Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik, 19:15:16) * AGREED: the feature is approved. (nirik, 19:26:46) This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed. The documentation and guidel

Heads Up - New Firefox update

Hi, there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222). Bodhi links: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed.  The documentation and > guidelines are very incomplete.  How does one figure out which file > capabilities are needed by the programs I maintain that currently use setuid?  > He

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

Le Mer 27 octobre 2010 21:33, Laurent Rineau a écrit : > Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 18:32:29, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : >> > "MP" == Michał Piotrowski writes: >> MP> Where is the link to the wiki? It's in page footer. >> >> Actually it's right at the top; click "Contributors". (I can't

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

2010/10/28 Rahul Sundaram : >  On 10/28/2010 03:27 AM, Benjamín Valero Espinosa wrote: >> 2010/10/27 Michał Piotrowski >> >>     2010/10/27 Matthew Miller >>     > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:49:14PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>     >> Someone should fix this ugly font - looks bad in Vista...

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

On 10/28/2010 04:51 PM, Arnoldas S. wrote: Isn't Hulk the copyrighted trademark? "coprighted trademark" is not correct usage. It might be a trademark. Does not prevent fair use. Legal questions should be directed to legal AT fedoraproject.org Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Orphaning packages

appframework -- Swing Application Framework beansbinding -- Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation bindex -- Bundle Manifest Header Mapper bytelist -- A java library for lists of bytes cobertura -- Java tool for calculating the test coverage felix-framework -- Apache Felix Framework felix

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2010 04:14 AM, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed. The documentation and >> guidelines are very incomplete. How does one figure

Re: Space for public package git repositories

Tim Niemueller wrote: > Recently I wanted to modify a package. Since we now use git for > packages, the following work flow feels natural: > > git clone package-repo > make changes in package repo > commit > push repo somewhere > send pull request to package maintainer > > Is that the anticipated w

[Bug 647503] New: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647503 Summary: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27 Product

Re: experimental systemd + initscripts repo

Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > > Fixed in git, thanks for the report. > > BTW: A nice way to make activation of services conditional based on > existance of a file is the relatively new ConditionPathExists= setting > in [Unit]. If the file listed there doesn't exist, then the u

Re: Space for public package git repositories

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Tim Niemueller wrote: > Incidentally, if you'd like to see an updated git for EL-5, point > anyone you know that uses emacs-git my way. AFAIK, the only hang up > to updating EPEL to git-1.7 is working out how to maintain the emacs > suppor

F-14 Branched report: 20101028 changes

Compose started at Thu Oct 28 13:15:57 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit) Broken deps for i386 -- qtgpsc-0.2.

Re: Space for public package git repositories

yersinia wrote: > Beware also that git 1.7 by default enforce that it is not possible > to push to a repository git "not bare", and, from my experience, > many EPEL users don't haven't read the advice on this of the git > manual - just an example of another possible "incompatibility" Yep, but that

Re: Building boo against mono-2.8 problem

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:50:24 +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > In order to build the latest version of boo (the current one in the > repos won't build against mono-2.8), the old version of boo has to be > removed as there is a conflict with Boo.Lang.Extensions in gac (it is a > known bug wh

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID ( > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik, > 19:15:16) > * AGREED: the feature is approved. (nirik, 19:26:46) > > > Th

Re: Building boo against mono-2.8 problem

Hi, > > Is it possible to build boo on koji without removing the old version or > > is there a way to just remove Boo.Lang.Extensions from the gac? > > > Not sure how this is a problem. Boo.Lang.Extensions.dll is only shipped > by the boo package, right? And rebuilding boo does *not* pull in the

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID ( >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik, >> 19:15:16) >> * A

F-14 updates hosed?

Not sure if I'm imagining things, but it looks as if those have been hosed. For example: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/14/x86_64/ Any ideas? -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-14 updates hosed?

Maybe it is to get populated after the release of Fedora 14? On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Not sure if I'm imagining things, but it looks as if those have been > hosed. For example: > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/14/x86_64/ > > Any ideas?

Re: F-14 updates hosed?

Jose Manimala fedoraproject.org> writes: > Maybe it is to get populated after the release of Fedora 14? Don't think so. These directories get populated as updates are released, after the creation of the branch. They had files in them just yesterday. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: F-14 updates hosed?

oh ok... then I am on the wrong page... sorry :) On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Jose Manimala fedoraproject.org> writes: > >> Maybe it is to get populated after the release of Fedora 14? > > Don't think so. These directories get populated as updates are released, after >

Re: Default partitioning

Hello Stephen, On a default Fedora installation using encryption and LVM it partitioned a 50GB drive giving 44GB to the root partition and only 4GB to /home. In most environments saving things to the root partition is avoided and it seems there is more than enough room for applications. This is t

RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

> "JN" == Joe Nall writes: JN> On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> More to the point, I can easily see the setuid bit easily on a >> binary. >> How do I tell if these strange/hidden "capabilities" are >> present on a binary? 'ls' doesn't mention anything. JN> getcap