Is the pino upstream active right now? Pino's default branch is broken.
I took FC15's SRPM as base and started patching it to bring pino into proper
shape. It builds with current FC15's builddeps already (patches in Fedora's
bug tracker) and maximizes properly. I want to build autorefreshing into
On 11/05/11 20:53, Dan Horák wrote:
> Matthew Booth píše v St 11. 05. 2011 v 20:33 +0100:
>> Can anybody explain to me why this build failed in rawhide:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3066735
>>
>> There was no previous rubygem-virt-p2v-doc rpm, so I don't understand
>> th
Thx. for your prompt replies.
> Did you actually use this driver in the past?
Yes. I can positivly confirm this driver has worked in the past. It
could be used with the mouse or touchpad in parallel. The working is
such that when you put the "cursor" or "puck" on the tablet, the pointer
jumps to
Compose started at Thu May 12 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.2.14-5.fc15
On 05/12/2011 01:10 PM, Dmitri Bachtin wrote:
> Is the pino upstream active right now? Pino's default branch is broken.
>
> I took FC15's SRPM as base and started patching it to bring pino into
> proper shape. It builds with current FC15's builddeps already (patches
> in Fedora's bug tracker) and m
Thank you for information, I will follow your advice.
Cheers
-- Dmitri Bachtin
2011/5/12 Rahul Sundaram
> On 05/12/2011 01:10 PM, Dmitri Bachtin wrote:
> > Is the pino upstream active right now? Pino's default branch is broken.
> >
> > I took FC15's SRPM as base and started patching it to brin
Hi list,
I'm orphaning gbirthday and linbox, because I either don't use them
anymore or it's too much work to integrate it into fedora...
* gbirthday:
I don't use it anymore, and it has some SQL bugs open (I
don't use SQL either, so I can't debug it etc.)
* li
Hi,
I'm working with nut upstream to test sysv->systemd changes, but I found some
problems and they've came up with a few questions too.
1) does systemd support alternative to "service sthd configtest" or other
special actions?
2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: missing the Joystick.pm module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704221
Summary: missing the Joystick.pm module
Product: Fedora
Hi,
2011/5/12 Michal Hlavinka :
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with nut upstream to test sysv->systemd changes, but I found some
> problems and they've came up with a few questions too.
>
>
> 1) does systemd support alternative to "service sthd configtest" or other
> special actions?
>
>
> 2) does systemd
Sounds interesting:
http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 03/19/2011 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
> > Upstream maintainers believe 5.x is ready for distributions,
> > see thread:
> > http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2011-February/004526.html
> >
> > 5.0.1 was released ONE year ago
On 2011-05-11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> * #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags
> (nirik, 17:35:15)
> * AGREED: will enable them both by default in rawhide and see if we
> run into issues. (nirik, 17:39:26)
>
Hm, right now I found a problem caused by enabling PIE
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 14:26 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-05-11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > * #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags
> > (nirik, 17:35:15)
> > * AGREED: will enable them both by default in rawhide and see if we
> > run into issues. (nirik, 17:
On 05/12/2011 12:20 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> I'm seeing the following after trying to update an fc14.x86_64 platform
> (updated) to Lovelock (F15B) with preupgrade:
>
>Booting 'Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock)'
>
> kernel /upgrade/vmlinuz preupgrade repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade
On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:28:54 +0200 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> 1) does systemd support alternative to "service sthd configtest" or
> other special actions?
No.
> 2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It seem
> it's not supported right now. Is there any plan for this?
Can you
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sounds interesting:
>
> http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm.
So I don
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Sounds interesting:
> >
> > http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
>
> It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> it'll be l
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:29 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Sounds interesting:
> > >
> > > http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
> >
> > It's less functiona
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> > it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm.
> > So I don't see any
Dne 12.5.2011 18:05, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
>> Which functions is it missing?
>
> Accessibility, for one.
And who cares about that ... :(
(My wife has MS and writing on keyboard is getting to be
difficult, so I am really disgusted with the level of ignoring a11y in
most current project ... Gn
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sounds interesting:
>
> http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
Public discussion background see this thread:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00226.html
Specifically:
http://mail.gnome.org/arch
So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> > > it'll be larger than gdm becaus
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 12:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:29 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > > Sounds interesting:
> > > >
> > > > http://digitizo
On 05/12/2011 03:12 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:28:54 +0200 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> > 1) does systemd support alternative to "service sthd configtest" or
>> > other special actions?
> No.
>
You can run ExecStartPre= before starting a service for syntax checking
before
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:01:24PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Which functions is it missing?
> >
> > Approximately anything that's been implemented in gdm since 2003.
> >
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
> have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
I don't think the available information supports any such conclusions
concerning motivation. If you want to
On 05/12/2011 09:01 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 12:20 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>> I'm seeing the following after trying to update an fc14.x86_64 platform
>> (updated) to Lovelock (F15B) with preupgrade:
>>
>>Booting 'Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock)'
>>
>> kernel /upg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678756
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:38:46AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> That's... unpleasant. And I'm not entirely sure it's intentional, I
> wouldn't expect -fPIE to imply -rdynamic. But my understanding of the
> problem may be naïve. I'll dig on this, thanks for bringing it up.
>
> (Obviously I'll be
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> I don't think the available information supports any such conclusions
> concerning motivation. If you want to know the motivations for the
> decision hop the fence and go have a polite friendly chat about it
> with the people who made the dec
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 01:10 PM, Dmitri Bachtin wrote:
> > Is the pino upstream active right now? Pino's default branch is broken.
> >
> > I took FC15's SRPM as base and started patching it to bring pino into
> > proper shape. It builds with current
commit ab858877fdf5221537ce305bd09fa72e38103916
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Thu May 12 22:44:49 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RequireSSL.spec | 54 +++
sources
When you open a page with Armenian characters such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_language the font server (or
perhaps xulrunner) digs around to find a font that has that codepoint.
Often it's just one font in your system that can provide it (so if you
ask for it to be styled in serif, sa
On 12 May 2011 12:41, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
> have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
I'm pretty sure Ubuntu chose it because it's not gdm.
Differentiation FTW.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Compose started at Thu May 12 13:15:18 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproje
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:14:43AM +0200, Dan wrote:
> Thx. for your prompt replies.
> > Did you actually use this driver in the past?
> Yes. I can positivly confirm this driver has worked in the past. It
> could be used with the mouse or touchpad in parallel. The working is
> such that when you
On 05/12/2011 11:49 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 09:01 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 12:20 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>> I'm seeing the following after trying to update an fc14.x86_64 platform
>>> (updated) to Lovelock (F15B) with preupgrade:
>>>
>>>
On 13/05/11 05:24, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>
> I'm not seeing any interest in resolving this, so I'm going to go ahead with
> a yum update instead.
>
> Too bad, the problem was 100% reproducible, so it might have been a good
> source of information into this problem.
>
> -Philip
>
Did you
41 matches
Mail list logo
