Compose started at Wed May 11 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.2.14-5.fc15
On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:00:30 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:54:44PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > The breakage is fine, one expects that. A fundamental breakage
> > that the relevant developers don't even notice for weeks is another
> > question; as I said, that sug
Hello,
I do a lot of work on making sure Linux meets various security standards. One
of the
better known security profiles is the DISA STIG. (STIG means Security Technical
Information Guide.) Back in February, there was a big update to it. I have
reviewed it
and sent feedback to get some item
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663931
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
--- Comment #9 from Wes Hardaker 2011-05-11 09:58:54
EDT ---
Rawhide doesn't get "updates", just "builds" last I checked (but m
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:23:08 -0600, JC wrote:
> > In the week before F15 change freeze, are you really surprised that
> > nobody's running the F16 dumping ground?
>
> I'm not talking about this week. The X11 problem was reported three weeks
> ago, and the "don't run Rawhide" advice given to me
On Tue, 10 May 2011 19:30:34 -0400, TL wrote:
> Leaving rawhide busted is a discourtesy to your fellow developers.
> Don't do it. If you've got code that doesn't work yet, play with it
> in your own repo, but don't push it out where the rest of us have to
> deal with it.
That conclusion is based
On 11/05/11 15:17, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Do you have any numbers? I don't believe that "a lot of people" run
> Rawhide after it has been branched for the next release of Fedora.
I just run Rawhide as virtual installs these days,
2 for pure rawhide. 2 for branched.
Not enough boxes to spare t
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Plack:
0501c22d0f9cfd496c050dfcbe7a03d3 Plack-0.9978.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
commit 3aaa5eac93de083a71413d314d26b8bdda8e284c
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Wed May 11 16:51:59 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Plack.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.g
Le Mar 10 mai 2011 18:04, Adam Jackson a écrit :
>
> On 5/10/11 11:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
>> Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
>> occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
>> trying hard enough. But if it can remain this fun
Le Lun 9 mai 2011 17:26, Tom Lane a écrit :
>
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>> Ok, I know what is happening. I looked at the init script and I
>> realized that it doesn't have any LSB header info about boot process
>> order.
>
> No, it's assuming that the chkconfig numbering takes care of that.
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
--- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell 2011-05-11 11:38:54 EDT ---
Okay, the update for this package needs to be built for rawhide too
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Event:
78830ea72145c0194fb5427859166152 Event-1.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:23:00PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> That conclusion is based on the assumption that somebody pushes completely
> broken stuff into Rawhide _knowingly_.
Or that they push unproven code into rawhide carelessly.
--CJD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
commit b3eec5350516a781dda17cb175730ffce7b2df6c
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed May 11 17:41:37 2011 +0200
update to 1.15
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Event.spec | 23 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
Casey Dahlin writes:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:23:00PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> That conclusion is based on the assumption that somebody pushes completely
>> broken stuff into Rawhide _knowingly_.
> Or that they push unproven code into rawhide carelessly.
Or that they push code and t
Hello guys,
I am Anuj. Have been a part of Fedora Project since a year, but hadn't been
able to successfully compile an RPM until yesterday.
My first RPM is already awaiting review on Bugzilla (Bug #703721) **along
with "*B*locks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR".
I hope I will learn a lot from the developers fro
See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-1.fc15,nss-softokn-3.12.10-1.fc15,nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc15,nspr-4.8.8-1.fc15
For the lists of upstream bug fixes see:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&resolution=FIXED&classification=Components&query_format=advanced&
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
--- Comment #11 from Wes Hardaker 2011-05-11 14:12:36
EDT ---
Ok, I thought I had built it for rawhide but you're right, I hadn
commit e841c347f842a7f76ebfe62fde47e3fd8a177517
Author: Wes Hardaker
Date: Wed May 11 11:24:14 2011 -0700
updated to 1.800.2, the latest and greatest
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-05-11)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-05-11/fesco.2011-05-11-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509:
2859915bf11cbf98155150d37ab5dbdd Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.800.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
commit 1e6842f0a05778def0a5af3b63e4f30a48e25548
Author: Wes Hardaker
Date: Wed May 11 11:28:49 2011 -0700
new sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 13b41e1..df29d47 100644
--- a/.g
Ahoy,
is there a way I can contribute to bring the X11 SummaSketch driver
package back to life?
It is not on the list of depreciated packages,
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Deprecated_packages
but the package was de facto given up after F10,
* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproje
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
ac0b7d382b025bb529b047823830b111 Mojolicious-1.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Can anybody explain to me why this build failed in rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3066735
There was no previous rubygem-virt-p2v-doc rpm, so I don't understand
this output.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team
GPG ID
commit 579cba575db359218abdb78efa3d7dfe61bf05b6
Author: Yanko Kaneti
Date: Wed May 11 22:33:43 2011 +0300
Upstream update 1.32
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --g
On 05/11/2011 03:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1
> (RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> download links and testing instructions.
>
> Installation:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Result
Matthew Booth píše v St 11. 05. 2011 v 20:33 +0100:
> Can anybody explain to me why this build failed in rawhide:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3066735
>
> There was no previous rubygem-virt-p2v-doc rpm, so I don't understand
> this output.
The noarch subpackages creat
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:30:07PM +0200, Dan wrote:
> but the package was de facto given up after F10,
> * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=859
> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/xorg-x11-drv-summa
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-input-summa/
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 21:30 +0200, Dan wrote:
> Ahoy,
>
> is there a way I can contribute to bring the X11 SummaSketch driver
> package back to life?
Start by getting it to build against a recent X server. It's been
formally unmaintained upstream since February 2009:
http://cgit.freedesktop.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703990
There is a ds patch and an admin server patch.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 05/11/2011 03:41 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> x86_64 dvd iso is missing.
Sorry about that. The images were on alt.fp.o, but I didn't wait until
the x86_64 images were finished rsync'ing to serverbeach1 (the server
used in the download links) before posting the announcement. All images
are on s
Just running through the checklist... Letting folks know I will likely
be updating fedora packages for condor in the future.
Cheers,
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/19/2011 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Upstream maintainers believe 5.x is ready for distributions,
> see thread:
> http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2011-February/004526.html
>
> 5.0.1 was released ONE year ago, and no critical bugs were discovered.
>
> please resubmit t
On Wed, 11.05.11 17:19, Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mail...@laposte.net) wrote:
>
>
> Le Lun 9 mai 2011 17:26, Tom Lane a écrit :
> >
> > Michał Piotrowski writes:
> >> Ok, I know what is happening. I looked at the init script and I
> >> realized that it doesn't have any LSB header info about boot
Compose started at Wed May 11 13:15:17 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:06:05PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 21:30 +0200, Dan wrote:
> > Ahoy,
> >
> > is there a way I can contribute to bring the X11 SummaSketch driver
> > package back to life?
>
> Start by getting it to build against a recent X server. It's been
> f
I'm seeing the following after trying to update an fc14.x86_64 platform
(updated) to Lovelock (F15B) with preupgrade:
Booting 'Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock)'
kernel /upgrade/vmlinuz preupgrade repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade
ks=hd:UUID=da026107-5d0c-4c77-9fa4-502576c05cdd:/upgrade/ks.cfg
41 matches
Mail list logo
