On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Why are people choosing it over other solutions, and what can we change
> in qemu/kvm to get users using that instead ?
>
>
I use Virtualbox on a laptop with Fedora 14 as host OS, I use for building
and test installation of Windows applicati
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:30:07PM -0700, Dan Young wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 18:37, Dave Jones wrote:
> >> I'm curious why virtualbox has gained so much inertia so quickly.
> >> Based solely on the number of kernel bug reports
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:37:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I'm curious why virtualbox has gained so much inertia so quickly.
> Based solely on the number of kernel bug reports we get that seem to be
> related to it, I have almost zero confidence in it being reliable.
>
> Why are people choosing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725
Matthias Haase changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
> > > and frequent on users syst
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:03:16AM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>- Local shared folders. to share files from Fedora host to windows
>client.
libvirt can do this now, and I think so can virt-manager (not
checked).
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsFilesystems
I'm not s
On 10/06/11 09:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:03:16AM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> - Running Windows application in a windows guest, runs very smooth, no
>> delay in updating the GUI.
>
> You should try new versions. I've never had a problem with d
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:37:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I'm curious why virtualbox has gained so much inertia so quickly.
> Based solely on the number of kernel bug reports we get that seem to be
> related to it, I have almost zero confidence in it being reliable.
>
> Why are people choosing
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Folks,
We are hosting a Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day today, at
14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is
to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
You can find a lot more detail here, along with all
Hi, a new cfistio package (3.280) as landed in rawhide. Packages
depending on cfitsio should be rebuilt.
Regards, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 10/06/11 09:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:03:16AM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>- Running Windows application in a windows guest, runs very smooth, no
> >>delay in updating the GUI
Outage: Server Updates/Reboots - 2011-06-14 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-06-14 21:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-06-14 21:00 UT
On 06/10/2011 02:28 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 01:26 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
>> Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts "#!/usr/bin/python".
>> Usually this leads to an implicit "Requires: /usr/bin/python", but for
>> some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, a
Compose started at Fri Jun 10 08:15:18 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On 06/09/2011 06:37 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Long list already from others but a couple of other things that are
nice (dont know if qemu has these today, but didn't used to)
(i) Variable size image for the VM
- it grows
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
> > > and frequent on users systems, particularly with advanced
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 08:50 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The other feature is USB passthrough. (KVM can do this, but IIRC it
> only works for USB 1.1 devices and it's not integrated into the UI).
Last time I tried I had to specify USB device and bus numbers. This is
quite unusable, as they
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:24 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> - it's memory deduplication reimplements what already in-kernel (for the
>sake of cross platform)
Kernel deduplication runs amok on my machine. When I have two guests,
one Windows, one Rawhide, running under kvm/qemu, kernel deduplicat
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nicola Soranzo:
> razertool package is dead upstream
razercfg [1] it the successor of razertool. If somebody packages it up,
it would be nice to have the package properly obsolete razertool.
Regards,
Christoph
[1] http://bues.ch/cms/hacking/razerc
commit 5b996572e5f94e81faea0fb17c4d679849caa698
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 10 14:35:15 2011 +0200
Perl 5.14 mass rebuild
perl-Newt.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Newt.spec b/perl-Newt.spec
index 8415f91..79eb48a 10064
commit 4d7d2773aaae65d4fc4b2c142824d9c87cc3dd75
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 10 14:35:42 2011 +0200
Perl 5.14 mass rebuild
perl-PBS.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PBS.spec b/perl-PBS.spec
index 0372c6d..a7abde8 100644
-
Hi Lennart,
systemd is eating a lot more memory than any other init process
I ever played with.
Granted, systemd does a bit more that "typical" init, but I think
using *eleven plus megabytes* of malloced space is a bit much.
systemctl --all shows 258 units total on my machine,
thus systemd uses
On 06/09/2011 07:44 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Also, for those that may not be aware, Virtualbox can be installed in
> just 2 commands in your Fedora system. Assuming you have wget installed.
...
> ~$ su
> wget
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.8/VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.x
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:30:46PM +0200, Thomas Sailer wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:24 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > - it's memory deduplication reimplements what already in-kernel (for the
> >sake of cross platform)
>
> Kernel deduplication runs amok on my machine. When I have two
On 06/10/2011 03:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> I understand your desire to replace everything by systemd.
> I really do. syslogd, klogd, mount, fsck, and a dozen other things
> I forget or don't know.
You're exaggerating.
> Why does systemd link against libpam?
> systemd does logins now, not /bi
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:08:26AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>(i) Variable size image for the VM
>- it grows to accommodate need
Interested to know why sparse images or qcow2 don't fulfil your needs.
These have been supported in KVM (and Xen) since forever.
> (ii) Easy to duplic
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:22:37AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> 2. Support decent graphics mode in guests. (After installing guest
> additions, a winxp guest on fedora host can run in any graphics
> resolution. I don't think qemu/kvm does this).
With SPICE, maximum resolution is 2560x1600.
Rich.
On 06/10/2011 09:36 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/10/2011 03:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
I understand your desire to replace everything by systemd.
I really do. syslogd, klogd, mount, fsck, and a dozen other things
I forget or don't know.
You're exaggerating.
Why does systemd link against
On 06/10/2011 09:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Hi Lennart,
systemd is eating a lot more memory than any other init process
I ever played with.
Granted, systemd does a bit more that "typical" init, but I think
using *eleven plus megabytes* of malloced space is a bit much.
systemctl --all shows 2
On 06/10/2011 03:59 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 09:36 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> systemd does not take the system down when it crashes. It catches the
>> signal, dumps core and freezes, but does not exit.
>> ^^^
> So you just end up with a "froze" system ins
>> Why are people choosing it over other solutions, and what can we change
>> in qemu/kvm to get users using that instead ?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
> 1. Easy setup of networking (bridged).
> 2. Support decent graphics mode in guests. (After installing guest
> additions, a
> winxp guest on fedora host can
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas:
> What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM.
The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at
least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKit.
We are still trying to get rid of GDM but we are mo
I'm happy to announce the results of our recent round of elections for
at-large seats on the Fedora Board and FESCo, and FAmSCo. The results
are as follows:
FESCo
There were five FESCo seats up for election this cycle. A total of
200 ballots were cast in the FESCo election. Each of the
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> They are available, but I think you have to build them yourself from
> source. All the information is here:
This is not an argument for libvirt/kvm/qemu/spice but against.
Here's some constructive advice:
1. Give the Red Hat virtualization tools one, unique name and
On 6/10/11 10:39 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> To add to the point about graphics support there is also the fact that
> GNOME3/Unity will only run with accelerated graphics which only
> VirtualBox supports.
I have Gnome 3 running with software GL. I'll probably be blogging
about it soon, it's not
On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> They are available, but I think you have to build them yourself from
>> source. All the information is here:
>
> 2. Make guest additions dead simple to install. Having to compile them
> with a Windows DDK is not dead
Tom Hughes on 06/10/2011 10:25 AM wrote:
> Actually building the driver (once I'd downloaded the 620Mb DDK) was
> quite easy. I'm still scratching my head over how to actually install it
> though ;-)
>
> That was only the graphics driver anyway - what I really want is the
> agent for the clipboard
On 10/06/11 16:54, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Tom Hughes on 06/10/2011 10:25 AM wrote:
>> Actually building the driver (once I'd downloaded the 620Mb DDK) was
>> quite easy. I'm still scratching my head over how to actually install it
>> though ;-)
>>
>> That was only the graphics driver anyway -
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 14:29 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There's a bug for these issues (no resolution though):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541230
My case was way more extreme, one core pretty much fully used by ksmd.
It was with late F14, just before the release of F15
On 06/10/2011 07:04 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas:
>> What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM.
>
> The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at
> least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKi
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:36 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > Why does systemd link against libpam?
> > systemd does logins now, not /bin/login or gdm or ...?
>
> to implement PAMName= (man systemd.exec)
I don't see any users of this feature on my F15.
I searched with Google and come up empty too.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:14:45PM +0200, 80 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reviewing osc and osc-source_validators (osc is Opensuse Build
> Service CLI, the latter a plugin to the former).
> An issue arose about helpers script location:
> 1) Fedora packaging guidelines suggests helpers *should go*
> /usr/l
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:11 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 03:59 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> > On 06/10/2011 09:36 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> >> systemd does not take the system down when it crashes. It catches the
> >> signal, dumps core and freezes, but does not exit.
> >>
On 06/10/2011 08:42 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:36 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>> Why does systemd link against libpam?
>>> systemd does logins now, not /bin/login or gdm or ...?
>>
>> to implement PAMName= (man systemd.exec)
>
> I don't see any users of this feature on m
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> It's the *fourth* largest process on my system!
>
>
> # ldd `which systemd`
1) Looking at what libraries a binary links to a is a terrible way to
optimize memory usage; try massif, say
2) It'd be a lot more productive to be positive and n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706472
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504157&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504159
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504157&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Frontend Web/Client Changes
---
* Buildroot Override Management
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
* Make update notes mandatory (fesco#457)
* Gracefully handle invalid update template values (#5
Hello all,
I've pushed the latest protobuf-2.4.1 to Rawhide, which bumps libprotobuf.so.6
to libprotobuf.so.7. This appears to affect the following "base" packages:
* libcompizconfig
* mozc
* mumble
* protobuf-c
The primary maintainers of the above have been BC
The labor of love that was maintaining xine-lib has passed, as it will no
longer be a dependency in f16's kde stack in any form. As such, I'm
orphaning it. Kevin Kofler has offered to take ownership, though I'd
venture he'd welcome any comaintainer assistance offered.
In a similar vein, phono
Neal Becker wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
>> > > and frequent on users systems
The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
of the traceback and file a bug?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
> boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
> probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
> of the traceb
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
> boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
> probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
> of the traceb
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:11 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> On 06/10/2011 03:59 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> > On 06/10/2011 09:36 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> >> systemd does not take the system down when it crashes. It catches the
>> >> signa
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
>> boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
>> probably just wait for updates
On 06/10/2011 02:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
> boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
> probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
> of the traceback and fil
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:12:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > They are available, but I think you have to build them yourself from
> > source. All the information is here:
>
> This is not an argument for libvirt/kvm/qemu/spice but against.
>
> Here's some c
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:13:39PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Just to followup, to setup bridged net on kvm I need to reboot my server.
> That's a non-starter.
I would be very surprised if rebooting was really needed. (But
conversely *not* very surprised if the instructions said you need to
re
On 06/11/2011 12:36 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> Would be nice to see the systemd author join this discussion?
I am sure you can get answers when someone is off vacation. However
what would be really nice is to redirect systemd discussions to its
upstream mailing list. Fedora devel is hardly the be
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:19:25PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
> boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
> probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
> of the
Le 10/06/2011 18:56, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
>
> I don't actually see this. Could you point me to the quote and section?
>
"/usr/libincludes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that
are not intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts."
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you want excellent desktop usability, then organize a group and
> make the work and patches happen.
I knew this would be the response, but I do not hold it against you.
If anyone wants to hire me and pay me to do this full-time job's worth
of work I'd be glad to. ;
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 21:23 +0200, Haïkel Guémar a écrit :
> I spent some time yesterday talking with opensuse guys on irc, since
> /usr/libexec has not been blessed by FHS, they won't move helpers from
> /usr/lib which is FHS-compliant location.
> I think that packaging guidelines should cl
On 6/10/11 9:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> At the very least, I would like to see its memory consumption
> to go down substantially.
Let's try to turn this into something constructive. I'll start with
David Malcolm's rather nifty, if unpolished, 'heap' plugin for gdb:
https://fedorahosted.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 15:09:02 -0400,
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> Couldn't tell you about lockups since if root is on anything with raid
> underlying, dracut drops to a shell. You are on the bz:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710646
>
> Hopefully, someone with apply the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:17:46 +0100,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Works very well for me, but:
>
> - Make sure you're running kernel-3.0-0.rc2.git0.2.fc16 with the
> ftrace bug fixed (thanks Kyle).
Done.
> - Make sure you upgrade module-init-tools *before* installing the 3.0
> kernel.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/11/2011 12:36 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> Would be nice to see the systemd author join this discussion?
>
> I am sure you can get answers when someone is off vacation. However
> what would be really nice is to redirect systemd discussi
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:06 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:17:46 +0100,
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > Works very well for me, but:
> >
> > - Make sure you're running kernel-3.0-0.rc2.git0.2.fc16 with the
> > ftrace bug fixed (thanks Kyle).
>
> Done.
>
> >
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I guess that your reference to moving to upstream indicates that
> systemd is now sufficiently established that discussion of problems is
> an upstream issue for bug triage/fixing? I would imagine that the user
> list may have useful exchange
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:23:54PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 10/06/2011 18:56, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> >
> > I don't actually see this. Could you point me to the quote and section?
> >
>
>
> "/usr/libincludes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that
> are not intended to be
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:59:18 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 02:28 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > On 06/02/2011 01:26 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> >> Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts
> >> "#!/usr/bin/python". Usually this leads to an implicit
> >> "Requires: /usr/bin/python", bu
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:55:14 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote:
> Domain KindDetailCount Allocated size
> - --- --- --
> uncategorized 2064 bytes5,370 11,083,680
Probably the SELinux file labelling da
On 06/10/2011 04:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 06/11/2011 12:36 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> Would be nice to see the systemd author join this discussion?
>>
>> I am sure you can get answers when someone is off vacation. However
>> what w
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 6/10/11 9:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > At the very least, I would like to see its memory consumption
> > to go down substantially.
>
> Let's try to turn this into something constructive. I'll start with
> David Malcolm's rather n
Quoting "Thomas Sailer" :
>
> Also, I have a strange card reader which I would love to use under some
> form of virtualisation, as the accompanying application only runs under
> very old versions of windows.
>
> The card reader has the misfeature that it requires firmware to be
> loaded by the PC.
Quoting "Przemek Klosowski" :
>
> Make it one command:
>
> yum install
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.8/VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.x86_64.rpm
>
> (or VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.i686.rpm for 32-bit systems)
>
OMG, I am such a dick for not even thinking of that
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Customers ask us to make the changes they want -- for server use and
> scalability -- and KVM is absolutely the best in that area as a
> result. See many recent benchmarks.
>
> Usability on single desktops is, well ... we do our best.
Hi,
I've noted a difference between f15 and f14 on the first one
mentioned, running the following it fails:
./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/
Sorry, I was typing on a netbook :P and the mail it was sent without subject
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 06/10/2011 03:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> what would be really nice is to redirect systemd discussions to its
> upstream mailing list. Fedora devel is hardly the best place for it.
>
> Rahul
Beg to differ - rather vehemently too - politely but vehemently.
systemd is only available
Rex Dieter wrote:
> The labor of love that was maintaining xine-lib has passed, as it will no
> longer be a dependency in f16's kde stack in any form. As such, I'm
> orphaning it. Kevin Kofler has offered to take ownership, though I'd
> venture he'd welcome any comaintainer assistance offered.
F
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Mem total:2035840 anon:431208 map:78924 free:419084
[snip]
> 1 15384 11856 13664 1340 11752 0 132 /sbin/init
So this singleton process is taking 0.76% of your RAM. What the heck are you
complaining about?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> | int
> | {
> |
> |;
> |return 0;
> | }
This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is
right to error on it.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It was for me until this morning. Virtual box killed it (beware of vb).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/11/2011 05:20 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Lets be blunt here - he pushed very very very hard on these very lists
> to get systemd in - now its in F15 and there are problems - so no
> punting please. Upstream and fedora are the same for syste
That is a gross over simplification. Fedora i
On 06/11/2011 05:35 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Why would many prospective contributors choose to work on KVM's
> desktop usability when VirtualBox's is already superior?
Because they like KVM and use it because of other advantages like
performance? Because they disagree with handing copyright
2011/6/10 Kevin Kofler :
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> | int
>> | {
>> |
>> |;
>> |return 0;
>> | }
>
> This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is
> right to error on it.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
> --
Thanks Kevin, but not so fast ;) !
it was my fault, I've copied
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
> configure:3659: gcc -no-install conftest.c >&5
> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
> Do you have any idea?
-no-install, which the command explicitly includes, is a libtool
option, b
2011/6/11 Miloslav Trmač :
> Hello,
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
>
>> configure:3659: gcc -no-install conftest.c >&5
>> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
>
>> Do you have any idea?
>
> -no-install, which the command ex
89 matches
Mail list logo
