-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:06 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: firefox/xulrunner-bin confusion
Fired up top on my F-15
On 03/30/2011 11:48 AM, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Hi fellow Fedorans.
>
> I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
> bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
> testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need more
> testing to be ab
Fedora QA holds Test Day regarding ABRT 2 and Retrace Server
on March 31:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-31_ABRT_Retrace_Server
This test day will focus on Retrace Server feature [1] in
Fedora 15 as well as ABRT 2.0. Refreshed and bright new
test cases are prepared for your cons
Am 31.03.2011 01:38, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>> /etc is static configuration data.
>
> There are a number of things under /etc that are not static
> configuration data.
>
>> /etc is read-only during boot.
>>
>> /run is writable all the way.
>
> /etc/run
On 03/30/2011 03:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> Also, can somebody point me to the plac
On 03/30/2011 04:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 04:05:27 PM Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 30.03
On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
> >>
> >> Applications must never create or require special files or
> >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> >> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package.
> >>
> >
> > Well, w
On 03/31/2011 12:06 PM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
> Am 31.03.2011 00:38, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>> I can do a review in exchange for hotot
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692281
> Hi Rahul,
>
> I've taken the review request. It would be nice if you could review
> liblouisutdml for me
On 03/31/2011 02:56 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:06 AM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: f
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote
> >>> NM supports static IPs these days. So I think
Hi folks,
Could you please glance through this? I intend to commit it tomorrow.
> http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/comps-diff-design-suite.patch
Thanks,
Ankur
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Could you please glance through this? I intend to commit it tomorrow.
I'd suggest listing digikam at least as optional.
If you do, you'll probably also want a:
kipi-plugins
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
This doesn't seem right. Can't compare across releases?
Original Message
Subject: rpmguard: PASSED; 0 warnings for netcdf-4.1.2-1.fc16
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:14:27 + (UTC)
From: aut...@fedoraproject.org
To: autoqa-resu...@lists.fedorahosted.org, netcdf-ow...@fedoraproject
First of all, I do not want to take any credit for this idea, it belongs
to John Rose, and has been bouncing around, trying to come to life,
since July 2010. I am just happy to help it finally hatch!
John, Jared, Paul, Max, and I all want to thank Fedora users and
contributors for everything that
On 03/31/2011 01:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> This doesn't seem right. Can't compare across releases?
At the moment, this is expected behavior. Rpmguard only compares builds
within a release or, more specifically, within a koji tag (dist-f16 in
this particular case).
If you would like to see
Hi
Just a find on my Fedora 15 system for .la files, results in the
following. Do we run any routine tests for things like this? is AutoQA
meant to improve packaging?
---
/usr/lib64/gnome-bluetooth/libgnome-bluetooth-applet.la
/usr/lib64/gnome-shell/libgnome-shell.la
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-
On 03/31/2011 02:31 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> I'll whip up a Feature page (probably we'll announce it for F-16) if
> there's an interest.
Sure. That would be awesome.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote
>
On 03/31/2011 01:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
Applications must never create or require special files or
subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
hierarchy provide more than enou
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:22:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >> Applications must never create or require special files or
> > >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> > >> hiera
On 04/01/2011 03:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a find on my Fedora 15 system for .la files, results in the
> following. Do we run any routine tests for things like this? is AutoQA
> meant to improve packaging?
I sense a misunderstanding. Though it's right, in general *.la's should
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:20:03AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > domainname is only used for NIS,
> Hmm, this doesn't match with my understanding. Doma
22 matches
Mail list logo