On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:14:12PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No. The issue is that in the past sometimes security updates have been
> rushed out with no testing and broken things badly. ;(
>
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Lessons
> For some small number of examples (yes, anyone is
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:19:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks for flagging this up.
>
> I'm wondering if perhaps we should devise a system - maybe a sub-group
> of proventesters - to ensure timely testing of security updates. wdyt?
I am not sure if a smaller group would help here. Bu
Compose started at Sat Nov 13 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.7-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.
Hello,
Le 21/10/2010 21:12, Roozbeh Pournader a écrit :
> pyfribidi
I take this one that childsplay depends on.
Regards,
Johan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/11/12 Kevin Fenzi :
> * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
> any luck).
>
For the record, you can check the current status here: [1]
Also, the tracker bug in GNOME bugzilla: [2]
Regards
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval
[2] https://bugzil
Hi all,
According to [1], my updated simspark package has been pushed to stable;
but it is not! The package is available in updates-testing. I wonder if
it is expected considering the new updating criteria or it is a bug.
Anyway, it is confusing. What's happening?
Finally a question: this updat
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:21:30AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> The documented issues do not seem to be as bad as a system being
> exploited. It is only about dependency breakage or services not working
> anymore. There is no major data corruption requiring access to backups
> and restoring the whole
On 11/12/2010 11:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Clyde E. Kunkel" writes:
>>
> The major packages that I work with have regression test suites,
> which in fact get run as part of the RPM build sequence. It's not
> apparent to me that I should need to invent some more tests.
>
I did not know that. G
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 18:07 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > * gnome3 / gnome-shell default
>
> And what about systems with hardware that does not support accelerated 3D?
There will be a fallback to gnome-panel, Metacity, and
notification-daemon
* The fallback componen
On 11/13/2010 10:45 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 18:07 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>>
>>> * gnome3 / gnome-shell default
>>
Does anyone happen to know how to mimic the equivalent of panel
applets esp those which are not a part of fedora
e.g. I use ma
/*Hedayat Vatankhah */ wrote on 11/13/2010
5:28:49 PM +0350:
Hi all,
According to [1], my updated simspark package has been pushed to
stable; but it is not! The package is available in updates-testing. I
wonder if it is expected considering the new updating criteria or it
is a bug. Anyway,
Le jeudi 11 novembre 2010 à 21:05 -0500, Ding Yi Chen a écrit :
> Well, actually input methods can do that. :-)
> They know exactly what language you are typing, and some do basic
> spelling check in the language they support.
Sorry, but no. Appart from the well known stability problems, which
m
/*Kevin Fenzi */ wrote on 11/12/2010 8:05:54 PM +0350:
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
Things I know of so far:
* systemd
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
* removing a bunch of suid stuff in favor of capab
Hi all,
I've read some months late the following announcement regarding genesis:
https://launchpad.net/genesis-sync/+announcement/5958
Genesis is now strictly linked to Ubuntu development deprecating the
system tray altogether and encouraging the use of application
indicators. Moreover the foc
Hi all,
I haven't had the time to even look at these packages and keep them up
to date, so I'm orphaning them. Please take them if they are important
to you :)
Many of these have either dead/slow upstreams, or I'm too dead/slow to
update them in time.
ezstream
gnome-gmail-notifier
irclog2html
lo
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 18:01, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> I despair of making *nix input people understand that LANGAGE ≠ INPUT
> Please stop trying to derive one from the other, they are *distinct* and
> one can (and often does) use a non-english layout to type English. It's
> about as smart as try
Hi,
I maintain LibRaw, which is only a static library -- upstream has
rejected the idea of maintaining dynamic libs since they would have to
take care of ABI compatibility across releases.
I wanted to know if there are any other only-static libraries out
there and how they maintainers manage rele
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:50:51 -0600,
Ian Weller wrote:
>
> lordsawar
I'll take this one, but help is welcome. It looks like it is uptodate
now and upstream had a release this past summer. I am also interested in
the topic.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:50:07 +0330
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
>
> /*Hedayat Vatankhah */ wrote on 11/13/2010
> 5:28:49 PM +0350:
> > Hi all,
> > According to [1], my updated simspark package has been pushed to
> > stable; but it is not! The package is available in updates-testing.
> > I wonde
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Boot the installer into rescue mode and run
> parted /dev/
>
> And in parted do:
> mklabel gpt
For VMs you can do:
guestfish -a /dev/ run : part-init gpt
(which destroys any data on /dev/), and then proceed
with virt-install/what
Hi Siddhesh,
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:56:47 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> I wanted to know if there are any other only-static libraries out there
> and how they maintainers manage releases. I had packaged this to build
> Shotwell 0.6.x but I understand there are a couple of other apps too
> th
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:26:48PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> *DE could consider switching the default to use EXT4 directly without
> LVM. [1]
> 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoDefaultLVM
The "Detailed Description" seems contradictory:
| LVM provides very little benefit
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:09:35 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
> specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
> patches upstream in grub2 I have no intention of making it the default
> in Fedora. Thanks,
>
That
Hello packagers,
As djvulibre is (optionally, build-time choice) required by apvlv,
which I am currently packaging ( http://pcarrier.fedorapeople.org/wip/apvlv/ ),
I am taking ownership of the package in EPEL4,5,6.
No bug reports related to EPEL ATM.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Carrier
--
devel mailin
Hello packagers,
Taking ownership of sos in Fedora*.
It appeared in EPEL4-5 in pkgdb. Retired as sos is part of the default
install of RHEL 4.5- (sysreport), RHEL4.6+ (sosreport) and RHEL5
(sosreport) anyway.
My signature should explain why I care about this package :)
Cheers,
--
Pierre Carr
On Sat, 13.11.10 23:41, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:26:48PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > *DE could consider switching the default to use EXT4 directly without
> > LVM. [1]
> > 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoDefaultLVM
>
Hello Fedora Devel List,
Im a newcomer with mock and rpmbuild.
How can I rebuild el6 packages such as Redhat?
My idea would be
yum install mock
useradd mockbuild
usermod -G mock mockbuild
mock rebuild -r epel-6-x86_64 /home/mockbuild/kernel-2.6.32-71.7.1.el6.src.rpm
Is that right? Should I us
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 01:14 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> LVM actually slows down boot considerably. Not primarily because its
> code was slow or anything, but simply because it isn't really written in
> the way that things are expected to work these days.
This is true and all. But it's easi
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know how to keep track of which package lists
> something as a *build* requirement? repoquery has --whatrequires and
> --tree-whatrequires, and has an --srpm option that seems promising, but
> does not seem to do the trick.
Thanks to http:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 10:56 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 01:14 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > LVM actually slows down boot considerably. Not primarily because its
> > code was slow or anything, but simply because it isn't really written in
> > the way that things are e
On 11/14/2010 12:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:26:48PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> *DE could consider switching the default to use EXT4 directly without
>> LVM. [1]
>> 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoDefaultLVM
>
> The "Detailed Description"
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
> Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
biosdevname installed by default, used in the installer and at runtime
to rename Dell and HP server onboa
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:50:51PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I haven't had the time to even look at these packages and keep them up
> to date, so I'm orphaning them. Please take them if they are important
> to you :)
>
> Many of these have either dead/slow upstreams, or I'm too dead/
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:02:28PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> Heyyas. I actually gave boot.fedoraproject.org a testrun and i
> realized that by default a repository called "installation" is
> selected with a static repo url. instead i have actually figured that
> selecting the usual standard fedo
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:37:19PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:50:51PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I haven't had the time to even look at these packages and keep them up
> > to date, so I'm orphaning them. Please take them if they are important
> > to yo
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:34:54PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
> > Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
>
> biosdevname installed by defau
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 14:22 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:21:30AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > The documented issues do not seem to be as bad as a system being
> > exploited. It is only about dependency breakage or services not working
> > anymore. There is no major d
On 11/13/2010 06:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> biosdevname installed by default, used in the installer and at runtime
> to rename Dell and HP server onboard NICs from non-deterministic
> "ethX" to clearly labeled "lomX" matching the chassis silkscreen.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=1288925
38 matches
Mail list logo
