stable versions side-by-side isn't an option as
> > you can't install them into the same prefix: the libraries have the same
> > SONAME, the new ones are expect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2011-08-25 13:27:36
EDT ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-PO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-25 13:34:47 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-25 13:39:09 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-25 13:39:44 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up openswan and
> xl2tpd
> manually and this works fine. However, bringing up the connection is not
> very
> comfortable and it would be much nicer to be able to use
2011/8/25 Dan Williams :
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
>> Hello,
> It's probable they will be but it might take some work. AFAIK there
> isn't yet an L2TP VPN plugin for NM though I've heard of people working
> on one.
https://github.com/atorkhov/NetworkManager-l2
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> The other option is for someone to build packages and host them on
>>> fedorapeople.org as a personal repository.
>>>
>>> I ce
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> I am orphaning the techtalk-pse package because the Gtk2::MozEmbed perl
> module will no longer be maintained in Fedora because gtkmozembed
> support has been removed from xulrunner.
>
> If upstream (or anybody) has the time to work on
On 08/25/2011 01:18 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> Side-by-side means into the same prefix. You can only have one gimp
> version installed into the /usr prefix, you're free to install a
> different one into /opt/gimp-x.y or somewhere into your home if you're
> an ordinary user.
>
> Nils
Ah tha
While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
MBR partition table.
I would like to understand the change and its implications, and I have
unsuccessfully tried to track down more information. I haven't
I am looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text .
It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file. I am reviewing
pipebench at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
The issue with the one the upstream author provided contained some
On 08/26/2011 12:17 AM, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am looking at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text .
>
> It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file.
No, this is a misinterpretation and overinterpretation
Upstreams need to license their works prop
On 08/26/2011 03:47 AM, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am looking at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text .
>
> It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file. I am
> reviewing pipebench at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
> The issue with
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
> >> path. Why is this? Is that
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700,
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:17 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
> out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
> MBR partition table.
>
> I would like to understand the change and its implications, and I hav
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:17 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> > While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
> > out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
> > MBR partition table.
> >
> >
Petr Machata wrote:
> Is that actually possible? I seem to recall that the reason why Firefox
> can be called Firefox in Fedora, and not, say, Iceweasel or whatever, is
> that we ship vanilla upstream.
I have always said that if we can't ship Firefox with that name while
following the Fedora pol
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:34:00PM -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> is this a good reason ?
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/08/23/1355225/The-GIMP-Now-Has-a-Working-Single-Window-Mode
That's a great example of what shouldn't happen _inside_ a release. New
releases come out twice a year -- w
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:17:58PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
>
> It's also true that if you create an msdos/mbr partition table on your
> disk prior to installation and then choose any option except for "Use
> All Space" (or "clearpart --all" in kickstart) anaconda will not destroy
> your existin
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:13 -0500, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:17:58PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> >
> > It's also true that if you create an msdos/mbr partition table on your
> > disk prior to installation and then choose any option except for "Use
> > All Space" (or "clear
Hi
Graphical interface to crontab and at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733572
Was retired in Fedora earlier due to dependency on applet. Latest
upstream disables applet by default.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
# F16 Beta Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-08-26
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The first Beta blocker review meeting starts at 17:00 UTC in
#fedora-bugzappers. We'll do a first run through the proposed Beta
blocke
Hi,
Berusky2 is a 3D sequel of Berusky and former commercial project:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
project homepage: http://anakreon.cz/en/Berusky2.htm
I promise the spec file is tinny and reviewer friendly :)
Thnaks,
ma.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
56 matches
Mail list logo
