Hi,
I am receiving the following email from Koji:
fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.
noarch requires python-lirc
On i386:
fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch req
Hi,
I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
* I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
not maintain them in EPEL) - Stop this silly mail-bombardment!
* The broken deps these
Compose started at Sun Dec 19 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.9()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x8
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am receiving the following email from Koji:
>
>
>
> fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
> On x86_64:
> fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.
> noarch require
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am receiving the following email from Koji:
> >
> >
> >
> > fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tr
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:24:56 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
> from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
>
> * I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
> not maintain them in EPEL
Hi packagers,
I have an easy package to review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298
autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line.
Anyone interested in a review swap ?
Thanks,
Thibault
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL.
>
> I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago,
> and I run it there just fine.
>
> I will do the request as you suggested.
You may also wish to
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
> them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
> ownership.
>
> In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL
> package: http
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:05:09 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Nonsense. The current releng procedure is bureaucracy and a
> bottle-neck. (How often does releng reject koji buildroot override
> requests?)
Not sure. I haven't been subscribed to the list too long...
> I'm in favour of permitting p
Hello, Thibault.
I ready swap and took it.
19.12.2010 20:59, Thibault North wrote:
> Hi packagers,
>
> I have an easy package to review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298
> autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line.
>
> Anyone interested in a revie
On December 19, 2010 02:56:05 pm Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> Hello, Thibault.
>
> I ready swap and took it.
Thanks Pavel. Let me know which one I can review for you.
Thibault
> 19.12.2010 20:59, Thibault North wrote:
> > Hi packagers,
> >
> > I have an easy package to review:
>
Hi,
I asked about PGSQL 9 for F14 but it was too late. So how is it now?
Any plans for PGSQL 9 and MySQL 5.5 in F15?
--
Best regards,
Michal
Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Yes.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/12/19 Tom Lane :
> Yes.
Great :)
Will it be possible to easily rebuild PGSQL 9 packages for RHEL 6?
>
> regards, tom lane
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Best regards,
Michal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed that Comfortaa is not listed in Fonts group using PackageKit
or yum groupinfo command. Have newer fonts past Fedora 13 similar issue?
If so, how to fix that problem?
- --
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W
16 matches
Mail list logo