TASAKA Mamoru (mtas...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > Orphan kazehakase
>
> I am the current (orignal) owner of kazehakase and now I fixed
> the build (FTBFS issue). Any other action needed?
Nope, the FTBFS will be re-checked against what's built in
dist-f16 before we retire anything.
Bill
--
de
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do
> have working ACPI lid support? I realize maintaining such a list is
> a pain, but this way people who care and are lucky enough to have actually
> working hardware can at l
Hello all,
I've orphaned idesk.
Upstream is long dead and I'm currently do not have the necessary free
time to get it to work under Fedora 15.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 10:57 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> I create a new package.
>> At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
>> preconfigure the application.
> rpm-based installations are supposed to be non-interactive, i.e. this
commit 6a58efa8d736d5fdcebbe1ce3928b6f3f36c4367
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Jul 13 18:11:43 2011 +0200
drop obsolete BRs
perl-Net-SSLeay.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec b/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec
index 9c5b9fb..35
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:06:37PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> >
> > New this go-round is that we are also blocki
Summary of changes:
e046513... drop circular build deps (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I create a new package.
> At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
> preconfigure the application.
As others have said, this is a bad idea and not permitted for Fedora.
Personally I think it's a misfeature of apt
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 09:40 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newby regarding rpm packaging (more used to deb packaging).
> I want to know if there is a way to configure a package at install using
> rpmdev stuff, like debconf in Debian.
> Or do we need to create our own config script m
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:21 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:01:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 23:44 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > I'm curious to know how many laptops have problems with
> > > ACPI lid state in Linu
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> > Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do
> > have working ACPI lid support? I realize maintaining such a list is
> > a pain, but this way people who care
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do
> > > have working ACPI lid support? I realize
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Oh, and depending on how it was implemented, it would provide a way for
> competent users to manually add their own systems to the whitelist and
> enable lid state functionality if they were happy with its performance
> on their particular
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-07-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Hard to believe, but the "vacation" is over. Fedora 16 Alpha test
compose is a few weeks away (Jul 26) and the Alpha is about a month
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
> Orphan gtranslator
> comaintained by: tbzatek
I'm interested in this application.
If co-maintainer does not take it, I'd like to take it over.
I'm not yet a Fedora package maintainer, only have proposed a couple of
packages, that have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
commit 9424dcf0793d78e198c379aa8aac31d9685b17ba
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:28:54 2011 -0600
start as dspam user
dspam-init.d| 13 ++---
dspam-sysconfig |3 ++-
dspam.spec |5 -
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff -
Summary of changes:
d28a6b7... remove configure patch since bash is fixed (*)
345c5db... rebuilt for libmysqlclient soname bump (*)
18bcc05... added tmpfiles & rpath fix (*)
9424dcf... start as dspam user (*)
bda6641... Merge branch 'f15' into f14
(*) This commit already existed in anot
commit bda66417ac5ea90bd6ce2978735dfdef02842826
Merge: df00717 9424dcf
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:29:53 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'f15' into f14
dspam-3.9.0-configure.patch | 194 ---
dspam-init.d| 13 ++--
dspa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720295
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Summary of changes:
d28a6b7... remove configure patch since bash is fixed (*)
345c5db... rebuilt for libmysqlclient soname bump (*)
18bcc05... added tmpfiles & rpath fix (*)
9424dcf... start as dspam user (*)
3327938... Merge branch 'f15' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in anot
commit 33279386edb873e3b21f95c295a230245dca45b3
Merge: 6b8829c 9424dcf
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:30:44 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'f15' into el6
dspam-3.9.0-configure.patch | 194 ---
dspam-init.d| 13 ++--
dspa
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Doing manual tweaking on many machines is not fun
That's when you bring out Kickstart I believe.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Summary of changes:
8af1ab0... fix changelog date
32229ad... Merge branch 'f15' into el5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit 8af1ab0019b6c29f3c49a366aec325621c2d8432
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:47:56 2011 -0600
fix changelog date
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 93255a3..327195e 100644
--- a/dspam.spe
commit 32229ad7abd5a4ddc6b750dbd54b68ce5bdb2970
Merge: dcc8ee4 8af1ab0
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:51:16 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'f15' into el5
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject
Summary of changes:
8af1ab0... fix changelog date (*)
46b8530... Merge branch 'f15' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
commit 46b853046cbe36b651fda266a467b99ebfc3894a
Merge: 3327938 8af1ab0
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:50:59 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'f15' into el6
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject
Summary of changes:
8af1ab0... fix changelog date (*)
8529418... Merge branch 'f15' into f14
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
commit 8529418be37c3a202b472854aa24630137b6fcf1
Merge: bda6641 8af1ab0
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:50:38 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'f15' into f14
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject
Summary of changes:
8af1ab0... fix changelog date (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Summary of changes:
8af1ab0... fix changelog date (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:50:58PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 11.07.11 13:20, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > they are handling the systemd conversation... What other
> > distro are planing to use it?
>
> I lost track of this a bit, but MeeGo already switched, and M
Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
I've been having with
the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
wanted the developers to
know what kind of troubles I've been experiencing with this FS in F15 so
they can take a look
at them in ord
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
> I've been having with
> the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
> wanted the developers to
> know what kind of troubles I've been expe
2011/7/13 Josef Bacik
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Escudero
> wrote:
> > Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
> > I've been having with
> > the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
> > wanted the developers to
> > kno
On 07/13/2011 11:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>> Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
>> I've been having with
>> the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
>> wanted the develope
Farkas Levente wrote:
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no
reason to slip it one release.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 16:54:44 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
> > if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> > as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
>
> If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IM
Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck. I'm
>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
>> slow going process.
>
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default
Am 13.07.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
>> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
>
> If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no
> re
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:26:25AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:06:37PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > > It's that time a
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.07.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
>>> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
>>
>> If f16 gets ke
On 7/13/11 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck. I'm
>>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
>>> slow going process.
>>
>> if you said that this's the current st
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> I create a new package.
>> At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
>> preconfigure the application.
>
> As others have said, this is a bad idea and n
Hi
As discussed in this list earlier, I along with several others (see
wiki page for details) have been working on packaging Askbot
(http://askbot.org) and its
dependencies for Fedora (and EPEL). Askbot is a question and answer
oriented forum along the lines of Stack Overflow and I would like t
2011/7/13 Eric Sandeen
> On 7/13/11 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
> >>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck. I'm
> >>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
> >>> slow going process.
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> > > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
>> > > for Fedora 16?
>> > >
>> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdumprd
>> >
>> Feature proposal
Most Ubuntu and Debian packages, are indeed silent by default. However, the
fact that RPM's own post-install capabilities are atrocious compared to
dpkg's is completely the fault of the RPM developers and maintainers, and
has a lot to do with distro policies, in particular Fedora. It is something
t
Hi,
I recently found that startup-notification is quite old in fedora and
filed a bug to update to the recent upstream version. [1]
So far I didn't get any feedback and would like to ask if someone of
those [2] who also have commit on this package could update it or
explain what the reason for
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan perl-Danga-Socket
> Orphan perl-Sys-Syscall
I've taken those two in Fedora; EPEL is still available.
--
# Petr Sabata
pgpBHMFr09km4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan python-igraph
I'll take this one, looks like something I could play with.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I am a newby regarding rpm packaging (more used to deb packaging).
I want to know if there is a way to configure a package at install using
rpmdev stuff, like debconf in Debian.
Or do we need to create our own config script management?
Thanks
Olivier
--
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of
On 07/13/2011 01:10 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newby regarding rpm packaging (more used to deb packaging).
> I want to know if there is a way to configure a package at install using
> rpmdev stuff, like debconf in Debian.
> Or do we need to create our own config script management?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The fo
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:22:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
> >
> > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > rated game. gdk
I create a new package.
At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
preconfigure the application.
At upgrade, it would be nice to get already answered questions rather
than ask again for configuration.
This can be managed manually, but it would be nicer to get this managed
with pac
On 2011-07-12, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan perl-Gearman
> Orphan perl-Gearman-Client-Async
> Orphan perl-Gearman-Server
> Orphan perl-MogileFS-Client
> Orphan perl-MogileFS-Utils
> Orphan perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders
> Orphan perl-mogilefs-server
> Orphan root-tail
Fedora branches overtaken. EP
Sorry for not quoting. On github exists a little application
rpm-gen-configuration or so that can create an rpm from configuration data. It
generate automatically the deps required and it is safe regarding conflict and
upgrade. Dunno if can useful to you. Best regards
Messaggio originale
On 07/13/2011 10:57 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I create a new package.
> At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
> preconfigure the application.
rpm-based installations are supposed to be non-interactive, i.e. this is
not allowed.
> At upgrade, it would be nice to get alread
2011/7/12 Bill Nottingham :
> Orphan fvwm
> comaintained by: pertusus
Took this one.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The fo
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:10 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718190
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:10:01 PM Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The follow
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:30 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > Orphan gpointing-device-settings
> >
> > This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
>
> Orphan scitools
I'm going to take this
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:10 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan netsniff-ng
> comaintained by: fab
No more orphaned. I've grabbed it Fedora+EPEL.
Skalnik
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Orphan spyder
> comaintained by: rnovacek
I have taken spyder, as I'm comaintainer.
Radek Novacek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:01:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 23:44 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I'm curious to know how many laptops have problems with
> > ACPI lid state in Linux. I've been told some laptops report
> > wrong lid state through ACPI
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:44:59PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > I guess that should cover all the usecases..
> > Please post your findings to this list.
>
> Please don't. ACPI lid state is not reliable on a range of hardwar
> Orphan etherape
I take it
--
JFCh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello, Fedora people,
Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
for Fedora 16?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdumprd
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:31:39PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> Hello, Fedora people,
>
> Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
> for Fedora 16?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdumprd
In case anyone was wondering, Américo also addressed this to me
because I
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:46:30AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:31:39PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> > Hello, Fedora people,
> >
> > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
> > for Fedora 16?
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdum
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
> > > for Fedora 16?
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdumprd
> >
> Feature proposal dealing was yesterday?
deadline, of course.
--
Tomasz T
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:46:30AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:31:39PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> > Hello, Fedora people,
> >
> > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
> > for Fedora 16?
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewMkdum
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:22 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Please don't. ACPI lid state is not reliable on a range of hardware for
> > a bunch of reasons, ranging from open events that are never fired to
> > query methods that
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:54 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Dang line wrapping :)
>
> Here's another version using "LIBRARIES_SOVERSION" instead. Didn't see
> it the first time.
>
> http://pastebin.com/8wQeM6XQ
>
> Richard
Hi Richard,
That didn't work either :/
I decided to hack it down, and no
On 07/13/2011 05:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 10:57 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> This can be managed manually, but it would be nicer to get this managed
>> with packaging tools.
> rpm-based systems' philosophy is to let users configure their systems
> after package installations/upd
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:54 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> That didn't work either :/
I was going purely by the patch and I'm certainly not a cmake expert
but this did work for me on a new package I'm working on...
> I decided
Hi,
On 07/13/2011 04:11 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:22 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Please don't. ACPI lid state is not reliable on a range of hardware for
>>> a bunch of reasons, ranging from open even
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 09:30 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:54 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > That didn't work either :/
>
> I was going purely by the patch and I'm certainly not a cmake expert
> but
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695597
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Bill Nottingham wrote, at 07/13/2011 06:10 AM +9:00:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packag
86 matches
Mail list logo
