Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:40 PM, jonathan MERCIER
wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
>> wrote:
>> > Apart from RC2->final, the other changes are:
>> ...
>> > - enabling multilib
the spec says:
$XDG_CONFIG_DIRS/menus/applications-merged/
The default merge directories included in the
element. By convention, third parties may add new files in this
location to create their own sub-menus.
Note that a system that uses either gnome-applications.menu or
kde-applications.menu d
how can we debug this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728889
I tried the following js in firebug/firefox
var d=new Date;
alert(Date.toLocaleFormat());
alert(Date.toLocaleFormat("%Y-%m-%d"));
we need to test
Shell.util_format_date(format, this.getTime());
I tried gjs and js comm
Compose started at Mon Aug 8 08:15:40 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12
Hello,
In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
filed against it, let me announce this as clearly as possible
BTRFS WILL NOT BE THE D
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 13:38 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> how can we debug this bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728889
>
> I tried the following js in firebug/firefox
>
> var d=new Date;
> alert(Date.toLocaleFormat());
> alert(Date.toLocaleFormat("%Y-%m-%d"));
>
> we need to t
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
> slow going process. With your help we will be in a better situation
> for F17. Thanks,
So, no increase of your
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
>> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
>> slow going process. With your help we will be in a better
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el5' was created pointing to:
3ac6681... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el6' was created pointing to:
3ac6681... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
>>> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
>>> slow goin
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
working very hard on
Re-review needed after package name change and added Obsoletes:
Will swap a review.
bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050
Spec URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/hekafs.spec
SRPM URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/hekafs-0.7-7.fc15.src.rpm
Thanks,
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 08/08/2011 01:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
> hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
> Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
> filed against it, let me announc
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011 @22:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting is calle
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
perl()
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
perl()
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-
Compose started at Mon Aug 8 13:15:54 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On 08/08/2011 08:15 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
>
> Wednesday, August 10, 2011 @22:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
My mistake - 21:00 UTC. 17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT still applies.
-Robyn
___
tl;dr version: If you have a security-sensitive package, and wish to
enable some gcc-level hardening features with a modest performance
impact, you will soon be able to enable them (nearly) automagically by
rebuilding with this line in your spec file:
%define _hardened_build 1
Now for the deta
Hello,
The build deps of xmedcon have all been packaged. Would someone please
swap reviews with me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328
Bug 714328 - (xmedcon) Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image
conversion utility and library
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I appreciate those who will continue to use it a
Hello,
Would anyone want to swap reviews with me? I need this reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180
Bug 715180 - (FreeMat) Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for
rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
It would be a real good addition to th
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following pa
Hello,
gnumed-server is already available in the fedora repositories. Adding
gnumed-client would complete the set.
Would someone please swap reviews with me on this one too?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757
Bug 728757 - (gnumed) Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
--
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik
Hi
I am working on to package python-pylibmc [0], Please tell me how to handle
soname for this package.
[0]
http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pylibmc/python-pylibmc-1.2.0-1.20110805gitf01c31.fc15.src.rpm
[1] http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pylibmc/python-pylibmc.spec
Thanks and Regards
P
On 08/08/2011 07:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
RAID-5 on btrfs as well if you don't mind?
>>>
>>> It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
>>> for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind speci
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-08-07)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 17:01:26 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-08/fesco.2011-08-08-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Farkas Levente wrote:
> something better. there is no roadmap, who is responsible for what which
> is the planed kernel version, how do you plane raid-5/6 integration etc...
You mean, like this[1]?
[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Fennec/Milestones/8.0#Features_Tracked
--
devel mailing list
devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Vars:
4ce99ba8318634a16a04e59b20cc5798 Test-Vars-0.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
commit 5e27442df887757bec5f7b20eeca19a2dab5c30c
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon Aug 8 19:26:06 2011 +0100
Initial import (perl-Test-Vars-0.001-2)
Test::Vars finds unused variables in order to keep the source code tidy.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Vars.spec | 56 +
Summary of changes:
7b470c7... Fix sample script permissions in %prep rather than %install (*)
0574e06... Drop Test::Exception version requirement to 0.26 (*)
528da85... Tidy up old changelog entries (*)
74b686b... Minor spec file clean-ups (*)
3ac6681... Run the release tests too (*)
(
On 08/08/2011 05:44 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
> hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
> Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
> filed against it, let me announc
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el4' was created pointing to:
3ac6681... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Summary of changes:
5e27442... Initial import (perl-Test-Vars-0.001-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:25 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working on to package python-pylibmc [0], Please tell me how to
> handle soname for this package.
>
> [0]
> http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pylibmc/python-pylibmc-1.2.0-1.20110805gitf01c31.fc15.src.rpm
> [1] http://kumarpr
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:36:59 +0530
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is what rpmlint says about it:
>
> > python-pylibmc.i686: W:
> > private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_pylibmc.so
>
> Could someone please direct us to the correct way of handling this
> please?
I have two packages that need to be reviewed:
* gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
( This one is a bit colorful, but it should be easy enough to review. )
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203
* freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
https://bugzill
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please update Tuareg to version 2.0.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729130
Summary: Please update Tuareg to version 2.0.4
Product: Fedo
Tom Callaway wrote:
> I have two packages that need to be reviewed:
>
> * gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
> ( This one is a bit colorful, but it should be easy enough to review. )
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203
>
> * freewrl - X3D / VRML visua
tl;dr version: If you have a security-sensitive package, and wish to
enable some gcc-level hardening features with a modest performance
impact, you will soon be able to enable them (nearly) automagically by
rebuilding with this line in your spec file:
%define _hardened_build 1
Now for the deta
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:23:43PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> %define _hardened_build 1
just wondering: Is %define really correct here or does it need to be
%global?
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517299&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hello there,
It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well.
thank you
Chitlesh
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
>> It's that
found the reason
the following line worked
Shell.util_format_date("%a %l:%M %p", new Date().getTime());
but the following gave null
Shell.util_format_date(_("%a %l:%M %p"), new Date().getTime());
all _("...") worked except this above line
the reason behind this was
_("%a %l:%M %p")
evaluates to
%
Hi,
Feel free to propose a bug on gnome-menus at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> where should I put my .menu file to create a new menu under applications ?
You're probably right about the specification from looking at it quickly.
> and does th
Hey, folks.
So lately Firefox has been crashing a ton for me on F16 (and Evolution's
been disappearing silently too - bet it's the same cause). Today I fired
it up from a console and found out what the error was:
"__libc_res_nquery: Assertion `hp != hp2' failed."
then I tried to use Epiphany for
On 8/8/11 3:52 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:23:43PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> %define _hardened_build 1
>
> just wondering: Is %define really correct here or does it need to be
> %global?
I've been using %define out of habit, but either one works.
- ajax
--
devel mail
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 12:23 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you've made it to the end, congratulations. Please let me know if
> there are any issues, or any questions I can answer. In particular if
> the performance impact of these flags is excessive for you, there are
> some ways it can be m
> * 3: what does this mean for you?
... and your users, and your software maintenance budget:
If you enable it, then the apps in your package:
1) Cannot be prelink-ed. This likely costs time and space (RAM, swap)
at run time. The magnitude of the cost can vary from almost nothing
to several se
On Monday, August 08, 2011 12:23:43 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> * 2: how do we go about doing it?
> All of this is only an issue because most build systems don't let you
> say different CFLAGS or LDFLAGS for shared libraries and executables.
> Sigh.
>
> So instead, we'll teach gcc to figure it out.
Just a quick note that I just built link-grammar for f17 and f16. So
abiword should be able to depend on it again!
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
54 matches
Mail list logo
