On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:37:38 +0100, Kevin wrote:
> Martin Stransky wrote:
> > there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to
> > stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it
> > fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability
> > (https://bugzilla.mozi
Compose started at Sun Oct 31 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.
Hi,
mod_python project is officially dead since june, it had no release
since february 2007. You should move to mod_wsgi which a community
supported alternative for python web applications.
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modpython-project-is-now-officially.html
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/05/m
On Sunday 31 October 2010 02:58:21 Dominic Hopf wrote:
> I think it's likely something like a "BuildRequires: fltk" already
> should be enough. I'd suggest to just try out that and see what
> happens. :)
Most probably it should be
BuildRequires: fltk-devel
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
d
lör 2010-10-30 klockan 17:05 -0400 skrev Eric "Sparks" Christensen:
> The source is a single file with no readme and I'm
> not exactly sure how to package the software.
Probably:
cc -o foo foo.c $(fltk-config --cflags --ldflags)
/abo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
Haïkel Guémar
gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> mod_python project is officially dead
since june, it had no release
> since february 2007. You should move
to mod_wsgi which a community
> supported alternative for python web
applications.
>
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modp
ython-project-i
On 10/31/2010 03:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:37:38 +0100, Kevin wrote:
>
>> Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to
>>> stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it
>>> fixes a public cr
"Eric \"Sparks\" Christensen" wrote:
> The source I downloaded contained a single file so I'm not sure what
> needs to happen.
Well, since asking upstream for a copy of the license to ship is
required for the guidelines, maybe a simple Makefile could be asked for
as well.
--Ben
--
devel mailin
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:13 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I have been trying to get system processes to stop using /tmp for years.
>
> http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/11467.html
>
> As some one who lives with polyinstatiated namespace /tmp, The only
> problem I know of now is handing of kerbero
I'm the CPAN owner of Net::Patricia (perl-Net-Patricia.rpm) and it currently
supports IPv4 and IPv6.
Both are done with specialized data structures.
I'm looking for something that handles a more generic binary data blob... so
that I could have arbitrary searches.
For instance, in Perl, I could
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Martin Stransky wrote:
> > there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to
> > stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it
> > fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability
> > (https://bugzilla
Adam Williamson píše v Ne 31. 10. 2010 v 18:06 -0700:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Yet another blatant example of
> > failure of the Update Acceptance Criteria, needlessly exposing our users to
> > critical vulnerabilities.
>
> Kevin, could you *please* not word th
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I already wrote this to -test a couple of days ago:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/095135.html
>
> and we're discussing it there. I think the thread demonstrates things
> tend to go much more constructively if you avoid throwing words like
- lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote:
> I intend to take ownership of haddock package. It is required for one other
> package (leksah, an IDE for Haskell) that I am planning to submit.
Yes, I think that is fine.
You will need to submit haddock for package review since it has been retired
14 matches
Mail list logo
