On 05/28/2011 07:48 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> From abrt:
>
> Logging into Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com
> Checking for duplicates
> Bug is already reported: 701604
> Logging out
> Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
> https://bugzilla.redhat.
hello,
Recently, I've been getting a lot of "gnumed-server.noarch: E:
incorrect-fsf-address" errors from rpmlint. How is this to be handled?
Thanks,
Ankur
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sat May 28 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_gl.so.1.1()(64bit)
Ope
* Ankur Sinha [28/05/2011 11:51] :
>
> Recently, I've been getting a lot of "gnumed-server.noarch: E:
> incorrect-fsf-address" errors from rpmlint. How is this to be handled?
File a bug with upstream to update the copy of the license shipped with
their software.
The FSF's address is :
Free Softw
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 12:49 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> File a bug with upstream to update the copy of the license shipped
> with
> their software.
>
> The FSF's address is :
> Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>
> Emmanuel
For the
Hi folks,
I was packaging openEMR. This is what the INSTALL file says:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-medical/ticket/4
> Copy the OpenEMR folder into the root folder of the webserver. On Mandrake
> Linux, for example, use the command:
>
> bash# mv openemr /var/www/html/
>
> Make sure the w
Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 16:44 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was packaging openEMR. This is what the INSTALL file says:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-medical/ticket/4
>
>
> > Copy the OpenEMR folder into the root folder of the webserver. On Mandrake
> > Linux, for exampl
On 05/28/2011 11:23 AM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 16:44 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
[SNIP]
>
> Maybe have a look as w3c-markup-validator or phpMyAdmin as examples for
> web based software. As far as I can see, the idea is, to put software
> where it belongs to (%{_datadir}) a
* Ankur Sinha [28/05/2011 13:41] :
>
> For the time being, for the review request, do we need to ask the
> submitter to patch the address to correct it?
I view patching licenses as being a bad thing. I ask the submitter to
file a bug upstream but do not block the review on this matter.
Emmanuel
On 27/05/11 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Huh? The release criteria say a "fully updated default installation".
>
> yeah, that's what I meant. install F(N-1) with all default options,
> update, then run the upgrade.
>
> the key is that we don't test any kind of real-world configuration, with
On 05/28/2011 02:47 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ankur Sinha [28/05/2011 13:41] :
>>
>> For the time being, for the review request, do we need to ask the
>> submitter to patch the address to correct it?
>
> I view patching licenses as being a bad thing. I ask the submitter to
> file a bug upstre
Hi,
I've installed F15 preserving home partition, and gtk apps look ugly.
I've made a workaround moving .gconf and it fixed partially. (I'm
using KDE SC)
I've found some comments about it at (with a proposed workaround too):
http://www.kirsle.net/blog/kirsle/gnome-s-impact-on-everything
Can be
On 5/27/11 5:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > There was also possibly some terrifyingly bad interaction with running
>> > multiple transactions for split media, but thankfully we've shed that
>> > beast of burden.
> So, can we have updates included for upgrades then? (IMHO, this should be
> the d
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The use of Nauty in Polymake is quite localized. AFAICT, you only have to
> touch the following locations:
Thanks, Kevin. This is useful information.
> You should also unbundle cdd and lrs (i.e. use separate packages for those)
> and check
Adam Williamson wrote:
> the key is that we don't test any kind of real-world configuration, with
> anything other than default apps, actual user data in place and so on.
And it shows. :-( My user account has been through many upgrades, and I've
grown accustomed to having various problems that do
Hi List,
My name is Andrew Nixon from Birmingham UK. I am looking to get involved in
helping to package for Fedora. I have a particular interest in scientific
applications / packages. I work in a small computer science group in a local
hospital, where we do not specialize therefore I have experien
You shoud contact ambassador from UK so you get the proper information on how
to contribute to the project.
Jeroen van Meeuwen from Pontypridd, Wales
Luis Enrique Bazán De León
Analista de Sistemas
Baker Tilly Panamá
An independent member firm of
Baker Tilly International
Calle Miguel Brostella
Here is this week's change to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
---
The systemd guidelines on naming unit files have been amended to tell
packagers how to make compatibility symlinks for alternate service names
should their service have had a different name in the past.
http://fedoraproject.org/w
Hi,
The release notes section in the feature pages are supposed to help with
writing the release notes and release announcement. However this is not
being taken seriously and feature owners just write something very brief
and useless most of the time.To highlight the problem, refer to
some o
Jerry James wrote:
> The GPLv2 vs. GPLv3 issue looks to be a deal breaker, though. Drat.
> I wonder if I can talk the bliss authors into releasing a GPLv2+ or
> LGPLv2+ version. It's worth a try. So far I haven't been able to get
> a response out of the nauty developer, so little chance of a lic
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> File a bug with upstream to update the copy of the license shipped with
> their software.
>
> The FSF's address is :
> Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
Unfortunately, it's not just the license, it's also the lice
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> I've installed F15 preserving home partition, and gtk apps look ugly.
> I've made a workaround moving .gconf and it fixed partially. (I'm
> using KDE SC)
>
> I've found some comments about it at (with a proposed workaround too):
>
> http://www.kirsle.net/blog/kirsle/gnome-s
I don't own a device to test this any more, so I'm going to orphan
these two. If anyone wants them, they're very low maintainence.
(mostly just keeping up with package guideline changes, though there's
a newer version of fxload available, but the absense of hardware made me
nervous to blindly rebas
23 matches
Mail list logo