On 11/02/2010 05:11 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging guidelines. We
>> would welcome wider discussion/comments at this point. From our point of
>> view guidelines seem ready for approval by
Compose started at Wed Nov 3 08:15:18 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.
People present:
* orionp
* cspike
* hannes
* sochotni
* mbooth
* ggraz
* tibbs
Overview:
* Maven 3 status
* Maven 3 vanilla package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945
* Custom resolver based on resolver for m2
* http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/0003-
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:12 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
> week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api
> changes that will require minor adjustment of all users. And there's
> quite a few of them (see
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
is missing dist-f14-build-current ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://et.redhat.com/~rj
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.07-1.el5' was created pointing to:
505f548... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Dependency on perl-libwww-perl missing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649372
Summary: Dependency on perl-libwww-perl missing
Product: Fe
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.07-1.el4' was created pointing to:
505f548... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:45:48 +0300, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> Hi!
> %{_libdir}/girepositry-1.0/ is not owned by any package. It is used,
> i.e., in DeviceKit-power-devel. Dmitrij.
On F-14 it's owned by multiple packages:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/
atk-1.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64
gdk-pi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2010-11-03
12:33:25 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of lif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2010 09:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
>
> is missing dist-f14-build-current ...
>
> Rich.
>
This path is deprecated.
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-f14-build/latest/
Koji
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
> the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
Thanks for considering it.
> But keep those comments coming, we'll try to keep working on the
> guidelines to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-debuginfo is empty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649418
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-debuginfo is empty
Product
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:45:16 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
> >
> > NOTE: Matthew G
Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
with callgraph information.
Soeren's comment from March:
http://lwn.net/Articles/380582/
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
> system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
> with callgraph information.
>
> Soeren's comment from March:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567282
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457550&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457550&action=diff
Description: Simple Paged Results search keeps the connection
per paging, but not an operation. When an abandon r
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> 3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK packages
> should be purged. It's a relic from times that are long gone,
Having a semi-sane way to install multi-vendor multi-version JVMs is
still needed EPEL
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
> > system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
> > with callgraph information.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:20:59PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Instead of this, which really is a big performance penalty.
>
> Do you have a sense of the quantification of
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
> > the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
>
> Thanks for considering it.
>
> > But keep t
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > 3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK
> > packages should be purged. It's a relic from times that are long gone,
>
> Having a semi-sane way to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2010-11-03
15:28:44 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of lif
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > > 3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK
> > > packages should be purged.
On 11/03/2010 11:48 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
> system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
> with callgraph information.
I am the author of tsprof, http://bitwagon.com/tsprof/tsprof.html .
Eight years
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
> > changed ... with default compilation options, getting callgraph
> > profiling on x86_64 really requires
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:10:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
> > > changed ... with default compilat
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > > > 3) In my opinion, the whole alternati
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
Sandro Janke changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hi!
This is something I got in my mail box today.
As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for me?
cheers, Bert
the url of the blog of the guy: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/
== the mail ==
Dear Fedoracommunity,
Over the course of the day I recieved 22^3 mails
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:11 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:10:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > > Basically summarizes the situation, and as f
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 20:29 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > It seems like if it was that easy, it would have happened and we'd have
> > a solution in the upstream kernel...
>
> I think we had one in the upstream kernel for some time, then Linus just
> didn't like to see it needing too many bugfix
On 11/03/2010 01:51 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> [ But yes, 4% is a big hit. 1% I would accept without hesitation.
> 4% does make me hesitate a little bit. During devel cycles, we
> accept much more slowdown than that for the debug kernel,
> of course. If we can figure out profiling without fram
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27
> Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 201
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
> say? (and on this subject, I don't t
> On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> > managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> > not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
> > say? (and on this subject,
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:35 -0700, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> > managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> > not even be used with the top R
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 23:54 +0200, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
> > On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> > > managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> > > not even be used w
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Bert Desmet wrote:
> hi!
>
> This is something I got in my mail box today.
> As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for me?
>
> cheers, Bert
>
> the url of the blog of the guy: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/
>
> == the mail ==
>
> De
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
I disagree. I have seen many bugs fixed with the aid of abrt
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
>> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
>> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
>> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> >> that it is a great idea for commercial pro
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> >
>> >> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to F
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> >
>
On 11/04/2010 03:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>>
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I thi
On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
> Orcan
Of the 28 abrt bugs filed against my packages, I think 1 resulted
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> > that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> > obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
> > Orcan
On 11/03/2010 11:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
>>> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
Just a followup thought... I wonder if abrt could be made smarter /
changed to allow for a preference setting to report on updates-testing
or all updates... I know awhile back I made suggestions on what it would
take in my mind to increase user testing [1]. I see abrt as another way
to help increas
2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil :
> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
No need to discuss - it's really useful. I recently closed several
issues with the aid of s
Hi.
I'm now building NearTree package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047
As I've commented at #23,
%check (This means "make tests") failed only on i686 (for EL6, f12 and f13).
I can build NearTree on x86_64, ppc64, and ppc (for f12) with no error.
All of EL6, f12, and f13 use gc
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I
> guess what I'm asking is what actual harm/damage are these reports
> causing, beyond the time it takes to look at the report and figure out
> whether you can fix it? Why is the fact that people have experienced
> crashes you haven't yet f
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 02:15 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I
> > guess what I'm asking is what actual harm/damage are these reports
> > causing, beyond the time it takes to look at the report and figure out
> > whether you can fix it? Why is
On 11/04/2010 07:15 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I
>> guess what I'm asking is what actual harm/damage are these reports
>> causing, beyond the time it takes to look at the report and figure out
>> whether you can fix it? Why is the fact that
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 07:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > The question is
> > Am I using the time efficiently? OR
> > Are the these tools actually preventing me to be efficient during my
> > available time?
> As a user wanting to report a bug, abrt is both.
>
> On one hand it's a systematic w
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 02:15 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > I
>> > guess what I'm asking is what actual harm/damage are these reports
>> > causing, beyond the time it takes to look at
57 matches
Mail list logo
