On 11/23/2010 06:51 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> IMO, the real problem is not "backports" vs. "upgrading" to "fix bugs",
> it's bugs not getting fixed in Fedora, for a variety of reasons.
>
> Therefore, I consider trying to apply any such simple "policy" to be
> impossible and naive.
Agreeable logi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Checksums:
586b4a829c5906ab4223616cab8595d9 CPAN-Checksums-2.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
commit aef9502287e05b1bdb0bf988e34480c1f2dd5010
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Tue Nov 23 09:32:20 2010 +0100
New upstream release, v2.07
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Checksums.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletion
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:32:26 +0100
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2010/11/12 Kevin Fenzi :
>> > Any other exciting work in progress that might land in F15 that
>> > people are actively working on?
>>
>> How about removing some old u
While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
following error occurred:
Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
bdb(dc=linuxdev,dc=datasphere,dc=ch): Build signature doesn't match
environment
bdb_db_open: database "dc=linuxdev,dc=datasphe
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:11:13 +0100 Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server,
> the following error occurred: [...]
Have you reported it as a bug against the openldap package?
Have you tried yum downgrade to the previous version?
Michal
--
devel
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 11:23 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:11:13 +0100 Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> > While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server,
> > the following error occurred: [...]
>
> Have you reported it as a bug against the openldap package?
Not
hi, I want share a usb key via IP and I have found this project:
http://usbip.sourceforge.net/
Someone can help me to find the usbip_common_mod.ko, vhci-hcd.ko and
usbip.ko module for fedora 14?
Into Readme file of project, for build the driver i see this:
"For newer kernels ( >=2.6.28
Compose started at Tue Nov 23 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
bognor-regis-0.6.11-1
On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
> following error occurred:
>
> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
> Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
> bdb(dc=linuxdev,dc=datasphere,dc=ch): Build signature doesn't match
> en
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
>> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
>> following error occurred:
>>
>> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
>> Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
>> bdb(dc=linuxdev,dc=dat
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
>>> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
>>> following error occurred:
>>>
>>> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
>>> Checking configurati
mån 2010-11-22 klockan 18:51 +0100 skrev Björn Persson:
> Henrik Nordström wrote:
> > * Slight adjustment of karma to provide choices "Works for me", "Problem
> > still present" and "New problems seen"
> >
> > * "Works for me" is a +1, and also adds the refereced bug as fixed by
> > the update if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Summary: libwx_gtk2u_stc-2
Hi,
As you may be aware, Novell recently sold itself/merged/whatever to
another company with the transfer of 882 patents to MS. No idea what
this will mean with the SCO legal case, but hey.
My question regards Mono now. With the sale of Novell and MS gaining a
pile of patents, will this affect th
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Paul F. Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may be aware, Novell recently sold itself/merged/whatever to
> another company with the transfer of 882 patents to MS. No idea what
> this will mean with the SCO legal case, but hey.
>
> My question regards Mono now. With the
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:55 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Patric, thank you for reporting this. And sorry for the difficulties.
You're welcome. And never mind for the difficulties: I understand your
trouble and I wouldn't be in such a sh... myself !
I succeeded in restoring the LDAP usability by do
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 22:45 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:41:47AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > The thing is, we really need to be able to boot a kernel in qemu as
> > > non-root, and carrying around a separately compiled or packaged kerne
Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
openjpeg package in Fedora. Callum Lerwick has been AWOL for a long time
now and has even said that he is not interested in long term maintenance of
packages in a post over a year ago.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dev
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:09 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really long time. I
> have testing data with 56 entries (nodes) - exporting (slapcat) is quite
> fast,
> but importing (slapadd) takes around 10 seconds.
>
> Imagine you have a large
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
> convert scripts themselves.
How can I get information about all packages that provides init scripts?
When
Il giorno mar, 23/11/2010 alle 15.55 +0100, Henrik Nordström ha scritto:
>
> Fedora do not normally include staging kernel drivers, but you can
> find them on rpmfusion.
>
> I have not looked into if the specific drivers you are looking for is
> there however.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Thanks Henr
> "AH" == Adam Hough writes:
AH> Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
AH> openjpeg package in Fedora.
It has two comaintainers, so I don't really see what the issue is.
I went ahead and gave those comaintainers approveacls permission on the
Fedora branches so
> "MP" == Michał Piotrowski writes:
MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
MP> scripts?
repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:09 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Am I allowed to write some additional output in %pre/%post scriptlets? And
> shall I use stdout or stderr? I haven't found it in guidelines.
I was always told "no output allowed", which is sad. Sure, it might not
be seen in all cases. What w
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
>> convert scripts themselves.
>
> How can I get information about all p
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:18:44 +0100 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> scripts?
>
> When I do
> rpm -qf /etc/init.d/*
> I get only information about already installed packages. Any magic
> switch to get informations about all packages from r
On 11/22/10 11:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It was my understanding o
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 17:18:44 +0100,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
> > We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
> > maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
> > convert scripts themselves.
>
Summary of changes:
89ff2c1... initial import (*)
8d97dfc... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
528eadb... dist-git conversion (*)
a8068ee... update to 0.13 (*)
59f0696... Merge branch 'master' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
commit 59f06963e29f1e90761e07ee1a9925673091ab74
Merge: 37bf1d5 a8068ee
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Nov 23 17:26:06 2010 +0100
Merge branch 'master' into el6
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec | 15 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deleti
On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
> * if minor version of openldap changes (e.g. 2.3 -> 2.4), export the database,
> delete it and import it back (
Once upon a time, Jan Vcelak said:
> Am I allowed to write some additional output in %pre/%post scriptlets? And
> shall I use stdout or stderr? I haven't found it in guidelines.
No, because there's no telling where it will go.
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really lo
On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
> action should be coordinated.
>
> Comments, thoughts?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michal
I created this a while back so just take your pick from there fill it
with a link to the n
2010/11/23 Jason L Tibbitts III :
>> "MP" == Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
> MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> MP> scripts?
>
> repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
It seems to me that too little packages was returned
>
> - J<
> --
> devel mailing list
2010/11/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
>> action should be coordinated.
>>
>> Comments, thoughts?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Michal
>
> I created this a while back so just take
On 11/23/2010 05:30 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
>> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
>> * if minor version of openldap changes (e.g. 2.3 -> 2.4), exp
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:44 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> > * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
>> > any luck).
>>
>> Not without a pile of X changes, which themselves
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:21 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Why was this update made on F14 in the first place?
> >
> IMO, this is the wrong question.
>
> The better questions would be - How could it happen, this package made
> it into updates, dispite all this QA bureaucracy is in place?
Reme
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:44 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
> >> >
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:21 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> So taking for example the much much discussed KDE rebases. I think that
>> doing a KDE rebase for Fedora #+1 is a no brainer, for Fedora # is fine
>> as long as it is properly tested and for Fedora #-1 KDE should N
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
>> convert scripts themselves.
I'll try to do it for Firebird package
ca
Till Maas wrote:
> It is totally annoying and time consuming to hit fixed bugs again, just
> because the update has not been pushed from testing to stable. I cannot
> really imagine that I am the only one experiencing this ever and ever
> again. E.g. just today when I wanted to debug f-e-k on the F
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:29:45PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Here's the latest list of ideas culled from this thread.
>
> Note: these are NOT my ideas, I am just gathering them up so fesco can
> discuss them.
>
> Feel free to add more concrete ideas, or let me know if I missed one
> you had p
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:32 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Note that Fedora #-2 does not fit into this view for things at all,
> >> Fedora #-2 is meant to allow people to skip a Fedora release. But in
> >> practice I think this works out badly, because a relatively new Fedora
> >> release like Fe
W dniu 23 listopada 2010 18:35 użytkownik philippe makowski
napisał:
> 2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
>> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> So feel free to push directly to stable as often as you want, but once
> you introduce one regression, you have to satisfy 10 karma on every
> package you update. The second time, you have to satisfy 20 karma on
> every package you update and so on.
At that point you can just
commit 00a0544321e44ecc180451ab680e896bd6550231
Author: Rich Megginson
Date: Tue Nov 23 10:47:50 2010 -0700
forgot to add -DUSE_SSL -DPRLDAP for the openldap case
Makefile.PL.rpm|2 +-
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |5 -
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
di
Summary of changes:
00a0544... forgot to add -DUSE_SSL -DPRLDAP for the openldap case (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Right, and the big point there should be that a bug which can corrupt
>> mail folders should be fixed IMMEDIATELY, i.e. with a direct stable push!
>> ANY testing requirement there is a failure.
>
> How about tes
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> So you'll double, triple, ultra swear that this[1] will never happen
> again?
>
> [1]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2008-December/002572.html
That wasn't a data corruption issue in the first place. It was a low-severity
security fix, and the fix
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Install package from updates-testing, then +1 to karma after it works
> for you with your tests and normal workload.
The average user won't even KNOW there's an update available in updates-
testing before it's too late (i.e. all his/her data is gone, (s)he asks on
forums or IR
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The bodhi 2.0 solution is to decouple autopush and acceptance: they
> really shouldn't be paired, I think it's just an unintended consequence
> of the current code. You should be able to set +1 threshold for
> acceptance allowing the maintainer to then push manually, and +3
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> (And yeah, if we allow +1 autopush, we should definitely expect -1 is
> sufficient to unpush. Maybe bodhi should restrict the combination of
> those two settings, rather than either one alone?)
Not as long people give -1 for random crap "oh thi
Till Maas wrote:
> Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
> thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
> this would be helpful.
* Upgrade paths! I DON'T want my foo-1.2.3-4.fc13 update to go out before my
foo-1.2.3-4.fc14 update, even if it h
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I believe Kevin would say his position is that the update is better than
> what's there already *sufficiently often* that allowing unrestricted
> updates is a net benefit (the question is whether an occasional bad
> update is a worse problem than some updates being delayed
Tom Lane wrote:
> (And yeah, if we allow +1 autopush, we should definitely expect -1 is
> sufficient to unpush. Maybe bodhi should restrict the combination of
> those two settings, rather than either one alone?)
Well, we've started to use +1/-999 for some KDE updates. :-)
Kevin Kofler
-
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 05:30 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
>>> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
>>> * if minor
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -Installs PackageKit plugin to give karma through the gnome-packagekit
> GUI. (Nothing exists yet, but I'm gonna get started on one soon)
What about KPackageKit?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:06:33PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
> > thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
> > this would be helpful.
>
> * Upgrade paths! I DON'T want my foo-1.2.
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> We don't control RH bugzilla so changing bugzilla to be able to use fas to
> login would be problematic.
The right solution would really be to have a separate Fedora Bugzilla tied
in to Fedora infrastructure, with bug states which make sense for Fedora,
not RHEL etc.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> On 10:05:21 am Sunday, November 21, 2010 Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After getting latest updates (glibc and eclise), I started getting
> > reproducible Eclipse out of memory errors (happens during AppEngine
> > deploys). Ha
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 19:13:09, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Another related thing is that Berkeley DB which openldap uses is
>> notoriously picky about getting updated. I'm fairly certain openldap does
>> not update their bundled BDB version to prevent
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:51 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Just submitted to updates-testing. Please, test.
>
> 656257 - Upgrade from 2.4.22-7 to 2.4.23-3 breaks slapd
> 655899 - outdated list of overlays in slapd.conf
> 652822 - ldapsearch -Z hangs server if starttls fails
>
> Jan
Many thanks Jan,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> It might not to work for proprietary drivers, but that's those drivers'
>> problem. KDE basically requires XRandR since at least 4.0.
>>
>
> this is a fairly new thing, AIUI:
>
> http://mjg59.livejournal.com/1271
commit 9ca9b1658ed1c65de7c6297a24e1a17132aec3e3
Author: remi
Date: Tue Nov 23 20:02:27 2010 +0100
update to 1.09
.gitignore |3 ++-
perl-Apache-DBI.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Huh? KDE trunk (4.6) already uses XRandR backlight setting in PowerDevil:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/xrandrbrightness.cpp?revision=1194096&view=markup
> and it appears to work
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:39:02AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > They said that they install a Fedora for testing
> > purposes when it first comes out and enjoy the rapid pace of bugfixes as
> > they test the software in their environment. Then, t
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Huh? KDE trunk (4.6) already uses XRandR backlight setting in PowerDevil:
>>
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/xrandrbrightness.cpp?revision=1194096&view=
Heya!
I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
/var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
with the following accepted F15 feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var-run-tmpfs
My current tests indicate that we will not run into
On 11/23/10 12:16 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:39:02AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> They said that they install a Fedora for testing
>>> purposes when it first comes out and enjoy the rapid pace of bugfixes as
>>> they
On 11/23/2010 03:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one file/dir
> below /var/run which are supposed to be labelled differently. In
> this case the daemon can either be modified to fix its labels up
> itself, or a drop-in file in
On Tue, 23.11.10 21:19, Paul Howarth (p...@city-fan.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one file/dir
> > below /var/run which are supposed to be labelled differently. In
> > this case the daem
On Tue, 23.11.10 16:12, Doug Ledford (dledf...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 03:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> > /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> > with the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2010 04:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 21:19, Paul Howarth (p...@city-fan.org) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one
On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:32:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Also note that by now it's somewhat standard that code that needs to be
> run as part of early boot creates a subdir in /dev, such as /dev/.udev
> or /dev/.systemd. Not super-pretty, but I guess it's too late to
> complain about
On Tue, 23.11.10 22:44, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:32:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Also note that by now it's somewhat standard that code that needs to be
> > run as part of early boot creates a subdir in /dev, such as /dev/.udev
> > or /de
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
> on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>░
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656515
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=462466&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AH" == Adam Hough writes:
>
> AH> Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
> AH> openjpeg package in Fedora.
>
> It has two comaintainers, so I don't really see what the issue is.
>
> I went ahead a
On Tue, 23.11.10 13:41, Nicholas Miell (nmi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> > /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> > with the
On Tue, 23.11.10 23:02, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
> The release notes section contains this:
> | /var/run and /var/lock are now mounted from tmpfs, and hence emptied on
> | reboot. Applications must ensure to recreate their own files/dirs on
> | startup, and cannot rely that doing th
On 11/23/2010 02:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 13:41, Nicholas Miell (nmi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
>>> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on
On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a
> gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and
> Fedora 15. Items built with this could have undefined behavior, which
> could lead to data corruption.
>
> Un
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:45:26PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> gcc - update in -candidate, ping jakub
Just remove gcc from your list. gcc is bootstrapped, so
the installed gcc only builds first stage, everything else
is built by (one of the) newly built compiler(s).
So, gcc in f14 surely doesn'
On 11/23/2010 03:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
>> on
>> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
>> with the following accepted F15
On 11/23/10 3:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:45:26PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> gcc - update in -candidate, ping jakub
>
> Just remove gcc from your list. gcc is bootstrapped, so
> the installed gcc only builds first stage, everything else
> is built by (one of the)
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
I'm not going to be able to make this, I'll be on the road for
Thanksgiving.
- ajax
--
On Tue, 23.11.10 18:44, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> W dniu 23 listopada 2010 18:35 użytkownik philippe makowski
> napisał:
> > 2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> >> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> >> napisał:
> >>> We can create a list of all scr
On 11/23/2010 03:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what
> action could be or has been taken:
Please alphabetize such a list, always! _PLEASE_?
An alphabetized list is several times more effective at communication
because advanced readers
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
> action should be coordinated.
>
> Comments, thoughts?
I would certainly welcome any work in this direction!
I think it would make sense to use Johan
Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
>
> I'm not going to be able to make this,
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
> > MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> > MP> scripts?
> >
> > repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
>
> It seems to me that too little packages was returned
Add '/etc/rc.d/init.d/*' too; while they both resolve to
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I think the fact that we get less disks accesses (just think noatime and
> stuff for the files dropped there) is more interesting than using the
> absolute minimal amount of memory.
Less disk access at startup, or in general som
Jan Vcelak wrote:
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really long time. I
> have testing data with 56 entries (nodes) - exporting (slapcat) is quite
> fast,
> but importing (slapadd) takes around 10 seconds.
Hmm. I've seen selinux-policy-targeted take longer than this on
On 11/23/2010 07:36 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 19:13:09, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Another related thing is that Berkeley DB which openldap uses is
>> notoriously picky about getting updated. I'm fairly certain openldap does
>> not update their bundled BDB version to preven
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
