Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 09.12.10 10:51, Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) wrote: > Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own, > but please keep the gratuitous "me too"ing to a minimum. > Here is my feature request: I want some kind of D-Bus interface which I can use to hook up "syste

mda priorities (alternatives --install)

2010-12-22 Thread Richard Zidlicky
Hi, noticed that esmtp "replaced" exim because of higher priority - is this expected? Personally I would classify esmtp as a per-user tool rather than systemwide one and make sure it gets lower priority than any of the traditional smtp servers. Richard --- Name and OpenPGP keys available from

Re: What drives RPM Provides for shared libraries?

2010-12-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 23:28 -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote: > On 12/21/2010 09:43 PM, Nicholas Miell wrote: > > > > ld.so isn't happy with that (lookups aren't based on filenames, so > > symlinks won't do anything and it will never find the library). > > > > You need to create an empty shared librar

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-22 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/22/2010 11:29 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 09.12.10 10:51, Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own, >> but please keep the gratuitous "me too"ing to a minimum. >> > > Here is my feature request: > > I want s

[perl-String-ShellQuote] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit ca19428c163b34a42f63579029b15f7455936e2f Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 12:32:13 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-String-ShellQuote.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-String-Sh

64 bit mono packages missing

2010-12-22 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Other than log4net, sharpcvslib and ndoc (log4net and ndoc are reliant on .NET 1.1 libs so are dead in the water), I'm going to see if I can get nant to build for 64 bit architectures over the next day or so Here's hoping! TTFN Paul -- Vertraue mir, ich weiss, was ich mache... -- dev

[perl-Sub-Identify] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 7c1515aeb0c7635daadd20ade7123de404a9cf11 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 12:43:03 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Sub-Identify.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Sub-Identify.s

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 22.12.10 12:25, Jiri Moskovcak (jmosk...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > I remember it and it's in our TODO list, but has a low priority, so > that's why it's taking so long and we can prioritize this if needed. > Btw, ABRT has a dbus interface, but probably not flexible enough to use

64 bit mono packages missing

2010-12-22 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Other than log4net, sharpcvslib and ndoc (log4net and ndoc are reliant on .NET 1.1 libs so are dead in the water), I'm going to see if I can get nant to build for 64 bit architectures over the next day or so Here's hoping! TTFN Paul -- Vertraue mir, ich weiss, was ich mache... -- dev

Re: RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-12-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I know that you're not proposing this, but can I just interject that if you make any of these files unreadable by 'other', then supermin appliance building will break. http://libguestfs.org/febootstrap.8.html#supermin_appliances I think supermin appliances are a sufficiently useful mechanism to g

Re: Review swap

2010-12-22 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
19.12.2010 23:53, Thibault North пишет: > On December 19, 2010 02:56:05 pm Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: >> Hello, Thibault. >> >> I ready swap and took it. > Thanks Pavel. Let me know which one I can review for you. > Thibault I'm mos interest in review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

[perl-SVN-Simple] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 7fedd33c073bfcc62e39ed8fb9c363cd68d94d56 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 13:54:03 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-SVN-Simple.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-SVN-Simple.spec

Re: Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC

2010-12-22 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2010-12-21 07:29:14 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC Sorry, I missed up the date here, it should have been 2010-12-22. Also, the outage is now over. The database logs confirm that apart from our testing, the vulnerability was never exploited on our

[perl-Task-Catalyst] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 0a132e2a4cce783fb6e0eb9f1ad06312cf787849 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 15:23:53 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Task-Catalyst.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Task-Catalyst

[perl-Template-Alloy] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 9c1dd553fe797a8a26fa0c9804e0d08142cfae04 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 15:37:20 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Template-Alloy.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Template-All

[perl-TAP-Formatter-HTML] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit cdb0a083fc90c961da7c105523ceb3d982129f07 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 15:07:43 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-TAP-Formatter-HTML.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-TAP-Form

Re: What drives RPM Provides for shared libraries?

2010-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Panu Matilainen writes: > One possibility is to keep the upstream created symlinks and add the > necessary provides manually in the spec. Right offhand that seems less magic than the ELF-hacking alternatives. However, how do I get the conditional "(64bit)" property on the Provides items? I hope

Re: What drives RPM Provides for shared libraries?

2010-12-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 09:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Panu Matilainen writes: > > One possibility is to keep the upstream created symlinks and add the > > necessary provides manually in the spec. > > Right offhand that seems less magic than the ELF-hacking alternatives. > However, how do I get th

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-22 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 12/17/2010 07:34 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 18:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> * we are building packages against the known-to-be-broken package > > The old package is already in stable. We're not doing additional harm > by building against it unless the "breakage" is

[perl-Term-Size-Perl] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 7752a95b1dbd3519126eb117d087b69131ed39ad Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 17:07:13 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Term-Size-Perl.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Term-Size-Pe

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > From a quick glance over this looks good to me, and I would be happy to > start trying to make test cases. A few random things: > > * Would it be worth noting that anyone can make a test case, it doesn't > need to be the maintainer, right

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 18:12 -0500, James Laska wrote: > > the first isn't particularly specific to this, but it was a prerequisite > > that I discovered was missing: it's a guide to test case creation in > > general, explaining the actual practical process of how you create a > > test case, and th

[perl-Test-Email] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 3e5789b9e755eacfb7a8bbcdcba93e83e9debfd6 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 18:37:15 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-Email.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Email.spec

Minutes/Summary from today's (non) FESCo meeting (2010-12-22)

2010-12-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:19:09 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. Note that we may not have quorum, so may adjourn > early. Indeed this happened. ;)

[perl-Test-Exception] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 9183adf89bc0d523568d79eeca90f62dcf3c3c66 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 18:42:16 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-Exception.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Excepti

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again > became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing > package-specific test instructions, and particularly specific > instructions for testing critical p

[perl-Test-Expect] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 8cc40088763f1cc5f66507af0783f199a3b52404 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 18:47:27 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-Expect.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Expect.spe

[perl-Test-File] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit b10afc77c4e79308a17afa4f065206569179ffe3 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 18:52:20 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-File.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-File.spec b/

[perl-Test-File-Contents] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 5d308a17142478c023f622b6534840d300aa1675 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 18:57:22 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-File-Contents.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Fil

Re: What drives RPM Provides for shared libraries?

2010-12-22 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:43:51AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Panu Matilainen writes: > > One possibility is to keep the upstream created symlinks and add the > > necessary provides manually in the spec. > > Right offhand that seems less magic than the ELF-hacking alternatives. > However, how do I

[perl-Test-MockObject] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit a2bcaf93701dbc60285e371b30ca48ab4d1a4734 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 19:46:45 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-MockObject.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-MockOb

[perl-Test-Manifest] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit b70b3376bdaf7229e4369fc6c5ba22e31e4aaa40 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 19:30:37 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-Manifest.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Manifest

[perl-Test-MockTime] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 310d72665e7653a16016d6b7f0907ea1890def7f Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 19:52:03 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-MockTime.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-MockTime

Re: What drives RPM Provides for shared libraries?

2010-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Toshio Kuratomi writes: > Another thought is that within the distro, patching software to stop using > the deprecated library name is what we want. For Fedora, removing the > compatibility symlink, not providing an alternative, and rebuilding any > packages that use the older library name may be

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-22 Thread Casey Dahlin
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:16:21PM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > This is from Paul Davis, the main architect of Jack (I forwarded him > your post): > > > this isn't exactly correct. > > in /dev/shm on linux we have: > > (a) unix-domain sockets for non-RT communication with the

[perl-Test-Unit] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 8570242e61d88779b6f49a53dd8b619193c0166b Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 22:01:25 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Test-Unit.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Unit.spec b/

[HEADS-UP] MySQL 5.5 coming soon to rawhide

2010-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Since MySQL AB^W^WSun^WOracle has now declared the mysql 5.5.x release series to be GA status, I'm planning to push it into rawhide shortly to replace the 5.1.x series. Theoretically, this will go pretty smoothly. I'm aware of a couple of ABI-level issues: 1. libmysqlclient.so, which is linked i

[perl-Text-CHM] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 722e8682792b97e477f247cb4fdca13cb87ae919 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 22 23:35:10 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Text-CHM.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Text-CHM.spec b/pe

Re: RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-12-21 klockan 11:47 -0500 skrev Colin Walters: > "But they still have uid 0, which typical system installation allows > root to do things. For example, /bin/sh is 0755 and /bin is also 0755 > perms. A disarmed root process can still trojan a system. But what if > we got rid of all the rea

Re: RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-12-21 klockan 18:52 -0500 skrev i.g...@comcast.net: > Ok, so who says that the files must be owned by root? Make them owned by > some other user -- say, bin? (or does that have another use that my > google search isn't coming up with?) Better to make the process not run as root imho. Re

Re: RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-12-22 klockan 00:59 +0100 skrev Miloslav Trmač: > This is possible, but it would be a much larger change to the system. > To take a particular example, look at /etc/shadow. > > It needs to be protected against attackers, so it should not be owned by > root - let's make it owned by "adm",

Re: [packager interface suggestion] Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-12-21 klockan 13:02 -0500 skrev Matt McCutchen: > updates-testing explicitly. Either variant of the approach has the > danger though that because a build needs one thing from updates-testing, > it will end up getting something else from updates-testing that the > maintainer didn't expect

Summer of Code - time to do something, anything ... but not by me

2010-12-22 Thread Karsten Wade
Folks: For this coming year, if Fedora chooses to participate in the Google Summer of Code (and I think we should), I have decided that I am not going to be involved. This is not complete abandonment. In fact, the below blog post is the first of potentially several that can be part of a package

Re: [packager interface suggestion] Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-12-21 klockan 09:50 -0700 skrev Kevin Fenzi: > Basically it's changing spec files BuildRequires to suit our build > setup and not for 'the version this package needs to build'. True. And it's use should be limited to the release branches of a package, not master/rawhide. Imho it adds

/etc/mtab

2010-12-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
What's preventing us from symlinking /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and get rid of confusing situations when mtab gets out of sync with the kernel? I tried running my system for a few months this way. The only regressions I'm seeing are: 1) the Gnome Disk Mounter panel applet seems to get confused. Af