On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:14:28 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:45:11 +0200
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >
> > Ok - that's one problem - we sucks in selective updates and
> > information for users.
> >
> > Other could be - change release scheme:
> > 1. very similar to current one - r
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Brandon Lozza wrote:
>
>> It seems like the policy would kill the use of an upgraded KDE (4.5 to
>> 4.6) because KDE almost always makes UI changes.
>
> The kde-sig asked FESCo to consider up to 1 KDE version upgrade per release,
> and this was
If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
have been hit by:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
and a lot of manual intervention.
A simple "does it boot" test in fact wouldn't have
Hi,
I keep getting the same error trying to build fldigi on rawhide x64 but
not on rawhide i686 I don't know what to do to fix it. Attached is the
koji build report[1].
I've successfully built the package locally using mock for rawhide on
i686 but for some reason the koji build fails on x64 an
Rex Dieter writes:
[...]
>> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:17:23 +0200
>> Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>>
>>> Brandon Lozza writes:
>
>>> > Most of us KDE users want deliberate visible changes to the user.
>>> > That's the point in having the latest version.
>>>
>>> Sorry if this has been already answered
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:07:02 +0200 Marek Kasik wrote:
> I plan to update update poppler in rawhide (Fedora 15) to new
> development version 0.15 next week (at Monday, October 4th). Changes
> against 0.14.x are:
> [...]
> Please check whether your package builds against this new version of
> poppler
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
> have been hit by:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
> which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
> and a lot of m
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Why do you think it's a good idea to except netbooks?
>
> The netbook issue can be solved by a simple "Download Netbook Version" link
> (along with a clear warning on the default download that it's only for
> desktop/
Compose started at Wed Sep 29 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libgs.so.8
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64
There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly
incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration
and so on, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634596#c3
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_4_for_developers
https://developer.mozill
Gary Morris wrote:
>
> ok.. it pulled 389-ds-base-1.2.6-2.fc13.x86_64.. is that ok or do i
> need to be on 1.2.6-1? On 1.2.6-2 I'm having the same problem. As
> soon as I start an application that is ldap intensive, the directory
> server crashes real quick. No errors of any sort reported.
No
On 09/27/2010 01:23 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>
> i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
> majority of hw someone will happen to have.
>
Why not use the browser user agent to recomend the best option to the
user for the machine being used to download it?, with some way to w
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
>have been hit by:
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
>which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
>and a lot of manual intervention.
>
>A simple "
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
> have been hit by:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
> which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
> and a lot o
Compose started at Wed Sep 29 13:15:24 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
> have been hit by:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
> which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
> and a lot o
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:57:11 -0400,
James Laska wrote:
>
> In fairness, reboot was tested by a proventester for this update. The
> bug doesn't surface on reboot alone. The problem happens after prelink
> has run ... then you're hosed.
You still had a chance if you didn't reboot. rpm st
2010/9/29 Martin Stransky :
> There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly
> incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration
> and so on, see:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634596#c3
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_4_fo
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 à 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a
écrit :
> If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
> have been hit by:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
> which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
Just a quick reminder that X Test Week continues today with Radeon Test
Day - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-29_Radeon . Please
do come along and help us test. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://
I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
take a look at my statistics.
First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
Most bugs filed in a day: 7
7 2008-03
> /usr/bin/ld: fldigi-trx.o: 'thread_id_' accessed both as normal and
> thread local symbol
> fldigi-trx.o: could not read symbols: File format not recognized
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [fldigi] Error 1
Use 'eu-readelf -s foo.o | fgrep thread_id_' on each .o that goes int
Greetings,
This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.co
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:34:13 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Brandon Lozza wrote:
> >
> >> It seems like the policy would kill the use of an upgraded KDE
> >> (4.5 to 4.6) because KDE almost always makes UI changes.
> >
> > The kde-sig asked FE
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Again, you're extrapolating way too far from a single problem case. The
> problem is simply that we have the xorg-x11-drivers metapackage which
> requires every single X driver and is in the critpath. There's various
> ways we could adjust this so it's no longer the case. I
On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Gary Morris wrote:
ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. /
[r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389
389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.x86_64
389-admin-console-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch
389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc13.x86_64
389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64
389-d
Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Is poppler_page_get_selected_text() the correct replacement for the old
> poppler_page_get_text() ?
Yes, but you also need to change the y coordinates, see:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/?id=b257428150e2c13dcc24fd8f75e4ee2c679ab414
Kevin Kofler
sure.. i'll do that and rerun them..
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Gary Morris wrote:
>>
>>> ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. /
>>>
>>> [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389
>>> 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.
When: Friday, 2010-10-01 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
After a short break from getting the Beta release out the door, it is
now time to start focusing on bugs that could block the final release.
We can ship the final release of Fedora 14 on time if we rem
Could you do "thread apply all bt", once you see this Segmentation
fault message?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fe4a23e9710 (LWP 9557)]
0x7fe4d1fc601c in attrlist_find_or_create_locking_optional () from
/usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
(gdb) t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2010 01:10 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
> take a look at my statistics.
>
> First bug
commit 1b263497210129600a54978af0a347ca5903688e
Author: Jesse Keating
Date: Wed Sep 29 14:06:59 2010 -0700
- Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757
dspam.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 5b50f55..cbfa50c 100644
--- a/ds
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 4:15:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Today it's this package. Tomorrow it'll be another one. Sure we can solve
> this particular problem (but it's taking WEEKS!), but why would that be the
> only one?
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmxyj6iInMc
Now that the pro
On Wednesday, 29 September 2010 at 18:29, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/9/29 Martin Stransky :
> > There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly
> > incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration
> > and so on, see:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On 29 September 2010 21:07, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Currently, it's 4.5.1.
>
> So, if we release with that, and then 4.6 comes out and changes the
> user experence, we would need to see about granting an exception to
> push that version in F14.
>
> Speaking for myself, etc.
>
This fedora kde user th
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:01 +0200,
> Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>
>> - Avoid changing the user experence if at all possible. - this is too
>> strong condition. In some cases fixing a bug might inevitable change the
>> user experience and in s
Hi Chen,
For modules/libimg/png, mozilla products use aPNG which was rejected
by upstream.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG
So we have to use internal png.
For media/libvorbis, mozilla has custom patches in the source tree.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517422
Fro media/libvpx
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Takanori MATSUURA wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> For modules/libimg/png, mozilla products use aPNG which was rejected
> by upstream.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG
>
> So we have to use internal png.
>
> For media/libvorbis, mozilla has custom patches in the source tr
Graphics Test Week moves into its final stretch today / tomorrow
(depending where you are!) with Intel graphics Test Day -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-30_Intel . As with the
others, this event runs all day in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC, and
testing instructions and live im
39 matches
Mail list logo
