Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

Le Lun 15 novembre 2010 23:51, Karel Klic a écrit : > > Dne 15.11.2010 23:04, Matthew Garrett napsal(a): >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:01:30PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Garrett >>> wrote: >> Leaving the retracing at the user's end of things means that

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

Le Mar 16 novembre 2010 00:15, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a écrit : > > On 11/15/2010 09:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> Nobody has yet proven that LVM is a problem > > Well if you don't consider what Lennart mentioned [1] as a con against > usage of lvm by default The con was the assumption tha

rawhide report: 20101116 changes

Compose started at Tue Nov 16 08:15:09 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- apcupsd-3.14.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit) balsa-2.4.7-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit) beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.

Re: Mysterious Heisenbug involving pdflatex on Koji's F-13 build servers

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:23:01 +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: > > + ./run.sh > + tee testlog.txt > RUNNING TEST 1... > 0a1,269 >> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt fmtutil: running `pdftex -ini >> -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex - > translate-file=cp227.tcx *pdflatex.ini' ... ... > ...

Adding patches in a SPEC

I've never had to add a patch to a SPEC file before and I can't seem to make it work. The patch is to make a modification to the Makefile. I created the patch (diff -u) and put that in my SOURCES directory. I included the Patch0: line and then called the patch in %prep using %patch0 (no switches

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

You need to do patch on top of source tree container mycoolpkg-5.3/ /Makefile /source.c ... mycoolpkg-5.3.new/ /Makefile /source.c ... run diff -ruN -p mycoolpkg-5.3 mycoolpkg-5.3.new Another way: mycoolpkg-5.3/ /Makefile /Makefile.orig ... gendiff mycoolpkg-5.3 .orig > myc

sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi, http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :) Would be wonderful!

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > You need to do patch on top of source tree container > > mycoolpkg-5.3/ > /Makefile > /source.c > ... > mycoolpkg-5.3.new/ >/Makefile >/source.c > ... > > run diff -ruN -p mycoolpkg-5.3 mycoolpkg-5.3.new > ... and use

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >Hi, > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders >patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 >Can we have this patch back ported into the curren

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > I've never had to add a patch to a SPEC file before and I can't seem > to make it work. > > The patch is to make a modification to the Makefile.  I created the > patch (diff -u) and put that in my SOURCES directory.  I included th

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:04, Patrick MONNERAT wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> You need to do patch on top of source tree container >> >> mycoolpkg-5.3/ >>     /Makefile >>     /source.c >> ... >> mycoolpkg-5.3.new/ >>    /Makefile >>    /source.c >> ... >> >

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

> "IG" == Ilyes Gouta writes: IG> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for IG> Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :) IG> Would be wonderful! Would be more wonderful to wait until the upstream development has actually finished before cramming it into our package

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and > possibly posted as an update? :) > > Would be wonderful! > Try this, http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.35.8-59.xsched1/ i686 coming whenever mock fi

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi, According to phoronix, it would be queued for the 2.6.38 release. > actually works. If you really want it, Fedora provides all the tools to > build your own custom kernel package. It's already on my todo list :) -Ilyes On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Thanks Kyle for making it available! -Ilyes On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 > and > > possibly posted as an update? :) > > > > Would

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and >> possibly posted as an update? :) >> >> Would be wonderful! >> > > Try this, > http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 16:58, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders > patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2 > > Can we have this patch back ported into the current

Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

> Michel Alexandre Salim fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot >> continue his Fedora work anymore. Paul Howarth city-fan.org> writes: > Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his > packages: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pip

FESCo Election IRC Town Hall (2010-11-18 1500UTC)

Hi folks, Just announcing that there'll be an IRC town hall with the FESCo election candidates on Thursday, October 18th, at 1500UTC (1000 US/Eastern.) You can join #fedora-townhall-public to ask questions of the moderators, which will be posed and answered by the candidates in #fedora-townhall.

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote: > > Michel Alexandre Salim fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot > >> continue his Fedora work anymore. > > Paul Howarth city-fan.org> writes: > > Gérard already said he was amenable to other people t

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

Dne 16.11.2010 11:04, Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > Le Lun 15 novembre 2010 23:51, Karel Klic a écrit : >> Major advantage of the retrace server is that you can get a good >> backtraces even from unfresh coredumps. > > And why can't this be done with debuginfofs ? It's the same data. GDB pretty pri

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora devel was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 14 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 12 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 13 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010/11/16 Richard W.M. Jones : >> Paul Howarth city-fan.org> writes: >> > Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his >> > packages: >> > >> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-July/138375.html >> >> So does that mean that his packages can now be orphane

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora devel was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora 13 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora 14 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora 12 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora EPEL 6 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora devel was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 14 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 13 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 12 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora EPEL 6 was orphaned by tibbs To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 12 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 14 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora devel is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora devel is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

[Bug 548098] Fix dependency generator usage in all OCaml packages

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548098 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-11-16 13:27:58 EST --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Pac

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 14 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] ocaml ownership changed

Package ocaml in Fedora 13 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 13 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora 12 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgtk ownership changed

Package ocaml-lablgtk in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgtk ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes: RWMJ> I will take ocaml* and unison*. I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 548097] Fix OCaml packaging guidelines for new dependency generator

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548097 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-11-16 13:27:56 EST --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Pac

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:57:19 +0100, Karel Klic wrote: > Dne 16.11.2010 11:04, Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > > Le Lun 15 novembre 2010 23:51, Karel Klic a écrit : > >> Major advantage of the retrace server is that you can get a good > >> backtraces even from unfresh coredumps. > > > > And why can't t

[Bug 631112] FTBFS ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631112 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi Leenart, > Dhaval Giani pointed out to me that the same can be done from userspace > simply by creating a cgroup for each session in the cpu hierarchy. Turns So a session's (as you're referring) initiator to would be the terminal emulator process that has a virtual tty and systemd detect those

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes: > > RWMJ> I will take ocaml* and unison*. > > I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership. Done, thanks. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 09:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > This appears completely backwards to me. Attaching things like this to a > TTY is just wrong, because normally we don't have a single TTY around on > most graphical sessions. > > The kernel doesn't really have a notion of what a "session" is (onl

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic Updates policy #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > The kernel doesn't really have a notion of what a "session" is (only the > audit subsystem kinda has), but if this grouping behaviour is supposed > to be bound to a session, then attaching it to a TTY is a pretty shitty > replac

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

Hi Kyle, I'm getting these while running kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.35.8-59.xsched1/ [ 234.580039] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1701 [ 234.580048] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4272, n

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote: >> > Michel Alexandre Salim fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot >> >> continue his Fedora work anymore. >> >> Paul Howarth city-fan.org>

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 19:52, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi Leenart, > > > Dhaval Giani pointed out to me that the same can be done from userspace > > simply by creating a cgroup for each session in the cpu hierarchy. Turns > > So a session's (as you're referring) initiator to would

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, 16.11.10 11:02, Josh Stone (jist...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On 11/16/2010 09:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > This appears completely backwards to me. Attaching things like this to a > > TTY is just wrong, because normally we don't have a single TTY around on > > most graphical session

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:18 -0500, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:04, Patrick MONNERAT wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> You need to do patch on top of source tree container > >> > >> mycoolpkg-5.3/ > >> /Makefile > >>

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:35:49AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:16:41 -0400 > "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: > > > On 10/31/2010 03:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Okay, feedback time. > > > > > > Lately, there have been several attempts at urging proventesters > > > (and not

do we /really/ need to be shipping a 600~meg root-doc subpackage?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm seeing 15~ builds of this package in the past 2~ months. Each of those builds cranks out a 600~ meg doc subpackage. Is this really necessary? Does the docs change that much each release? Is it really worth trundling that data all over the place

Re: do we /really/ need to be shipping a 600~meg root-doc subpackage?

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:22:56 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: > I'm seeing 15~ builds of this package in the past 2~ months. Each of > those builds cranks out a 600~ meg doc subpackage. Is this really > necessary? Does the docs change that much each release? Is it really > worth trundling that data

Re: Adding patches in a SPEC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/16/2010 04:28 PM, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:18 -0500, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:04, Patrick MONNERAT wrote: >>> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: You need t

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester > > manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop > > denying that. I'd suggest n

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500 > Simo Sorce wrote: > >> Adam why should security updates wait at all ? >> Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ? >> Surely we can deal with such maintainer if that happens...

Re: do we /really/ need to be shipping a 600~meg root-doc subpackage?

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 03:13:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:22:56 -0800 > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > I'm seeing 15~ builds of this package in the past 2~ months. Each of > > those builds cranks out a 600~ meg doc subpackage. Is this really > > necessary? Does the docs

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 11:58 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 11/16/2010 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >>> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and >>> possibly posted as an update? :) >>> >>> Would be wonder

Re: Confused with budhi: my package is pushed to stable, but resides in updates-testing!?!

/*Kevin Fenzi */ wrote on 11/15/2010 8:22:04 PM +0350: On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:59:17 +0330 Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: As I've mentioned, this update is a simple rebuild and the current package in stable repositories is simply unusable as it crashes immediately. So, please push it to stable ASAP

NFS in rawhide

Hi, Quick question. I always had NFS starting on startup on a particular rawhide box. Today it didn't, and I notice that /etc/rc2|3.d/S390nfs was missing aswell. Did something remove these links and not replace them? Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Review swap: Ease, a GNOME presentation app

Ease, as recently covered in OMG Ubuntu: http:// www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/11/ease-clutter-presentation-app-linux-ubuntu/ is a slick-looking presentation app for GNOME, written in Vala and using Clutter for visual effects. I'm taking a slightly unusual approach to specifying BuildRequires:, spec

Re: Review swap: Ease, a GNOME presentation app

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim < sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > >Review ticket: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 > > > I will do the r

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:09:49PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > I am having these now :-( > Hi Gene, Looks like the author hasn't run with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP, as its a problem with the patch against 2.6.37-rc2 as well (it's doing kmalloc with irqs disabled.) I'll let you know if t

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

On 11/16/2010 08:34 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:09:49PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: >> I am having these now :-( >> > > Hi Gene, > > Looks like the author hasn't run with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP, as > its a problem with the patch against 2.6.37-rc2 as well (it's

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 23:35 +0100, François Cami wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500 > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > >> Adam why should security updates wait at all ? > >> Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are

Re: Looking for a good Radix tree (Patricia) library in fedora

Philip Prindeville wrote: > Not sure if the threading support is needed or not... plus it might mean > that it package only works on Linux (and not Win32, which Perl requires be > supported). >From the site: > threads and synchronization: cprops provides a pthread-like api. On unix > platforms the

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > which are these one ... > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi > > I will take ocaml* and unison*. > > Rich. I'm already comaintainer on clisp and ecl. I can take those if nobody else has a burning desire to do

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:38:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > #topic #496 F15Feature: ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/496 I have several conflicts with the FESCo meeting time tomorrow w

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

Ville Skyttä wrote: > I'd get rid of the versioned javadoc dir altogether, and simply install to > %{_javadocdir}/%{name}. Unversioned is good for bookmarking and javadoc > crosslinking. One thing you have to be careful of, no matter which way you decide, is that you MUST NOT change a directory

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

* Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 23:35 +0100, François Cami wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500 > > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > >> Adam why should security updates wait at all ? > > >> Do y

Re: Ubuntu moving towards Wayland

Matthias Clasen wrote: > GTK+ backends are linked in at this time. > One of the things that we will need to address before switching to > wayland-with-X-fallback-for-remote-or-poor-hw becomes a realistic > possibility. Well, I don't think that will ever be feasible for Qt apps (which, like it or

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * F12 critical path/update testing issues. (does it matter this close to > EOL?) Now Fedora n-1 is F13 and we're already seeing the same sort of issues there (e.g. the KDE 4.5.3 (non-critpath) bugfix update has karma 4 on F14 and 0 on F13). Kevin Kofler -- devel m

Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

Hi all, For those who do not know it yet, recent Fedora glibc updates include an optimized memcpy (which gets used on some processors) which breaks the 64 bit adobe flash plugin. The problem has been analyzed and is known, as well as a fix for it, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=