Hi,
I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
After turning system on I noticed that repo is totally broken. Should
barriers=1 protect from such a situation?
(Fortunately I made a backup yesterday, so I just lost a couple of minutes :))
--
Best regards,
Michal
http:
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Firefox releases, going forward
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chris Smart
wrote:
> Given that Mozilla is dramatically changing the development of Firefox
> and making releases much more frequent - i.e. Firefox 5 du
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> After turning system on I noticed that repo is totally broken.
How do you define "totally broken"?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
-
2011/4/14 Andreas Schwab :
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> After turning system on I noticed that repo is totally broken.
>
> How do you define "totally broken"?
All files in repo looks like added to commit, but not commited.
#
# Initial commit
#
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git rm --ca
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> Also git log says
> fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD'
Looks like the only issue is that .git/refs/heads/master has been lost.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for someth
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 10:29 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
napisał:
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> Also git log says
>> fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD'
>
> Looks like the only issue is that .git/refs/heads/master has been lost.
Indeed, the file is empty.
But I don't have this file in the repo
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> But I don't have this file in the repo that I restored from the backup.
You do, in .git/packed-refs.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 10:42 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
napisał:
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> But I don't have this file in the repo that I restored from the backup.
>
> You do, in .git/packed-refs.
You're right.
But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
such data l
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
> such data loss/breakage? Or I just had a big bad luck?
It could also be a bug in git, perhaps it needs to take more care to
create the ref file atomically.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redha
Hi,
I have similar question (sorry for stealing this thread). I have package
that has 3 services (they somehow depend on each other). Based on
configuration in /etc/sysconfig/.. file it starts 2 or 3 services. This is
handled by init script, but I don't know how to do it in systemd service
file.
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
napisał:
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
>> such data loss/breakage? Or I just had a big bad luck?
>
> It could also be a bug in git, perhaps it needs to take more care to
>
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
> napisał:
>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>
>>> But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
>>> such data loss/breakage? Or I just had a big bad luck?
>>
>> It could also be a bug in git, p
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:19 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
napisał:
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
>> napisał:
>>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>>
But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
such data loss/bre
> Is there a good solution for this?
Which service ( file ) is this.
I can take a look at to see which way is best to approach it.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:54:59 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> > Is there a good solution for this?
>
> Which service ( file ) is this.
>
> I can take a look at to see which way is best to approach it.
It's package nut : /etc/init.d/ups, there are 3 services: driver, upsd and
upsmon.
Al
As I have neither hardware to test nor time to give the package the
needed love (i.e. init scripts) I've given up ownership of the
irda-utils package. It's a package with 5 open bugs, two of them man
page fixes, the other three initscript stuff that needs some work/testing.
Karsten
--
On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> d) split it to more service files and make dependency there
>
> this would be incompatible change in configuration and hard to do,
Hard maybe, but solvable. Incompatibility happens from time to time.
That's what release notes are for.
I can imagine
On 04/14/2011 05:19 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
>> napisał:
>>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>>
But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against
such data loss/breakage? Or I just ha
This is just a reminder that today, April 14 is Fedora Virtualization
test day. Test plans and more information for the event can be found on
the Fedora Project Wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-04-14_Virtualization
IRC for the event on freenode in #fedora-test-day. Please com
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 14:00, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> This is just a reminder that today, April 14 is Fedora Virtualization
> test day. Test plans and more information for the event can be found on
> the Fedora Project Wiki at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-04-14_Virtualization
On 04/14/2011 09:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> Is there a good solution for this?
The right solution is to split this into three service files as I have
done in bug 696611
then simply run
systemctl start/stop/restart/reload/enable upsd-master.service # for master
( which start the upsd-mas
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > d) split it to more service files and make dependency there
> >
> > this would be incompatible change in configuration and hard to do,
>
> Hard maybe, but solvable. Incompatibility happe
On Thu, 14.04.11 11:14, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have similar question (sorry for stealing this thread). I have package
> that has 3 services (they somehow depend on each other). Based on
> configuration in /etc/sysconfig/.. file it starts 2 or 3 services. Thi
On Thu, 14.04.11 12:55, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:54:59 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a good solution for this?
> >
> > Which service ( file ) is this.
> >
> > I can take a look at to see which way is best to approach it.
On 4/14/11 4:27 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:19 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
> napisał:
>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>
>>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
>>> napisał:
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> But the question remains - should
On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > > d) split it to more service files and make dependency there
> > >
> > > this would be incompatible change in
On 11/04/11 22:28, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:00:07 +0200, Marcela wrote:
>
>>> mod_perl-devel erroneously provides perl(warnings), which means that
>>> anything containing a perl script with "use warnings;" in it is liable
>>> to pull it in. Should be easily fixable - I'll ge
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
napisał:
> On 4/14/11 4:27 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:19 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
>> napisał:
>>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>>
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab
napisał:
>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:28:28 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.04.11 12:55, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:54:59 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a good solution for this?
> > >
> > > Which service ( file ) i
On Thu, 14.04.11 09:51, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Systemd needs to offer a way to handle these situation until most
> distributions decide to adopt systemd. Because upstream has to deal
> primarily with sysvinit, and many will not care about systemd until it
> is widespread.
The way
On 4/14/11 8:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
> napisał:
...
>> What kind of SSD is it?
>
> OCZ Vertex 2 with firmware 1.25 (this is not the latest version, but I
> did not have too much courage to update it :))
Ok. We (the ext4 list) h
> When you do an update for F-15, please add the following builds to it,
> which remove the bogus perl(UNIVERSAL) provides:
>
> perl-UNIVERSAL-exports-0.05-11.fc15
> perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker-0.08-14.fc15
> perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.13-6.fc15
>
> If they were pushed before the perl update, there'd
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 15:48:09 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > > On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > > > d) split it to more service files
On 04/14/2011 12:51 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>
>> Can you elaborate on this?
> a) ups driver - runs when you have ups attached to that host
> b) upsd - runs when you have ups attached to that host
> c) upsmon (master/slave mode) - usualy runs on machine where you have ups,
> but it can run
> on
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 15:59 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
napisał:
> On 4/14/11 8:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
>> napisał:
>
>
> ...
>
>
>>> What kind of SSD is it?
>>
>> OCZ Vertex 2 with firmware 1.25 (this is not the latest version, but I
On 04/14/2011 02:35 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> If I use Requires= directive, it starts driver for upsd, but is it possible
> to specify to
> stop the driver when upsd stops?
>
I think that you would use BindTo= instead of Requires= in upsd.service
( that is if uspd is depend upon them being ru
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 14:46:01 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 12:51 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> >
> >> Can you elaborate on this?
> > a) ups driver - runs when you have ups attached to that host
> > b) upsd - runs when you have ups attached to that host
> > c) upsmon (master/sl
Hi,
2011/4/14 Michal Hlavinka :
> On Thursday, April 14, 2011 14:46:01 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> On 04/14/2011 12:51 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can you elaborate on this?
>> > a) ups driver - runs when you have ups attached to that host
>> > b) upsd - runs when you have ups attach
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> "Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear the
> data"
>
> I begin to wonder if it was the right decision to change main drive to SSD :)
>
> Maybe it's time to start using data=journal
If you want t
2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > "Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear the
> data"
> >
> > I begin to wonder if it was the right decision to change main drive to
> SSD :)
> >
> > Maybe it's time to
On 04/14/2011 03:14 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> I had such situation when I worked on shorewall scripts conversion. I
> just didn't converted main shorewall-init script. At that time, I just
> did not have idea how to run bash loop in systemd service:)
Using bash loop within systemd is and shou
On Thu, 14.04.11 16:35, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 14, 2011 15:48:09 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, 14.04.11 14:57, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 04/14/2011 02:35 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > If I use Requires= directive, it starts driver for upsd, but is it possible
> > to specify to
> > stop the driver when upsd stops?
> >
>
> I think that you would us
2011/4/14 Jason D. Clinton :
> 2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
>> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> > "Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear
>> > the data"
>> >
>> > I begin to wonder if it was the right decision to change main dri
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:15 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
I can't resist...how does a 'small' loss of power differ from a 'large'
loss of power? :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Ta
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/4/14 Jason D. Clinton :
>> 2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
>>> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
"Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear
the data"
I begin to
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:15 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
>
> I can't resist...how does a 'small' loss of power differ from a 'large'
> loss of power? :)
Haha only-s
2011/4/14 Adam Williamson :
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:15 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
>
> I can't resist...how does a 'small' loss of power differ from a 'large'
> loss of power? :)
'small' is for a few millisecon
Am 14.04.2011 17:38, schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
> I hope that it works this way only on NTFS and do not attempt to free
> unused Ext4 space :)
why should the FS matter for the physical layer under the FS?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
2011/4/14 Bryn M. Reeves :
> On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/4/14 Jason D. Clinton :
>>> 2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> "Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear
W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 17:53 użytkownik Reindl Harald
napisał:
>
> Am 14.04.2011 17:38, schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
>
>> I hope that it works this way only on NTFS and do not attempt to free
>> unused Ext4 space :)
>
> why should the FS matter for the physical layer under the FS?
How you want to
On 04/14/2011 03:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> In man systemd.unit
>> >
>> > BindTo=
>> > Configures requirement dependencies, very similar in style
>> > to Requires=, however in addition to this behaviour it also
>> > declares that this unit is stopped when
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:31:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.04.11 16:35, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 15:48:09 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> >
On 04/14/2011 04:19 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> /etc/sysconfig/xxx is mostly a Fedora/Red Hat idiom. I am pretty sure
>> > the Debian version of the boot scripts do not honour this request.
>Debian has mostly identical /etc/default/xxx.
>
Perhaps the same team that look at /run changes can com
2011/4/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 04/14/2011 04:19 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> /etc/sysconfig/xxx is mostly a Fedora/Red Hat idiom. I am pretty sure
>>> > the Debian version of the boot scripts do not honour this request.
>> Debian has mostly identical /etc/default/xxx.
>>
>
> Perhaps th
On Thu, 14.04.11 18:40, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2011/4/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> > On 04/14/2011 04:19 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >>> /etc/sysconfig/xxx is mostly a Fedora/Red Hat idiom. I am pretty sure
> >>> > the Debian version of the boot scripts do not honour th
On Thu, 14.04.11 16:15, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 04/14/2011 03:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> In man systemd.unit
> >> >
> >> > BindTo=
> >> > Configures requirement dependencies, very similar in style
> >> > to Requires=, however in a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RPM doesn't create /var/run/amavisd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725
Summary: RPM doesn't create /var/run/amavisd
Product: Fedora
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> The place for system configuration is /etc. I have yet to see a really
> convincing example why /etc/sysconfig/ or /etc/default would win us
> anything.
/etc/sysconfig is essentially configuration for the init system managing
daemons. Command-line opt
On Thu, 14.04.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > The place for system configuration is /etc. I have yet to see a really
> > convincing example why /etc/sysconfig/ or /etc/default would win us
> > anything.
>
> /etc/sysconfig is e
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 14.04.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
>> Since they are config files (unlike the init scripts themselves),
>> changing them doesn't leave you with RPM wanting to replace them on
>> every package update either.
>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:35:07 +0200
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14.04.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> >> Since they are config files (unlike the init scripts themselves),
> >> changing them doesn't leave you
On Thu, 14.04.11 20:35, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14.04.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> >> Since they are config files (unlike the init scripts themselves),
> >> changing them doesn't lea
On Thu, 14.04.11 15:48, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:35:07 +0200
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14.04.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> > >> Since they are config file
Compose started at Thu Apr 14 13:15:51 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 00:23 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Note however that while some settings override others some act as
> additions. Example: A later User=foo will override an earlier User=bar,
> but a later Requires=foo will be added to an earlier Requires=bar, so
> that you effectively h
Greetings testers,
As you've known that Beta has been declared gold, validation tests were
being executed to guarantee that Beta RC2 could finally meet the beta
release criteria[1]. During the tests, as expected, no beta blockers
were found and the results were summarized as below:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 19:54:36 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.04.11 16:15, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On 04/14/2011 03:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > >> In man systemd.unit
> > >> >
> > >> > BindTo=
> > >> > Configures req
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Is there a releng ticket for the koji buildroot override?
Any news on this?
- Andreas
--
BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | signed/enc
69 matches
Mail list logo
