On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:49:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> You can reproduce the bug like this:
> curl -o iputils-20071127-10.fc13.x86_64.rpm --range 1384-1400
> ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/Fedora/x86_64/os/Packages/iputils-20071127-10.fc13
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:49:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > You can reproduce the bug like this:
> > curl -o iputils-20071127-10.fc13.x86_64.rpm --range 1384-1400
> > ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:43:22PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen píše v ??t 07. 10. 2010 v 22:29 +0300:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:17:11AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 10:49 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >
> > > > > that bug is already inconvenient
Compose started at Sun Oct 17 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
0:1.3.0
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
How can Fedora work out of the box with apps requiring env variables like
JAVA_HOME, M2_HOME ?
Today, even though fedora provides java & maven, one still has to manually
set these vars. Should Fedora java/maven packages set these (e.g. by files
in /etc/profile.d/), while still allowing users to ov
Compose started at Sun Oct 17 13:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
gnome-pilot-conduits-2.0.17-4.fc13.x86_64 requires
libgpilotdconduit.so.2()(64bit)
John Poelstra writes:
> Hello Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Owners (all copied on this message),
>
> The list of bugs below are currently blocking the final release of
> Fedora 14. Updates fixing these bugs MUST be ready on Monday, 2010-10-18
> (Final Change Deadline) or Release Engineering will be una
13.10.2010 03:07, Jesse Keating пишет:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/8/10 7:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
>> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
>> differences.
>>
>> After made some changes in origin/master and
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 20:36 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> I want fill it, but bugzilla even do not contain such component as
> fedpkg. Why?
$ rpm -q --qf '%{SOURCERPM}\n' fedpkg
fedora-packager-0.5.1.4-5.fc13.src.rpm
So the component to file bugs is "fedora-packager".
--
M
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:21:11PM +0300, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> How can Fedora work out of the box with apps requiring env variables like
> JAVA_HOME, M2_HOME ?
>
> Today, even though fedora provides java & maven, one still has to manually
> set these vars. Should Fedora java/maven packages se
In the attachment a few patches which were not included in the Fedora
yet. I don't remember for which version they are and what usefulness
of them, but just in case I send them to you.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> python-alsa is taken by 'cheeselee'
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010
Has anyone worked on packaging Java3D for Fedora? Or is there any
reason that it wouldn't be acceptable for inclusion in Fedora?
I haven't really looked into packaging Java3D yet, but I want to package
ReplicatorG, which is used to control 3D printers such as the MakerBot
and RepRap, and it
Start End Name
Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Final Change Deadline
Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Final Blocker Meeting (f14blocker)--Blocks RC
Compose
Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final RC Compose
Tue 02-Nov Tue 02-Nov Final (GA) Release
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
W dniu 17.10.2010 23:19, John Poelstra pisze:
> Start End Name
> Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Final Change Deadline
> Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Final Blocker Meeting (f14blocker)--Blocks RC
> Compose
> Mon 18-Oct Mon 18-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final RC Compose
> Tue 02-Nov Tue 02
OK! I will look into them.
Robin
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> In the attachment a few patches which were not included in the Fedora
> yet. I don't remember for which version they are and what usefulness
> of them, but just in case I send them to you.
>
> On Sun, Oct
Did you send the patches upstream?
Robin
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> In the attachment a few patches which were not included in the Fedora
> yet. I don't remember for which version they are and what usefulness
> of them, but just in case I send them to you.
>
> On S
On 10/16/2010 06:51 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Looks cool at first glance. Does Redhat plan do similar service on it?
It will be cool if it became available for Fedora also, not just RHEL. I
think it requires cloud to function as public service and it very hard
to do so in com
On 10/16/2010 09:27 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 10:54 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 11:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Right, but I'm saying that the "Design Suite" group might be more
>>> appropriate in all cases.
>>
>> Do you mean getting rid of the "G
18 matches
Mail list logo