On 04/06/2011 02:53 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
>
>> These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
>> featured in OMG Ubuntu:
>> Dexter --
>> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-a
Dne 30.3.2011 11:48, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
> I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
> bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
> testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need more
> testing to be able to push it, please ha
I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 06.04.2011 13:21, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 30.3.2011 11:48, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
>> I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
>> bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
>> testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need mor
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide,
Petr Machata wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>
>
>> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
>> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
>> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
>>
>
> It'
2011/4/6 Petr Machata :
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>
>> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
>> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
>> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
>
> It's not our
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
Petr Machata wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>
> > I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
> > for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
> > want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
> Petr Machata wrote:
>> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>>
>> > I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
>> > for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
>> > want to star
Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have
only tried F14.)
How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd need to have some
tracing through the shutdown sequence to understand where it stops.
Andr
On 03/30/2011 02:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> - octave-3.4.0-5.fc15 has been submitted:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/octave-3.4.0-5.fc15
>
> This contains the latest macros and moves package to %{_libdir}/octave from
> %{_libexecdir}/octave. Please test.
This is pushed to stable
- Original Message -
> Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
> It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have
> only tried F14.)
>
> How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd need to have some
> tracing through the shutdown seque
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:57:36 +0200,
Petr Machata wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>
> So 1.46.1 is there for real, later to be replaced most probably by
> 1.48.0, or whatever the upstream manages to finish in the mean time.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll get updates done for the package
On 04/06/2011 05:01 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
>> It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have
>> only tried F14.)
>>
>> How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd
There will be an outage starting at 2011-04-12 04:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d ' 2011-04-12 04:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Serverbeach (our service provider
On 04/06/2011 05:35 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 05:01 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
>> Please file bug about it. And also please try the F15, there are
>> various improvements
>
> OK, I will. Thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694191
The bug is still present in f
Hi,
perhaps it is possible to add the overall count of packages available in
fedora. So we could calculate the number of updates relative to the
total number of packages. To me this seems to be a very helpful
indicator to see if there really were more updates or just more packages
which of cou
Hello everyone,
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I figured
a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which
does just that.
Keeping with the concept of sharing, I wanted
On 04/06/2011 11:05 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> A bit of history: When The Board came up with their updates vision
> statement, it included:
>
> "Project members should be able to transparently measure or monitor a
> new updates process to objectively measure its effectiveness, and
> de
Greetings.
A bit of history: When The Board came up with their updates vision
statement, it included:
"Project members should be able to transparently measure or monitor a
new updates process to objectively measure its effectiveness, and
determine whether the updates process is achieving the
a
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
>
> With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-04-06)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:51 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-04-06/fesco.2011-04-06-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2011-04-08
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars, the fifth (and hopefully last) Beta blocker review
meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
from 2.56 to 2.49.
The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
which are not
compatible to blender-2.56 or beyond.
I plan to create a feature to F-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/Live/
> Now we can get down to the desktop validation testing:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Beta_TC
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:47:19 +0200, Jochen wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
> from 2.56 to 2.49.
>
> The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
> which are not
> compatible to blender-2.56 or beyond.
>
> I plan to
2011/4/6 Jochen Schmitt :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hallo,
>
> I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
> from 2.56 to 2.49.
>
> The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
> which are not
> compatible to blender-2.56
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2011-04-06 18:28:33 EDT ---
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.fc14, perl-5.12.3-142.fc14, per
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:31:49PM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Just installed another machine and realized this isn't yet in Fedora.
> Any luck getting this upstream? We should probably at the least see
> if we can get this into the fedpkg package. It already adds bash
> completion foo and
On 4/6/2011 11:11, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
>
> With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which
> does just that.
>
> Keeping with
31 matches
Mail list logo
