On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
>> about
>>
>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl)
>>
>> The depchecker is correct about that: th
On 03/02/11 10:15, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
>>> about
>>>
>>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc
Heyyas,
Actually since my mailbox was filled recently and mail bounced for a
short time period i do not get any review-request mails anymore from
bugzilla. Can someone actually check the autocc on it? Other mails
from bugzilla arrive (again).
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
devel mailing list
deve
On 02/03/2011 12:28 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 03/02/11 10:15, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500
>>> Tom Lanewrote:
>>>
For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
about
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 19:20 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 02/02/2011 14:09, Patrick MONNERAT a écrit :
> >
> > There is a project I would like to package: this is
> > http://php-yubico.googlecode.com/. This project is using PEAR support
> > and assumes a PEAR installation (in the Auth subdirecto
Paul Howarth writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
>> about
>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl)
> RPM 4.9 has made changes in the provides/requires extraction code that
> are not entirely backwards-compatible.
On 03/02/11 15:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Paul Howarth writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
>>> about
>>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl)
>
>> RPM 4.9 has made changes in the provides/requires extraction code tha
On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5
> (git).
> Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to
> this issue?
It was bug 641944. It was fixed after 1.2.7.5 was released.
> Thanks,
>
On 02/03/2011 08:19 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>> I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5
>> (git).
>> Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to
>> this issue?
> It was bug 641944.
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> there something
On 2/3/11 1:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
>> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
>> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configu
On 2/1/11 6:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
>>> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
>>> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>>>
>>> I would assume its th
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:58:27 -0800, Adam wrote:
> QA and Desktop teams are running three Test Days to test out GNOME 3
> ahead of F15 (and GNOME 3.0) releases, and the first is tomorrow!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-03_GNOME3_Alpha
>
> Please come along and help test - the
On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> the
Hi,
> Well, my Rawhide is still stuck with XFCE, because GNOME doesn't work.
> Creating a fresh user account and logging in starts lots of GNOME related
> processes, but ends with an empty screen with blue background and a
> movable mouse pointer. Any ideas on that?
Unfourtuanty I don't have a so
On 02/03/2011 12:44 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>> Well, my Rawhide is still stuck with XFCE, because GNOME doesn't work.
>> Creating a fresh user account and logging in starts lots of GNOME related
>> processes, but ends with an empty screen with blue background and a
>> movable mouse pointer. An
TL;DR if you have a working rawhide system, you may want to refrain
from updating it for a little while.
I have been maintaining a headless rawhide system for more than two years,
updating every 1-4 days. There have been a few hassles, but nothing
terrible. Today however, after an update and a y
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:21:56PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> [0.737139] Kernel panic - not syncing: UFS: Unable to mount root fs on
> unXno
> wn-block(0,0)
> [0.737820] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted
> 2.6.38-0.rc3.git0.1.fc15.x86_64
> #1
> [0.738435] CaII Trace:
> [0.738714
> Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first
> tried the latest nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso,
> but that has its own problem:
>
> "Install to harddrive" fails with "not a live image"
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/672265
I was able to compose a DVD of today's rawhid
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.04-2.fc15' was created pointing
to:
31fe10b... Initial import of perl-Module-Metadata-1.04-2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
2011/2/3 John Reiser:
> Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first tried the latest
> nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso, ..
Recent install media can be found at:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Alpha.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/
in particular a working netinst.is
On 2011/02/03 23:08 (GMT+0100) Christoph Frieben composed:
> John Reiser wrote:
>> Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first tried the
>> latest nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso, ..
> Recent install media can be found at:
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/
So it seems that Audacious is not as flexible between its own different
version releases? What is with that?
Surely that much can't change between releases to make the plug-ins fail
between versions?
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
ABN: 98
Hi,
I'm currently packaging Mono-2.10 RC2 for rawhide but have hit a snag
and I'm not sure if it's Fedora or mono, so I'm seeking advice.
The error I'm getting is
make[8]: Entering directory
`/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILD/mono-2.10/mcs/tools/gacutil'
MCS [basic] gacutil.exe
Inconsistency detecte
Hi,
Using the current spin on rawhide but seem to have lost where I set the
startup applications and preferred apps up from. The used to be under
Preferences but seem to have vanished.
Any idea what I need to re-install to get it back. There is nothing
under System Settings which lets me do this.
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 00:05 +, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using the current spin on rawhide but seem to have lost where I set the
> startup applications and preferred apps up from. The used to be under
> Preferences but seem to have vanished.
>
> Any idea what I need to re-install to ge
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications
> should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the
> desktop providing a central config point.
Is there a replacement for "Automatically remember running applications
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:04 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> I tried to net (minimal) install 40 hours ago and got no initrd and thus no
> boot. Culprit was less not installed. I made a working initrd via chroot and
> yum install less. Still when done, ethX cannot be found, so I have no network
> ex
Adam Williamson wrote:
> it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications
> should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the
> desktop providing a central config point.
To the GNOME developers (Adam, I know you are just the messenger):
This is very broke
29 matches
Mail list logo