Hi,
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
32-bit system
string(19) "2011-06-27 09:17:10" int(1309159030) string(19)
"2100-01-01 01:01:01" bool(false)
64-bit system
string(19) "201
2011/6/27 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
> work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
> conversion?
Where is the difference ... overflowing the 32bit integer due to the
current date being past 2038 or by
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716174
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
2011/6/27 drago01 :
> 2011/6/27 Michał Piotrowski :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
>> work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
>> conversion?
>
> Where is the difference ... overflowing the 32bit integer due to the
> cur
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
> work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
> conversion?
If they use the system time_t, then no.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E
Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 14:37 +0200 schrieb Farkas Levente:
> On 06/17/2011 02:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I'm following the procedure at:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> >
> > Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701000
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I'll ping Jeroen in the meantime, but we are both very busy with out
> dayjob.
In that case approving one or all of the three people who have requested
commit access seems sensible.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-Tiny:
333727bed82ee70459bdc007a9a4fc2c YAML-Tiny-1.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
commit 4fdff80790478ec314a7c8044d1b564df6f0373f
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Mon Jun 27 10:49:13 2011 +0200
1.50 bump, cleanup, (build-time) dependencies corrected
.gitignore |1 +
perl-YAML-Tiny.spec | 31 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > I did a find_bind_mount() function as part of:
> > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddf6fb86
Note, be careful with st_dev, because:
* after
mount --bind /mnt/A /mnt/A
/mnt/A has
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
>> Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
>> Is this just security through obscurity?
>
> The purpose
> I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
> work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
> conversion?
Yes, if "simple date conversion" uses a 32-bit time_t and does not
check-and-correct for 32-bit wrap-around.
On a system which uses a 32-bit
Compose started at Mon Jun 27 08:15:38 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadmsslutil.so.1()(64bit)
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadminutil.so.1()(64bit)
acheck-0.5.1-
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I'm following the procedure at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
> e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
>
> https://bugzilla.
Toshio, I wan to take fcitx.
Fedora && Debian User, former Ubuntu User
My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info
Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager && Ambassador
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 0
Hi,
Good to have you back!
On 06/27/2011 01:53 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I'm following the procedure at:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>
>> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
>> e-
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
>>> Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
Those packages are already orphaned.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Liang Suilong wrote:
> Toshio, I wan to take fcitx.
> Fedora && Debian User, former Ubuntu User
> My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info
> Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager && Ambassador
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Use
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Elder Marco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created a new review request ( yad program -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150)
>
> This is my first package. So, if possible, could someone sponsor me?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Elder Marco
>
parece que ja te
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
> >>>
commit 3394a05a2aefe28fec9b1e2b847296375c4e7e22
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 27 16:11:50 2011 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PerlIO-locale.spec | 58 +++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 60 insertions
>
> For me the most important benefit is OS independent software, especially
> web browser.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
current philosophy seem
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:08:44 -0400
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley
> > wrote:
> > > On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> > On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> >> The purpose of the blob is to "measure" the system state; only the
>> >> blob
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 16:53 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> > On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> >> The purpose
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 16:53 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> The hardware manufacturer _only_ signs the sinit blob. Any kernel/OS
>> you use can be measured/"protected" by the TPM without an
2011/6/27 Miloslav Trmač :
> The hardware owner configures the TPM so that submitting specific
> "measurements" is required to use keys stored in the TPM.
To avoid a misunderstanding, "hardware owner" is "the customer", not
"hardware manufacturer".
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
> work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
> conversion?
Not if that "simple" date conversion uses the system time_t functions
(which most of the common fun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697694
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
>
> meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
I thought the decision at last meeting was 1700 UTC/1pm EDT?
Bill
--
devel mailing list
de
List,
This bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582798 has been
around since F12. It was a minor annoyance than which has now turned
into irritation. The fact that the sound menu is hidden deep inside in
F15 doesn't help.
Anyone know a workaround?
Jitesh
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:03:17AM +0200, V?t Ondruch wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I just want to note that your script is not listing the package owners
> correctly. There should be listed only people who have commit access,
> but there are listed also people who just watch bugzilla and commits,
> [1
On Mon, 27.06.11 09:25, Jitesh Shah (jitesh.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> List,
> This bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582798 has been
> around since F12. It was a minor annoyance than which has now turned
> into irritation. The fact that the sound menu is hidden deep inside in
> F15 do
..snip..
> Jack sensing is not really ready in the drivers yet. While many HDA
> drivers now support a jack sensing API via the Linux input subsystem PA
> does not make use of this and is unliekyl to anytime soon as most folks
> agree that misusing the input subsystem for jack sensing is a bad ide
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 12:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> >
> > meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
>
> I thought the decis
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Howarth"
> To: "Fedora perl development team"
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:41:37 PM
> Subject: Re: News from rebuild
> On 06/24/2011 02:41 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> > 2011/6/24 Marcela Mašláňová:
> >>
> >> Another thing are filters. I suppose it isn'
On Mon, 27.06.11 09:41, Jitesh Shah (jitesh.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> ..snip..
>
> > Jack sensing is not really ready in the drivers yet. While many HDA
> > drivers now support a jack sensing API via the Linux input subsystem PA
> > does not make use of this and is unliekyl to anytime soon as m
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 06/27/2011 07:52 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote
> Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
> current philosophy seems to be all packages are equal.
It really isn't
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
Rahul
--
de
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-06-27)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-06-27/fesco.2011-06-27-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:22 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I apologize for the long rant.
Well...trying to think of a diplomatic way to put it, but I'd say the
long rant is fine, but we've had the same discussion at least five times
over the last couple of years and your post didn't seem to bring
I have no use for these packages anymore, and didn't even really
remember I owned them, until Ralf jumped in and fixed a ftbfs bug
against isic filed all of 4 days ago without saying boo to me,
other than suggesting in the bug that the AWOL maintainer dance
be started after he'd already fixed the b
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good to have you back!
>
I'm still busy elsewhere. I was pointed in the direction of this thread by
someone else.
Consider those ACL requests that I could find approved.
--
Kind regards,
-- kanarip
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I'll ping Jeroen in the meantime, but we are both very busy with out
> > dayjob.
>
> In that case approving one or all of the three people who have requested
> commit access seems sensible.
Which package i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Change request (no review request ticket exists)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
Summary: Change request (no review request ticket exists)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-27 16:27:27 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
When I suspend or switch user gnome-screensaver should kick in (and
continue if successful).
It seems* instead that gnome-screensaver kicks in on resume, or when I
change back to the user.
* I see a flash of the user's screen or (sometimes) the screenlock
doesn't work at all.
Anyone know?
--
FESCo today approved a change to how orphan and deprecated packages are
handled in Fedora.
The prior policy was:
- Packages that have been orphaned for more than three months require
a re-review, regardless of whether or not they have been blocked.
The new policy is:
- Any package that is depre
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:09:40AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Below are the of packages which have outstanding FTBFS bugs from
> earlier Fedora releases. I've split them up by their 'dist' tag which
> shows when they were last successfully built.
>
> I recommend and propose to FESCo that all non
commit e11cf862689bc37512dc0570bcb6030ab506aa46
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Mon Jun 27 16:09:19 2011 -0600
remove and obsolete dspam-web
dspam.spec | 54 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspa
Just curious, did anyone try Cairo with OpenGL backend under Fedora
(i.e. so that components that use Cairo, such as GTK+ etc. all use
OpenGL for rendering)? If so, what was the experience like?
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 2011-06-26 12:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> And I have no idea what part of our update policy should be violated by
> this update. Please somebody enlighten me.
This part:
* Avoid changing the user experience if at all possible.
Specifically, the update breaks a number of user-installed ext
> * #531 Orphaned package ownership claiming clarification (sgallagh,
> 17:40:47)
> * AGREED: Policy will change to ""If a package is in orphan state in
> pkgdb, feel free to take it and revivie it, no re-review needed. If
> it's depreciated, you must re-review and get admins to unbl
Dne 27.6.2011 14:44, Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> Good to have you back!
>
> On 06/27/2011 01:53 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> I'm following the procedure at:
>>>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>>
>>> Does anyone know
58 matches
Mail list logo
