On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:16 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I think there should have been some discussion about this on the FESCO
> request
> I submitted. I have some concerns about what was implemented. Are there bz
> filed for this or more discussion about it somewhere?
most of the discussion h
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> %A %Ol:%OM %p
%OIis replaced by the hour (12-hour clock) using the locale's alternative
numeric symbols. %OMis replaced by the minutes using the locale's
alternative numeric symbols.
it seems that Shell.util_format_date which relies on g_
please use the attached patch till we fix glib or fix mozilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728889
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a
builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch
maintainer.
If you could submit the build-override for the package I'll rebuild
abiword for f-16.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Ju
On 08/08/2011 06:23 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Once that's done (and redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-15.fc16 has been gone
> through updates), if you're using a %configure-style spec file, defining
> the magic macro is all you have to do. The rpm macros will notice the
> macro, and put the right magic i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I've filed a bug for the control-center package
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729271) because I ran into
a boring problem with gnome-sound-applet, which is part of that package,
on my Xfce desktop. The gnome-sound-applet is autosta
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list. For
> example, sudo is a very important program that we make security claims about.
> It is not on that list.
Because it's SUID.
> I think there should have bee
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Jussi Lehtola <
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Arch-specific_extensions_to_scripting_languages
>
> --
> Jussi Lehtola
> Fedora Project Contributor
> jussileht...@fedoraproject.o
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:51:07 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list.
> > For example, sudo is a very important program that we make security
> > claims about. It is no
Hi,
In BoxGrinder we're seeing some issues when upgrading to latest kernel on
AMI's, which was reported here:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BGBUILD-289
You can see in that ticket full boot log (console log in AWS terms) from a
started instance with newest kernel. Jeremy pointed out t
... now, finally, with more 64-bit-ness!
>From Ted:
> I've made the first WIP release of e2fsprogs 1.42. The primary purpose
> is for people to test the 64-bit functionality and be confident that we
> didn't introduce any 32-bit regressions.
So in theory you can at least mfks & mount a 16T fs a
I've filed the following ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4873
and created an update for f16, forgot that this morning.
I hope this was in line with the general guidelines of this process.
Johannes
On 08/09/2011 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I've done rawhide. It seems I don't ha
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 08:47:16AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:51:07 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list.
> > > For example, sudo is a ve
You do build overrides in bodhi now. Its a menu option on the left panel.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> I've filed the following ticket
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4873
> and created an update for f16, forgot that this morning.
> I hope this was in li
Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:51:07 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>
>>> This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list.
>>> For example, sudo is a very important program that we make
On 08/09/2011 08:47 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> My main concern is that the macro will be misapplied and overall performance
> will take a hit. I don't know how a macro can tell the intent of an
> application as it links it. There has not been a chmod so that it knows this
> is setuid and needs more p
Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just let
me know.
Johannes
On 08/09/2011 03:24 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> You do build overrides in bodhi now. Its a menu option on the left panel.
>
> Peter
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Johannes Lips
> wrote:
>> I've filed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Auto:
cf6fbd37e27726dd8373faa13a85e31f Config-Auto-0.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Steve Grubb wrote:
> This is not the policy that I asked for.
Well, what Ajax described isn't a policy at all. It's a set of RPM macros
designed to make it easier to follow the (soon to be) policy. RPM macros can't
enforce the policy. Enforcement must be done elsewhere.
> When you make a PIE ex
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 09:20:53 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Taking RHEL6 through common criteria and FIPS-140, filing dozens of
> > security bugs after studying some problems and sending patches. I am
> > monitoring the FESCO ticket, but I don't monitor fedora-devel all the
> > time because
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:17:29AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 09:20:53 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > You can't bring a policy to FESCO, fail to turn up to any of the
> > meetings
>
> I didn't fail to turn up to any of the meetings. I watched the issue and
> attended
Hello,
One of the packages[2] I am trying to package requires libjpeg from the
ijg[1]. Since fedora is using libjpeg-turbo, I wanted to know if libjpeg
and libjpeg are installable in parallel? Should I package libjpeg as a
build dep, or should I be trying to patch the source to use
libjpeg-turbo?
2011/8/9 Ankur Sinha :
> Hello,
>
> One of the packages[2] I am trying to package requires libjpeg from the
> ijg[1]. Since fedora is using libjpeg-turbo, I wanted to know if libjpeg
> and libjpeg are installable in parallel? Should I package libjpeg as a
> build dep, or should I be trying to patch
On 08/09/2011 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I didn't fail to turn up to any of the meetings.
...
> I would rather have seen a macro added to auto tools to detect gcc support
> for this so that upstream developers can more easily add the support natively
> for all distributions.
So you just failed
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:47 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> My main concern is that the macro will be misapplied and overall performance
> will take a hit.
That's a valid concern, but any hardened build would have this problem.
I'm happy to talk about how the performance impact can be mitigated, but
See attached.
From d24d382c325c8794c05bcb56b3820b15e4a67e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:42:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure
Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
their Makefile
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:40:58 +0200
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just
> let me know.
Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in as:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abiword-2.8.6-12.fc16
Please test and add karma.
A
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Unless the checking is part of autoqa this simply isn't
> sufficient. There's a huge benefit to implementing it in the way that's
> easiest for maintainers.
The earlier a problem is detected, the cheaper it is to fix. If I have
understood AutoQA right, it gets involved
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Unless the checking is part of autoqa this simply isn't
> > sufficient. There's a huge benefit to implementing it in the way that's
> > easiest for maintainers.
>
> The earlier a problem is detected, the
The release notes beats for Fedora 16 are now open.
If you are working on some new feature for Fedora 16 that should be
included in the release notes, please consider heading on over to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Beats
select the appropriate beat for your feature, and write a lit
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> See attached.
Looks fine to me. The only reason I have to dislike it is the
temptation for people to inspect build logs as a proof of what flags a
package was built with (since the only sane thing is to store that in
the binary itself, whi
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:52:56 AM Marek Goldmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In BoxGrinder we're seeing some issues when upgrading to latest kernel on
> AMI's, which was reported here:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BGBUILD-289
>
> You can see in that ticket full boot log (console log in A
Adam Jackson writes:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> See attached.
> Looks fine to me. The only reason I have to dislike it is the
> temptation for people to inspect build logs as a proof of what flags a
> package was built with (since the only sane thing is to store
Already approved once. Just need a quick re-review of the rename and the
added Obsoletes:
Original Message
Subject: package re-review needed — CloudFS name change to HekaFS
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:40:20 -0400
From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re-revi
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What happens in packages using a (possibly old) autoconf script that
> doesn't recognize --disable-silent-rules?
Autoconf convention is to ignore unknown rules. And indeed, all that
results is a warning:
configure: WARNING: unrecognized option
Tom Lane writes:
> What happens in packages using a (possibly old) autoconf script that
> doesn't recognize --disable-silent-rules?
Autoconf-generated configure scripts generally ignore unknown --enable
and --with options (newer versions give a warning).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@red
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:40:58 +0200
> Johannes Lips wrote:
>
>> Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just
>> let me know.
>
> Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in as:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:23:51 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
...snip...
> > Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in as:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abiword-2.8.6-12.fc16
> >
> > Please test and add karma.
>
> Done
Thanks!
> > Also, please wait to rebuild with link
After looking into it I think the root issue is that the block devices are
incorrectly named in new 2.6.40-4 kernel. I created an issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729340
--Marek
On 9 sie 2011, at 17:02, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:52:56 AM M
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
> Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
> their Makefiles for "developer convenience"; the goal being that they
> see warnings more easily.
It is inconvenient as one can no longer easily reproduce the compilation
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
> the goal being that they see warnings more easily.
You should make -Werror default instead, by compiling packages without -Werror
various bugs creep in which would be much easier fixed before the compilation.
Regards,
Jan
--
devel maili
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 18:56 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
> > the goal being that they see warnings more easily.
>
> You should make -Werror default instead, by compiling packages without -Werror
> various bugs creep in which would be much
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:56:21PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
> > the goal being that they see warnings more easily.
>
> You should make -Werror default instead, by compiling packages without -Werror
> various bugs creep in which would b
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious
> warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then
> sure.
Yes, I do it for my component, GDB has -Werror default in development phases
upstream. It cleans
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:16:54 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Never, ever ship software with -Werror enabled.
I agree - for source distribution. Yes, GDB releases have -Werror turned off.
> It's a development-only
> option. You have no idea what gcc will decide is a warning in future, so
> it'
On 08/09/2011 07:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
>> their Makefiles for "developer convenience"; the goal being that they
>> see warnings more easily.
>
> It is inconvenien
Here's what I got trying to use retrace server for crash of inkscape:
Retrace job failed
Analyzing crash data OK
Initializing virtual root OK
Generating backtrace Error
Unable to chmod the executable
(exited with 1)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:39:55 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Please reread the whole message; this passage only reasons why various
> UPSTREAMS have chosen to use silent rules. The patch is all about
> globally enabling the verbose mode, exactly the same you were proposing
> in the kernel ticket.
OK,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:16:54 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It's a development-only
> > option. You have no idea what gcc will decide is a warning in future, so
> > it's effectively a "Please break my build in six months" toggle
On 08/09/2011 07:19 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious
>> warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then
>> sure.
>
> Yes, I do it for my component, GDB has -Wer
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious
> > warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then
> > sure.
>
> Yes, I do it for my componen
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:45:15 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> If a package fails to build in a mass rebuild because -Werror was enabled
> then that's additional work for several people to fix something that may not
> have ever actually been broken.
99% of warnings will not lead to user visible bugs
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
> Done.
Still having no luck submitting this as an update via bodhi. I get:
bojan does not have commit access to cvsgraph
Anyone knows what else is required for a package to be submitted as an update?
It seems that commit access on the branch is not sufficient.
54 matches
Mail list logo
