On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:01:28 -0600, Dennis wrote:
> The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
>
> failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the
> list of all things not built yet at
> http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
> there is ~400 packa
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
>
> failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the
> list of all things not built yet at
> http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
This
Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:01:28 -0600, Dennis wrote:
>
> > The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
> >
> > failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the
> > list of all things not buil
On 10 February 2011 05:49, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 06:23:57 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> so the mass rebuild is 24 hours in we have completed ~45% of the builds and
>> are at 365 packages failed to build the total number of builds in the mass
>> rebuild is 10404 we are
I am running the x86_64 flavours of fully updated F14 and the current
Fedora development tree on a system which is equipped with a Radeon
X800 PCIe video adapter. After resuming from suspend, OpenGL is
broken, e.g. glxgears only shows a black window, and when mutter is
the default compositor/wm, th
On Friday, February 11, 2011 07:34:07 am Mat Booth wrote:
>
> Do you have a list of the ones that were not submitted or going to
> submit them yourself?
GLC_lib
HotEqn
Pixie
SOAPpy
YafaRay
abcde
aboot
ace
acpitool
adanaxisgpl
aide
aircrack-ng
anerley
ant
apel
apmud
arora
asl
aspell-pl
asterisk
at
On Friday, February 11, 2011 04:16:44 am Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> > The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
> >
> > failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and
> > the list of all th
Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 10:34 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 04:16:44 am Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> > > The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
> > >
> > > failures can be fou
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Christoph Frieben
wrote:
> I am running the x86_64 flavours of fully updated F14 and the current
> Fedora development tree on a system which is equipped with a Radeon
> X800 PCIe video adapter. After resuming from suspend, OpenGL is
> broken,
Is thi
Since I'm not using it anymore, I'd like to orphan rubygem-eventmachine.
Any takers?
Thanks, Ruben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
=
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Alpha Blocker Bug Review
=
Meeting started by jlaska at 17:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-02-11/f15alpha-bu
Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 20:20, Joshua C. wrote:
> Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
or 2.6.37 even :-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11 February 2011 16:34, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> yes you need to push them though bodhi.
I'm having trouble here.
olpc-powerd-31-1.fc15 is the version made before the rebuild
olpc-powerd failed to compile in the rebuild due to using a gcc flag
which no longer exists.
(that was olpc-powerd-31-
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> asterisk
This one should be taken care of now. I suspect that something in
F15/rawhide changed that made Asterisk's build system think that an
optional dependency was now a mandatory one.
--
Jeff Ollie
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On 2/10/11 7:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore writes:
>> We have also mass branched everything.
>
> ... so, given that I've used "fedpkg co -B" to create a working tree
> with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
> subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's
Greetings.
I just orphaned gdk-pixbuf in pkgdb.
It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
nothing I need. ;)
% repoquery --source --whatrequires gdk-pixbuf
gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-38.fc12.src.rpm
gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-38.fc12.src.rpm
gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-38.fc12.src.rpm
gdk-pixbuf-
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers
> don't want them.
Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-02-11/releng.2011-02-11-20.11.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-02-11/releng.2011-02-11-20.11.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-02-11/releng.2011-02
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
>
>> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers
>> don't want them.
>>
>
> Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead.
>
> Bill
>
If he wants to orphan it, I will.
-J
--
i
On 02/11/2011 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> asterisk
>
> This one should be taken care of now. I suspect that something in
> F15/rawhide changed that made Asterisk's build system think that an
> optional dependency was now a mandator
2011/2/11 Colin Walters:
> Is this a regression? Those are definitely a priority. Have you
> tried a nightly live image to see if the bug is fixed in our
> development branch?
As a matter of fact this issue affects F14 up to the very latest
Fedora development tree which I had used for a few week
On Friday, February 11, 2011 01:38:20 pm Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 11 February 2011 16:34, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > yes you need to push them though bodhi.
>
> I'm having trouble here.
>
> olpc-powerd-31-1.fc15 is the version made before the rebuild
>
> olpc-powerd failed to compile in the rebu
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>
>>> asterisk
>>
>> This one should be taken care of now. I suspect that something in
>> F15/rawhide changed that made Asterisk's
On 2/12/2011 5:24 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 20:20, Joshua C. wrote:
>> Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
> or 2.6.37 even :-)
Yeah I'm also curious about this. Is F14 going to get another kernel
update or will F15 be the next recipient of a
Jesse Keating writes:
> On 2/10/11 7:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... so, given that I've used "fedpkg co -B" to create a working tree
>> with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
>> subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than
>> "rm -rf and re-cl
On 2/11/11 5:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>> On 2/10/11 7:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> ... so, given that I've used "fedpkg co -B" to create a working tree
>>> with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
>>> subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's
27 matches
Mail list logo
