Re: To Require or not to Require?

2011-08-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:08:50 -0400, SS (Simo) wrote: > If rpmbuild does not add an implicit requires with libraryX >= we built against> then it is certainly broken. One could also argue that an activity like "yum install ..." ought to search for and apply the latest available updates of needed p

Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure

2011-08-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:45:15 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> If a package fails to build in a mass rebuild because -Werror was enabled >> then that's additional work for several people to fix something that may not >> have ever actually been broken. > > 99% of warnings will

Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure

2011-08-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Whether to invest in enabling -Werror for all packages in a mass rebuild > however is another question. Pardon, but this is not a question, this is beyond reason and foolish. > There will be many build failures, and > some will be unwarranted. Exact

EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? -Ilyes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread drago01
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi there, > > Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, > shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? > > It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, > but merely packaging it as a first step. >

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Ilyes Gouta
> Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review > ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at

rawhide report: 20110813 changes

2011-08-13 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Aug 13 08:15:29 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread drago01
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review >> ... > > I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should > also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. So? You (or anyone el

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Ilyes Gouta
> You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >>> Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and su

Re: conflict in packages in fedora 15

2011-08-13 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
does tags: f17 in < http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257227 it's not pushed to 15, not even to 16 > $ repoquery --whatrequires netxen-firmware > netxen-firmware-0:4.0.534-4.fc15.noarch what packages requires this netxen-firmware ? just itslef ? can't get it -- devel mailing

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Björn Persson
Ilyes Gouta wrote: > I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? Björn Persson signature.asc

Re: conflict in packages in fedora 15

2011-08-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:14:38 +0300, MA (Muayyad) wrote: > does tags: f17 in < > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257227 > it's not pushed to 15, not even to 16 No, it isn't. Is it a major problem to you? Do you need that firmware? Did you try to install it? Or was it installed

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 Björn Persson wrote: > Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. > > According to PathScale's license document their products are partly > free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free > parts. How usef

F-16 Branched report: 20110813 changes

2011-08-13 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Aug 13 13:15:22 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

2011-08-13 Thread Ilyes Gouta
We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined (features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and validated. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 > Björn Persson wrote: > >> Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> > I'm trying

wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?

2011-08-13 Thread Heiko Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? - -- Regards, Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mo

Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure

2011-08-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Whether to invest in enabling -Werror for all packages in a mass rebuild >> however is another question. > > Pardon, but this is not a question, this is beyond reason and foolish. > >> There will be many build failures, and >> s

Re: wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?

2011-08-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until > NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? What SELinux errors? Do you have a bug report? Rahul -- devel

Re: wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?

2011-08-13 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 13.08.2011 20:25, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi, >> is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until >> NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? > > What SELi

Single remaining F16 Alpha blocker bug is in rpm, and needs help

2011-08-13 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. We're down to a single confirmed blocker without a fix preventing us composing Fedora 16 Alpha RC4, but it's in rpm and we haven't really had much feed-in from the rpm maintainers. Can anyone who thinks they could play an rpm developer on TV please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat

Strange rpath behavior

2011-08-13 Thread Jorge Gallegos
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for uwsgi server in this ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 however I am trying to fix the rpath issues I commented there because otherwise i think it simply won't pass. I am faced with some... weird behavior. The software does not use the sta

Re: Strange rpath behavior

2011-08-13 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Jorge Gallegos wrote, at 08/14/2011 09:22 AM +9:00: > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for uwsgi server in this ticket > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 however I am trying > to fix the rpath issues I commented there because otherwise i think it > simply won't pass. I am faced