Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

> > * Updates to popular languages. Python 3.2, Rails 3.0.3, and > > OCaml 3.12 are all included in Fedora 15. > > If we are going to mention OCaml then to be fair > can we please also mention GHC 7.0.2, > which is major new version upgrade since F14? Ok that is probably me failing to follow the

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > 2 karma points *including* a proventester. That is: > > > > 1 proventester + 1 non-pt > > > > OR > > > > 2 proventester > > > > are sufficient. And yes, that is the current policy. > > Uh, that's the current po

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The various update streams flow differently. For a normal day, > EPEL4/5/6 might have about 2-20 updates. It might be practical to look > at all these for a quick glance. f14 (updates and testing) has around > 30-50ish. f13 has around 5-20, an

[Bug 680391] perl-Bio-Graphics-2.14 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680391 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added --

rawhide report: 20110421 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 21 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8

shouldn't download directory for install images be called "Install" instead of "Fedora"?

Filed https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4654 . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 03:42:02AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: > > > * Updates to popular languages. Python 3.2, Rails 3.0.3, and > > > OCaml 3.12 are all included in Fedora 15. > > > > If we are going to mention OCaml then to be fair > > can we please also mention GHC 7.0.2, > > which is major ne

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:42:04 +0300, AT wrote: > I think when it becomes normal to circumvent the system then perhaps we > need to rethink it and implement it in a sane way? I wouldn't say "it becomes normal", but certainly there's a tendency towards wanting updates be pushed into the stable repo

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/19/2011 04:50 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > The clock is ticking. The days are counting down. The release of > Fedora 15, codenamed "Lovelock," is scheduled for release in late > May. Fedora is the leading edge, free and open source operating > system that continues to deliver innovative featur

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps > and this silly Win95-ish "Oh no!,..." screens of death? > > All three happened to me, when trying this Beta, yesterday ;) Filing bug reports is helpful and what one is suppos

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 11:04 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: >> Coders have lots of new development tools to try out, including: >> * Updates to popular languages. Python 3.2, Rails 3.0.3, and >> OCaml 3.12 are all included in Fedora 15. > If we are going to mention OCaml then to be fair > can we please also menti

[perl-Module-Signature] Pseudo-merge EPEL-5/EPEL-6/Fedora versions

commit 679a47b62edce83e2a1778a450d051b78f232425 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Thu Apr 21 14:00:06 2011 +0100 Pseudo-merge EPEL-5/EPEL-6/Fedora versions perl-Module-Signature.spec | 55 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) --- diff

[perl-Module-Signature] Tweaks for changelog consistency

commit 5ef53e3b71cde134c3f6f03014d5fd8435b55dd9 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Thu Apr 21 14:02:31 2011 +0100 Tweaks for changelog consistency perl-Module-Signature.spec | 72 ++-- 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/pe

[perl-Module-Signature/f15/master] (4 commits) ...Tweaks for changelog consistency

Summary of changes: 36a228e... Update to 0.67. (*) b7202fa... Appease rpmbuild >= 4.9. (*) 679a47b... Pseudo-merge EPEL-5/EPEL-6/Fedora versions (*) 5ef53e3... Tweaks for changelog consistency (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Pe

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 03:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps >> and this silly Win95-ish "Oh no!,..." screens of death? >> >> All three happened to me, when trying this Beta, yesterday ;)

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] Bump version 51

commit f365c50e7f39e4796f023f68a2bad656a4dcc2a1 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Apr 21 12:16:09 2011 +0200 Bump version 51 .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec | 11 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(

[perl-Module-Signature/f14/master] (8 commits) ...Tweaks for changelog consistency

Summary of changes: db92678... - Update to 0.65 (#630714). (*) 890c60a... - Update to 0.66 (#630714). (*) 898c21f... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) d4898f4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) 36a228e... Update to 0.67. (*) b72

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 07:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > Branched report with number of missing requires goes on fedora-devel and > to maintainers of those packages, so they must be aware of it. The list > is shorter than it was before beta but there's still lot of packages. Do > we want to release it as

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] Correct changelog date

commit 1c58fc1d778d4be5c9f804392a3498d152546f7f Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Apr 21 15:55:03 2011 +0200 Correct changelog date perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec in

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] - Update to 0.65 (#630714).

commit dd018ec9a3774356b4ad579109351c30f7ef7c22 Author: Ville Skyttä Date: Tue Sep 7 00:21:26 2010 +0300 - Update to 0.65 (#630714). .gitignore |2 +- perl-Module-Signature.spec | 20 ++-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 20 inse

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] - Update to 0.66 (#630714).

commit 5176a1df7719a0fee94ca275ec6cc6852f065cc8 Author: Ville Skyttä Date: Tue Sep 7 09:27:58 2010 +0300 - Update to 0.66 (#630714). .gitignore |2 +- perl-Module-Signature.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 del

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] Update to 0.67.

commit ada001af656c70913295cbcff020546c1b134024 Author: Ville Skyttä Date: Tue Apr 19 20:26:01 2011 +0300 Update to 0.67. .gitignore |2 +- perl-Module-Signature.spec |6 +- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] Appease rpmbuild >= 4.9.

commit 096ad9f3b133436f6ffa01236a1b8d520236cec7 Author: Ville Skyttä Date: Tue Apr 19 21:56:41 2011 +0300 Appease rpmbuild >= 4.9. perl-Module-Signature.spec |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Module-Signature.spec b/perl-Module-Signatu

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] Pseudo-merge EPEL-5/EPEL-6/Fedora versions

commit 3c9bb9daeb74d64e0c8cde7788acc09e356c1d3a Author: Paul Howarth Date: Thu Apr 21 14:00:06 2011 +0100 Pseudo-merge EPEL-5/EPEL-6/Fedora versions perl-Module-Signature.spec | 54 --- 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) --- diff -

[perl-Module-Signature/f13/master] Tweaks for changelog consistency

commit 90b4c25f82c52041eb7537379356e25722f2cc77 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Thu Apr 21 14:02:31 2011 +0100 Tweaks for changelog consistency perl-Module-Signature.spec | 72 ++-- 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/pe

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:51:16 +0300 Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The various update streams flow differently. For a normal day, > > EPEL4/5/6 might have about 2-20 updates. It might be practical to > > look at all these for a quick glance. f14 (upda

xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

Hi, Just done quite a big update to my rawhide box, performed a reboot and have been left without an x server. I thought it was the xserver, so downgraded to 1.10.99.1-2.20110418.fc16, but still the same problem. I'm getting a segfault at adress 0xb2b4c using the neuveau driver Help! I'm reduced

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

I had the same problem. I'm using the intel driver. Backed out xorg to a previous version. darrell On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:40, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > Just done quite a big update to my rawhide box, performed a reboot and have > been left without an x server. I thought it was the xserv

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

Hi, On 21 April 2011 16:45, darrell pfeifer wrote: > I had the same problem. I'm using the intel driver. > > Backed out xorg to a previous version. > > I did that too, but no go :( TTFN Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

Paul Johnson wrote: > I did that too, but no go :( Have you tried booting into an older kernel along with the older X? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

I'm running 1.10.0-5.fc16 (There were two 1.10.99 newer versions) darrell On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:48, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > On 21 April 2011 16:45, darrell pfeifer wrote: > >> I had the same problem. I'm using the intel driver. >> >> Backed out xorg to a previous version. >> >> I did

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/21/2011 11:50 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote: > I'm running 1.10.0-5.fc16 (There were two 1.10.99 newer versions) > > darrell > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:48, Paul Johnson > wrote: > > Hi, > > On 21 A

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

On 04/21/2011 11:40 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > Just done quite a big update to my rawhide box, performed a reboot and have > been left without an x server. I thought it was the xserver, so downgraded > to 1.10.99.1-2.20110418.fc16, but still the same problem. > > I'm getting a segfault at ad

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

Axel Thimm wrote: > Unfortunately security updates are explicitly listed as to be handled > like critical path packages, so Adam is correct in the current context, > at least if the wiki page is not incorrect. I think you're misunderstanding the wiki page. The "including security updates" phrase

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:40 +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > Just done quite a big update to my rawhide box, performed a reboot and > have been left without an x server. I thought it was the xserver, so > downgraded to 1.10.99.1-2.20110418.fc16, but still the same problem. Rawhide's X is goin

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > Unfortunately security updates are explicitly listed as to be handled > > like critical path packages, so Adam is correct in the current context, > > at least if the wiki page is not incorrect. > > I think you're misund

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Uh, that's the current policy for critical path packages, not for non- > critical packages which require only the autokarma set by the maintainer > (which can be as low as 1) to be reached. No, they always just require +1 from anyone (or a

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:17 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > And with all the testing requirements, major breakage slips through > nevertheless, because we're missing testing instructions for nearly all > updates. To reiterate this again (thanks, Babe!) we've never claimed the process would catch

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

Adam Williamson wrote: > No, they always just require +1 from anyone (or an X day wait). This > happens to be equivalent to the lowest possible autokarma setting, but > that's just a coincidence, it doesn't *mean* anything. If you set > autokarma higher, you can still push manually once you have +1

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:50:15 -0700, AW wrote: > To reiterate this again (thanks, Babe!) we've never claimed the process > would catch all breakage, or expected it to. The point is to catch as > much as we can, In my point of view, "as much as we can" is not what is being done so far at Fedora.

2011-04-21 - F-15 blocker bug review #2 - recap

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f1

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 21:11 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > No, they always just require +1 from anyone (or an X day wait). This > > happens to be equivalent to the lowest possible autokarma setting, but > > that's just a coincidence, it doesn't *mean* anything. If you set >

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:51 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 04/21/2011 03:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >> I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps > >> and this silly Win95-ish "Oh no!,..." screens of death

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/19/2011 04:50 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > The clock is ticking. The days are counting down. The release of > > Fedora 15, codenamed "Lovelock," is scheduled for release in late > > May. Fedora is the leading edge, free and open sour

non-responsive icon theme maintainer

Hello, I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read the mails from bugzilla. I don't feel the need to take over the package but if no one else wants to do it. I am ok with caring for it. https://bugz

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On 04/21/2011 12:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> No, they always just require +1 from anyone (or an X day wait). This >> happens to be equivalent to the lowest possible autokarma setting, but >> that's just a coincidence, it doesn't *mean* anything. If you set >> autokarma hi

unable to renew my certificate

Hi, I can't renew my certificate : fedora.client.ServerError: ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/dogencert, 503, Service Unavailable) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review Request!

Hi all, I have 3 review requests waiting for someone to take over for about 2 months. Unfortunately, currently I cannot offer review swaps, but I hope some of you will take them :P These are the review requests: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems URL: https://b

Re: unable to renew my certificate

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:51:16 +0200 philippe makowski wrote: > Hi, > > I can't renew my certificate : > > fedora.client.ServerError: > ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/dogencert, > 503, Service Unavailable) There is an outage going on right now moving the fas01 machine

File Bucardo-4.4.3.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: bd15d99de987ccb0b9fa5050e208e061 Bucardo-4.4.3.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

Christopher Aillon wrote: > No. Case in point, I just pushed > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-5635 which has > autokarma of 3, and only 1 karma point. Oh, great that this has been fixed! It must have been fixed fairly recently. Last time I tried, it didn't work. That was one

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

Here's what's currently working for me in Rawhide (AMD 5400+, onboard nvidia 9100): xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-24.20110324git8378443.fc16.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.10.0-5.fc16.x86_64 kernel-2.6.39-0.rc3.git2.0.fc16.x86_64 (manually deleted microcode.ko) -- RockDoctor -- devel mailing li

F-15 Branched report: 20110421 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 21 13:15:52 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 03:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps >> and this silly Win95-ish "Oh no!,..." screens of death? >> >> All three happened to me, when trying this Beta, yesterday ;) >

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 Beta!!

On 04/21/2011 09:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:51 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> On 04/21/2011 03:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps and t