Re: Heads-up: net-snmp soname bump in rawhide

2011-07-08 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday 07 of July 2011 15:23:19 Jan Safranek wrote: > net-snmp-5.7 is heading to rawhide, please rebuild your packages if you > depend on it. > > $ repoquery --whatrequires net-snmp-libs net-snmp net-snmp-devel > net-snmp-perl net-snmp-python --alldeps -s | sort | uniq > ... > apcupsd done .

Lack of space on /

2011-07-08 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Something strange has happened on my system. At the start of last week, / was reporting that I had about 8Gb free. It now reports that / is completely full. chkrootkit is reporting nothing untoward. I have noticed that putting things in the wastebasket and then saying empty hasn't been doing

Re: Lack of space on /

2011-07-08 Thread Jos Vos
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:47:13AM +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Something strange has happened on my system. At the start of last > week, / was reporting that I had about 8Gb free. It now reports that / > is completely full. Wrong list, I think, this is the Fedora DEVELOPMENT list. -- --

Re: Lack of space on /

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/7/8 Paul F. Johnson : > Hi, > > Something strange has happened on my system. At the start of last > week, / was reporting that I had about 8Gb free. It now reports that / > is completely full. > > chkrootkit is reporting nothing untoward. > > I have noticed that putting things in the wastebask

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:57:54PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working > together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts > into systemd services. Here is the long trail... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-07-08 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
On 07/06/2011 10:43 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:23:06AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> I no longer have a need/care for these packages, they are up for grabs: >> >> contacts >> inotail > I'll take inotail. > > --CJD Just for the note - there tailf util in util-linux package

Re: Heads-up: net-snmp soname bump in rawhide

2011-07-08 Thread Jan Safranek
On 07/07/2011 09:19 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Jan Safranek wrote: >> net-snmp-5.7 is heading to rawhide, please rebuild your packages if you >> depend on it. >> >> asterisk > > I haven't dug into this deeply yet, but this seems to have broken the > asterisk build.

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread JB
Steve Dickson redhat.com> writes: > ... Hi, you are right about the synchronization problem within a service file exec environment, at least as you showed it in that particular Bugzilla case. Let's review it once again here (I am on F15), but I reserve the right to be wrong as I have mostly i

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/08/2011 10:47 AM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:57:54PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working >> together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts >> into systemd services. Here is the long trail... >> >>

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/08/2011 11:42 AM, JB wrote: > Hi, > > you are right about the synchronization problem within a service file exec > environment, at least as you showed it in that particular Bugzilla case. > No he did not and you are wrong the problem has nothing to do with order timing and execution but e

Re: Lack of space on /

2011-07-08 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/08/2011 04:47 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > Something strange has happened on my system. At the start of last > week, / was reporting that I had about 8Gb free. It now reports that / > is completely full. > .. > > Any ideas? > Probably should be users list not dev (unless you're

rawhide report: 20110708 changes

2011-07-08 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jul 8 08:15:10 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 07.07.11 22:57, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hello, > > One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working > together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts > into systemd services. Here is the long trail... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 08.07.11 06:47, Neil Horman (nhor...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:57:54PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working > > together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts > > into systemd services. He

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread JB
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes: > > On 07/08/2011 11:42 AM, JB wrote: > > Hi, > > > > you are right about the synchronization problem within a service file exec > > environment, at least as you showed it in that particular Bugzilla case. > > > > > > No he did not and you are wrong th

biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Kevin Wilson
Hello, I have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_64 on fedora 15 machine. I see from man biosdevname , that the name of the devices should be: .. em for embedded NICs pci#_ for cards in PCI slots .. ifconfig shows I have em1, p2p1; indded em1 is embedded NICs.

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/08/2011 12:41 PM, JB wrote: > Johann, > I think you are "fixing" it to work according to your world view :-) > Nope > $ man sysctl > ... > SYNOPSIS > ... > sysctl [-n] [-e] [-q] -w variable=value ... > ... > > So, if nfslock.service file contains: > ... > ExecStart=/sbin/sysctl -w f

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 07/08/2011 08:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 07.07.11 22:57, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working >> together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts >> into systemd services. Here is the long

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread JB
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes: > > On 07/08/2011 12:41 PM, JB wrote: > > Johann, > > I think you are "fixing" it to work according to your world view > > > > Nope > > > $ man sysctl > > ... > > SYNOPSIS > > ... > > sysctl [-n] [-e] [-q] -w variable=value ... > > ... > > > >

File MIME-Charset-1.009.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by xavierb

2011-07-08 Thread Xavier Bachelot
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-Charset: ee982e66423738b1b13f45cdde4fe1cf MIME-Charset-1.009.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

[perl-MIME-Charset] Update to 1.009.1

2011-07-08 Thread Xavier Bachelot
commit 9e404739ce61febdbddce56a873367f6b1c50269 Author: Xavier Bachelot Date: Fri Jul 8 16:16:14 2011 +0200 Update to 1.009.1 .gitignore |1 + perl-MIME-Charset.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff

releasing ownership of coda stack

2011-07-08 Thread Adam Goode
Hi, I have not used Coda in some time, so I am going to release ownership of items in the coda stack. The only concern is that EPEL packages won't have an owner, but Coda itself isn't supported there because of the missing kernel module. Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

orphaning fvwm and libstroke

2011-07-08 Thread Adam Goode
Hi, I am orphaning fvwm and libstroke. It's been fun! Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 712038] perl-MIME-Charset-1.009.1 is available

2011-07-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712038 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: orphaning fvwm and libstroke

2011-07-08 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! 2011/7/8 Adam Goode : > Hi, > > I am orphaning fvwm and libstroke. It's been fun! I'm using fvwm (and thus libstroke) so I could take care of both. Any other volunteers? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Hello, > I have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_64 on fedora 15 machine. > > I see from > man biosdevname , that the name of the devices should be: > .. > em > for embedded NICs > > pci#_ > for cards in PCI sl

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:13 +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Hello, > I have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_64 on fedora 15 machine. > > I see from > man biosdevname , that the name of the devices should be: > .. > em > for embedded NICs > >pci#_ > for cards in

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Adam Williamson wrote: >> ifconfig shows I have em1, p2p1; >> Why does it not defined as pci#? > The man page is out of date. pciXp_Y got changed to pXpY, I believe > because it turned out to be important that the names be kept below a > certain length. I also have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_6

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 07/08/2011 03:57 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > On 07/08/2011 08:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> So, I'd suggest strongly not to try starting all services from a single >> file. There's a reason why we explicitly forbid having more than one >> ExecStart= in a unit file (except for Type=oneshot s

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 08.07.11 09:57, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > > I am pretty sure systemd-devel is the better place to discuss this. But > > here are a few comments after reading throught the bug report: > I didn't know it existed... That would have been the first big free software project w

File CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.20.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication: 5b4ff96b2f703b11bae13308aee7bd30 CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.f

[perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication] Update to 0.20, add new BuildRequires and clean up spec file

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit cfafb990bf1cac77366c3fc40c68981ebd6c1605 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Fri Jul 8 17:00:09 2011 +0200 Update to 0.20, add new BuildRequires and clean up spec file .gitignore |1 + perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication.spec | 18 +++

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/08/2011 10:06 AM, JB wrote: > > This entry is passed to systemd for execution, as is ! > It is the responsibility of systemd to parse it, determine what entry it is > (you could put in there any garbage, perhaps a virus, rootkit, etc), then if > a valid executable entry then it should valid

Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm working on making a package of OpenImageIO[1] which is used by a new branch of blender, blender-cycles[2], which uses the cycles rendering engine[3]. There appears to be one bundled library, pugixml[4] but it's only 3 files (1 c, and 2 header files) and doesn't not compile on it's own. It look

File CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.4.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM: 39a1677de948fc9db519bf38fd645716 CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.4.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje

[perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM] Update to 2.4 and clean up spec file

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit a41ce51aa2e59eb1dec7c8119bf8e4293386fc91 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Fri Jul 8 17:13:55 2011 +0200 Update to 2.4 and clean up spec file .gitignore |1 + perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM.spec | 17 - sources

File Config-Auto-0.36.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Auto: e49f1314ee58972c91792977e9a99776 Config-Auto-0.36.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

File Sys-Virt-0.9.2.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2011-07-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt: 7dbf47975e43a6debce21ca8034fa0ab Sys-Virt-0.9.2.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

[perl-Config-Auto] Update to 0.36 and clean up spec file

2011-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 1edb46ee4e01a7a869006eedd1ac18092f75dd91 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Fri Jul 8 17:23:47 2011 +0200 Update to 0.36 and clean up spec file .gitignore|1 + perl-Config-Auto.spec | 19 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertio

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 0.9.2 release

2011-07-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
commit 7570972b5966dc2786ebf78d794a00f8c357a7af Author: Daniel P. Berrange Date: Fri Jul 8 16:24:24 2011 +0100 Update to 0.9.2 release sources |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/sources b/sources index 05aa6c5..858a756 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/so

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 0.9.2 release

2011-07-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
commit 8b8ec5e921508c67e649a7ae4468f0b80b4987d2 Author: Daniel P. Berrange Date: Fri Jul 8 16:25:47 2011 +0100 Update to 0.9.2 release perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +-- sources|1 - 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt.spec b/per

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:45 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> ifconfig shows I have em1, p2p1; > >> Why does it not defined as pci#? > > > The man page is out of date. pciXp_Y got changed to pXpY, I believe > > because it turned out to be important that the names

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Adam Williamson wrote: > That would indicate your BIOS doesn't have the necessary support; quite > a few don't. There's some notes on what's needed for biosdevname to work > at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-01-27_Network_Device_Nami ng_With_Biosdevname#Hardware_Requirements I

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Tom Hughes
On 08/07/11 17:02, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > I ran the script, output: > > Checking hardware requirements [ OK ] > Checking for SMBIOS type 41 support[FAILED] > Checking for SMBIOS type 9 support [ OK ] > Checking

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:02 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > That would indicate your BIOS doesn't have the necessary support; > quite > > a few don't. There's some notes on what's needed for biosdevname to > work > > at > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab : > Use valgrind. I attach valgrind output. ==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116: ==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef1593, 76) ==1312==at 0x4C283B6: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14 (mc_replace_strmem.c:653) ==1312==by 0x401835: ??? (in /sbin

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Tom Hughes wrote: > Did you upgrade this machine from an earlier version of Fedora? If so > then I suspect the old names will stick because you will have udev > persistent naming rules for them. No, I did a clean install. I installed a week before the first Test Candidate for the first Release C

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 8 lipca 2011 18:21 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > 2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab : >> Use valgrind. > > I attach valgrind output. > > ==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116: > ==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef1593, 76) > ==1312==    at 0x4C283B6: me

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread JB
Genes MailLists sapience.com> writes: > ... Yes, it is a little bit harsh. I was not precise by mentioning systemd only with regard to entry validation. I should have said systemd (by its own code or that from any utilities) or the called app itself. Having said that, there is probably a need

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on making a package of OpenImageIO[1] which is used by a > new branch of blender, blender-cycles[2], which uses the cycles > rendering engine[3]. > > There appears to be one bundled library, pugixml[4] but it's only 3 > fi

RE: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Shyam_Iyer
> -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Petrus de Calguarium > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 12:22 PM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsist

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Steve Clark
On 07/08/2011 12:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 8 lipca 2011 18:21 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: Hi, 2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab: Use valgrind. I attach valgrind output. ==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116: ==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef159

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc. So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it. The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaround buggy old programs was just for programs linked against old glibc. If y

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/7/8 Jakub Jelinek : > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >> So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc. > > So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it. > The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaround > buggy old programs was just for prog

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Steve Clark
On 07/08/2011 01:19 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/7/8 Jakub Jelinek: On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc. So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it. The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaro

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

2011-07-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > memove should be used if areas overlap that are being copied. If they overlap or may overlap. Jakub -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > The tarball (I actually downloaded the zip but I hope that upstream made the > tarball contain identical files :-)  seems to compile fine on its own: > > cd scripts > cmake CMakeLists.txt > make > ls -al libpugixml.a > -rw-rw-r--. 1 badger

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, another question. I edited the CMakeLists.txt and changed the "STATIC" to "SHARED" and it compiled without issue creating a shared library. Is there any down side to doing this? I guess now I have something for the pugixml package and then can create a -devel subpackage with the header file an

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm working on making a package of OpenImageIO[1] which is used by a >> new branch of blender, blender-cycles[2], which uses the cycles >> rendering engine[3]. >> >> There app

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jon Masters
[ removing extraneous copy of old Fedora devel list ] On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:57 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > On 07/08/2011 08:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > I am pretty sure systemd-devel is the better place to discuss this. But > > here are a few comments after reading throught the bug

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, another question. I edited the CMakeLists.txt and changed the > "STATIC" to "SHARED" and it compiled without issue creating a shared > library. Is there any down side to doing this? > > I guess now I have something for the pugixml

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Ok, another question. I edited the CMakeLists.txt and changed the >> "STATIC" to "SHARED" and it compiled without issue creating a shared >> library. Is there any down side to

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 08.07.11 14:52, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote: > > > I am pretty sure systemd-devel is the better place to discuss this. But > > > here are a few comments after reading throught the bug report: > > I didn't know it existed... > > My $0.02 on this is that this conversation *

Re: Development only package?

2011-07-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:50:34PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > What about the case where the upstream tarball is not directly capable > of generating a dynamic or static library? > This would not be a guarantee that it is okay to bundle the library. It would be one indicator but not the most

Need Support For Hardware & Live Usb Issue + Bugs version 0.1

2011-07-08 Thread Navdeep Singh Sidhu
I have Dell Xps 15 with config:- 8 Gb RAM 2nd generation i7 processor 2.2 GHz Boost 2.0 upto 3.30 GHz Dual Graphics Card Intel HD 3000 & nvidia geforce GT 540M with Optimus Techonology 720 GB hardisk Motherboard Dell XPS system L502X Intel centrino 6230 Network Card with BT 3.0 I have installed 2

Need Support For Hardware & Live Usb Issue + Bugs version 0.1

2011-07-08 Thread Navdeep Singh Sidhu
I have Dell Xps 15 with config:- 8 Gb RAM 2nd generation i7 processor 2.2 GHz Boost 2.0 upto 3.30 GHz Dual Graphics Card Intel HD 3000 & nvidia geforce GT 540M with Optimus Techonology 720 GB hardisk Motherboard Dell XPS system L502X Intel centrino 6230 Network Card with BT 3.0 I have installed 2

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > This is not really about packaging, more about writing unit files. Since > unit files are intended to be included upstream this is better discussed > on systemd-devel. There is some benefit in making it possible for distribution package

Outage: Cleanup of Red Hat located systems - 2011-07-11 20:00 UTC

2011-07-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Outage: Cleanup of Red Hat located systems - 2011-07-11 20:00 UTC To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2011-07-11 20:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We will be removing old systems and putting in new ones at the Red

RE: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
shyam_i...@dell.com wrote: > Can you create a BZ with the following output.. ? > > sudo /sbin/biosdevname -d > sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode > sudo /usr/sbin/biosdecode > lspci -tv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720068 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Comaintaining and/or help for qucs and freehdl

2011-07-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200, Eric Tanguy wrote: > At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl > appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have an error about > rpath and i don't know how to solve it : > Could you help me for this problem also ? I did a local bui

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Kevin Wilson
Hi, thanks for your answer. I had looked in the rpm and I suppose you mean this file: /lib/udev/rules.d/71-biosdevname.rules it doesn't talk pci ports/slots, but your explanation of biosdevname is enough for me, I hope the man page will be updated in the future. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Pe

Re: Comaintaining and/or help for qucs and freehdl

2011-07-08 Thread Eric Tanguy
Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200, >Eric Tanguy wrote: >> At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl >> appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have an error about >> rpath and i don't know how to solve it : >> Could