Hello!
My name is Justin, I go by brutal_chaos on IRC, don't be shy say hi. I come
to you in hopes of becoming a (good) package maintainer for Fedora. I am
starting off by packaging a new python package, python-construct, and I am
looking for sponsorship. Below is the link to my first package's re
Hi all,
I apologise if this sounds like a bit of an extended whinge; it's not
meant to but I'm not sure how better to raise these issues.
I've spent a half-hour this morning going through various bits of pino
and raising appropriate bugs, as I'm now using F15 as my full-time
system (and I'm a hea
Hello.
I've got lots of errors from selinux with latest F-15 packages. Is
this a known issue(s)?
http://fpaste.org/Sgf5/
I was even forced to switch to permissive mode.
Also I was very surprised that systemd cannot start avahi-daemon and
rsyslogd (as well as some issues with NFS mounts, but I do
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:19:27PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello.
> I've got lots of errors from selinux with latest F-15 packages. Is
> this a known issue(s)?
>
> http://fpaste.org/Sgf5/
>
> I was even forced to switch to permissive mode.
>
tcontext=system_u:object_r:file_t:s0
Somehow
commit 2c6355b078975c2a899fb78b29715d8b55aceac1
Author: Mathieu Bridon
Date: Thu Apr 7 12:03:57 2011 +0800
Rebuild with EV support.
perl-Coro.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
index 21f6cf8..319951a 10064
2011/4/8 Tomasz Torcz :
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:19:27PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> Hello.
>> I've got lots of errors from selinux with latest F-15 packages. Is
>> this a known issue(s)?
>>
>> http://fpaste.org/Sgf5/
>>
>> I was even forced to switch to permissive mode.
>>
>
> tcontext=sys
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 04/07/2011 07:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
>>> using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
>>> I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specifi
Am 08.04.2011 12:38, schrieb Jim Meyering:
> So maybe there *is* a bug to report after all:
>
> With TMPDIR pointing to a directory with context not like /tmp,
> the kernel's initramfs-building code fails and gives a diagnostic
> (calling it Non-fatal), but lets the installation of a l
On 04/05/2011 04:42 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get NIS and /home NFS mounts working on F15. In essence,
> the dependency chain of services I need on my computer is as follows:
>
> 1. Bring up the network interface
> 2. Mount /home via NFS (maybe this should be d
On 04/05/2011 10:03 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 5 kwietnia 2011 21:49 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> W dniu 5 kwietnia 2011 21:48 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>>> Try to add some informations about ordering to ypbind script
>>>
>>> ### BEGIN INIT INFO
>>> # Pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2011 06:34 AM, Yuguang Wang wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> This is Yuguang Wang from Red Hat Beijing QE Team.
> I'm currently working on nitrate, a test case management system.
> It's an open-source project and is available here:
> https://fedorahoste
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:37:48 -0400, Brian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just giving a heads up about an update to libchamplain to the latest
> stable version. The apps affected are:
> * empathy
> * claws-mail-plugins-geolocation
> * emerillon
> * meego-panel-status
>
> I'll be working
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
> I apologise for bringing this up so late in the beta cycle - I'm sure
> the beta is spinning as I type - but I honestly don't think it can ship
> in this state.
As far as that goes - the functionality of non-vital apps within the
image is no
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:19 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello.
> I've got lots of errors from selinux with latest F-15 packages. Is
> this a known issue(s)?
You need selinux-policy-3.9.16-13.fc15 , which isn't on most mirrors
yet.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620413
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Adam,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
> > I apologise for bringing this up so late in the beta cycle - I'm sure
> > the beta is spinning as I type - but I honestly don't think it can ship
> > in this state.
>
> As f
On 04/07/2011 08:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Fedora 15 Beta RC1
Please don't mix "beta" and "RC" together. "Beta" and "RC" are two
distinct parts of the release cycle, so it's confusing to see them
together, just like it would be confusing to see an announcement about
"alpha beta".
--
deve
On Friday, April 08, 2011 12:37:17 PM Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 08:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Fedora 15 Beta RC1
>
> Please don't mix "beta" and "RC" together. "Beta" and "RC" are two
> distinct parts of the release cycle, so it's confusing to see them
> together, just like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693962
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490849&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490849&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore said:
> Chris its the teminology we have always used.
> each phase has a series of release candidates.
I thought they were called "test composes" or TC, not RC.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybod
On 04/08/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore said:
>> Chris its the teminology we have always used.
>> each phase has a series of release candidates.
> I thought they were called "test composes" or TC, not RC.
I dont see any reason why we cant use TC if RC is caus
On Friday, April 08, 2011 01:11:18 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore said:
> > Chris its the teminology we have always used.
> > each phase has a series of release candidates.
>
> I thought they were called "test composes" or TC, not RC.
the test compose is a compose we do
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-08/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-04-08-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-08/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-04-08-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2
On 04/08/2011 10:55 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, April 08, 2011 12:37:17 PM Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> On 04/07/2011 08:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
>>> Fedora 15 Beta RC1
>>
>> Please don't mix "beta" and "RC" together. "Beta" and "RC" are two
>> distinct parts of the release cycle, s
On 4/8/11 12:14 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Its the way we do it.
> F13 is the earliest mention I can find mention of "Beta RC" on
> devel-list. But that doesn't really change the validity of my
> statement. It's confusing, and we should change it.
This is fair criticism. I believe I'm the
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 4/8/11 12:14 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>> Its the way we do it.
>> F13 is the earliest mention I can find mention of "Beta RC" on
>> devel-list. But that doesn't really change the validity of my
>> statement. It's confusing, and we s
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:25:31PM +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 4/8/11 12:14 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >>> Its the way we do it.
> >> F13 is the earliest mention I can find mention of "Beta RC" on
> >> devel-list. But that doesn't
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 4/8/11 12:14 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >> Its the way we do it.
> > F13 is the earliest mention I can find mention of "Beta RC" on
> > devel-list. But that doesn't really change the validity of my
> > statement. It's confusing, an
Summary of changes:
505e29d... Initial import of perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Once upon a time, Jesse Keating said:
> Would it make more sense to refer to these as "Alpha Candidate", "Beta
> Candidate" and "Release Candidate" ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
That sounds good to me; each is distinguished frmo the other and clearly
describes what it is.
--
Chris Adams
Syste
On 04/08/2011 04:25 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>> Would it make more sense to refer to these as "Alpha Candidate", "Beta
>> Candidate" and "Release Candidate" ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
>>
...
>
> How about the sequence:
> Fn-Alpha-Pre.
Summary of changes:
505e29d... Initial import of perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> What is confusing about:
>
> Alpha-1, Alpha-2 ... Alpha-N
> Beta-1 Beta-2 Beta-N
> RC-1, RC-2 ... RC-N
> Released.
>
> Why on earth do we need a 'candidate' for a release candidate, or an
> alp
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.el4' was created pointing
to:
505e29d... Initial import of perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.el5' was created pointing
to:
505e29d... Initial import of perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On 04/08/2011 02:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 4/8/11 12:14 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>> Its the way we do it.
>> F13 is the earliest mention I can find mention of "Beta RC" on
>> devel-list. But that doesn't really change the validity of my
>> statement. It's confusing, and we should cha
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:37 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Why on earth do we need a 'candidate' for a release candidate, or an
> alpha or beta candidate. We have ordinal numbers on them ... so just use
> them.
>
>.. if RC1 is lacking - fine - we'll move to RC2 ... etc.
>
> My opinion of
I wasn't aware of the distinction between the candidates and the
naming of the files downloaded didn't help, so I think some
clarification might be worthwhile.
By downloading a couple of TCs I came across this problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694915
-Cam
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 a
On 04/08/2011 05:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:37 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> The actual pre-releases - Alpha, Beta - get distributed and promoted far
> and wide; they're required to meet certain quality standards to ensure
>
> Your scheme doesn't preserve th
On 04/08/2011 12:30 PM, Justin Noah wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My name is Justin, I go by brutal_chaos on IRC, don't be shy say hi. I
> come to you in hopes of becoming a (good) package maintainer for
> Fedora. I am starting off by packaging a new python package,
> python-construct, and I am looking for s
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:26 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> You're absolutely right ... :-) - lack of thinking on my part
>
> Your scheme does indeed have that, as does:
>
> Builds Release
> --- ---
> Alpha-
On 04/08/2011 01:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Would it make more sense to refer to these as "Alpha Candidate", "Beta
> Candidate" and "Release Candidate" ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
WFM!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC2 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Result
For the past several days I've been getting daily nagmails about the
fact that libtiff hasn't been pushed into f13 (example attached).
Because it's a critpath package, I as the lowly maintainer do not have
privileges to push it stable, not even after two weeks. Those who do
have privileges to appr
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 13:19:55 -0700,
Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> Would it make more sense to refer to these as "Alpha Candidate", "Beta
> Candidate" and "Release Candidate" ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
>
> It does mean the name will change at each stage, but it should be more
> descriptive
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 20:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I will refrain from ranting, and just point out that something is
> pretty darn broken about this process. Why are the nagmails going
> to someone with no power to fix the problem? Shouldn't somebody
> with approval power be paying more than z
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 20:43 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> The only thing broken here is the expectation that testing doesn't
> require your assistance, or isn't your problem.
Well, F13 does tend to get pretty backed up; few people are running it
any more. I boot a virt instance of it and do a fedora
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 20:43:05 -0400,
Will Woods wrote:
>
> The only thing broken here is the expectation that testing doesn't
> require your assistance, or isn't your problem.
Except this affects more than Tom. Some people aren't getting updates because
of the misunderstanding and/or lack o
Will Woods wrote:
> In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
> with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
> testing, so other stuff gets tested first.
The fact is, this is a SECURITY UPDATE and as such it should go out even
without testing. It
Related to this, fesco wanted to look at some changes for security
updates for stable releases:
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/581
Hopefully something like this would help the above case.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Currently the download directories for install and live images are called
"Fedora" and "Live", resp. Shouldn't the former be "Install" instead? After all,
everything in both directories is Fedora's, so calling one of them "Fedora"
doesn't appear helpful.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
51 matches
Mail list logo
