On 09/16/2010 09:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> (I don't have a strong opinion on whether the data format is RPM or
> repodata myself; maybe just a slight preference for the latter; the
> most important thing in my mind is to come to rough consensus and
> working code, and actually ship something)
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 20:10 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > If you download either of these versions from koji and try to install
> > them, you get a deps issue with gnome-panel, as it requires
> > libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit).
>
>
On 09/17/2010 09:37 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 15:13 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit :
>> On 09/14/2010 12:18 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>> You'll need at least some open ports. 443 and 80 I think are the only
>>> ones required for koji builds.
>> and exactly those a
Hello.
16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
> against F15?
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
>
If we in dialogue in update may be continue in one place is good decision?
--
devel mai
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00:
> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
>> against F15?
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
>>
> Please excuse m
On 17 September 2010 08:01, FlorianFesti wrote:
> Can someone please elaborate a bit what pieces of information are really
> needed? The .desktop files as a whole?
Information we use in app-install:
TABLE translations:
STRING application_id Name of the desktop file, with no extension)
STRING app
17.09.2010 12:56, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00:
>> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
>>> against F15?
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/I
Any help here? I'm still stuck.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/16/2010 07:21 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I get:
>
>> fedpkg switch-branch f13
> Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
>
>> git merge master
> CONFLICT
I've pushed an update to f14 testing for igraph. Now I need to update
python-igraph.
DEBUG util.py:255: No Package Found for igraph-devel = 0.5.4
What is the procedure to make igraph-0.5.4 available so I can build python-
igraph-0.5.4 which needs it? I've forgotten, and a quick search of
htt
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've pushed an update to f14 testing for igraph. Now I need to update
> python-igraph.
>
> DEBUG util.py:255: No Package Found for igraph-devel = 0.5.4
>
> What is the procedure to make igraph-0.5.4 available so I can build python-
> igraph-0
Compose started at Fri Sep 17 08:15:18 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ale-0.9.0.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libMagickCore.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-p
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:01 AM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> (I don't have a strong opinion on whether the data format is RPM or
>> repodata myself; maybe just a slight preference for the latter; the
>> most important thing in my mind is to come to rough
17.09.2010 12:56, Mamoru Tasaka пишет:
> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00:
>> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
>>> against F15?
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/I
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:11:37AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> I know, systemd got reverted for F-14. But unless I missed something,
> the plan is/was to keep it the default for F-15, and in rawhide. This
> means the package dependencies need to be different in rawhide please.
Ditto.
At least thi
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:39 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> That said, it is still extremely late for F-14 consideration.
> Those interested in seeing this driver in some later F-14 kernel
> update or in F-15 or beyond are strongly encouraged to take-up
> this driver's cause in getting it migrated
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:53 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:34 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jon Masters
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > Well, the US law of the land says that you can't listen in on
>
Arthur Pemberton (pem...@gmail.com) said:
> > Can someone please elaborate a bit what pieces of information are really
> > needed? The .desktop files as a whole?
>
> Wouldn't that require the tool to download every package just to get
> the embedded information.
Not if it's provided in the RPM h
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
> > I know, systemd got reverted for F-14. But unless I missed something,
> > the plan is/was to keep it the default for F-15, and in rawhide. This
> > means the package dependencies need to be different in rawhide please.
>
> Ditto.
Will be fixed shortly
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:21:02 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I
> get:
>
>> fedpkg switch-branch f13
> Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
>
>> git merge master
> CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename .cvsigno
16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
> against F15?
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
>
Please excuse me what I did not ask early. Now I call to maintainers of
dependent packages - ple
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:10 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
> > against F15?
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
> >
> Pleas
On 17 September 2010 13:36, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> Wouldn't that require the tool to download every package just to get
> the embedded information.
Yes, that's what my generator tool does. Of course, it only downloads
the packages that contain .desktop files (which we can tell from the
metadat
Compose started at Fri Sep 17 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1
On 17 September 2010 15:28, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Not if it's provided in the RPM header in a way where it can be easily
> stuffed into the metadata or a similar place.
Bear in mind: 'n' applications per package, where 'n' can be a large
number. This means you have to come up with an interesti
On 09/17/2010 05:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 13:36, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Wouldn't that require the tool to download every package just to get
>> the embedded information.
> Yes, that's what my generator tool does. Of course, it only downloads
> the packages that con
On 09/17/2010 02:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
>> against F15?
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
>>
> Please excuse me what
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) (fo...@hubbitus.com.ru) said:
> 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
> > against F15?
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
> >
> Please excuse me
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 10:26 PM +9:00:
> 17.09.2010 12:56, Mamoru Tasaka пишет:
>> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00:
>>>16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issu
On 17 September 2010 16:39, FlorianFesti wrote:
> open the payload and unpack the content of the desktop files...
I got told by infrastructure this would take too much bandwidth and
too much time to do on each compose. Apparently the link between the
machine doing the compose and the mirror is sl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
desktop-i386-20100916.15.iso fails to boot from cd on dell dimension
2350. Does it work for other folks?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMk7CjL6j7milTFsERAhItAJ0Tx+fLkRQwUFcwOtsObwsQIscN1QCcDfeJ
pSAP+UAIGMv6qwZO
While upstart is still in the repo, the initscripts package now pulls
in systemd and systemd-sysvinit.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:17:19 -0700,
Carl Byington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> desktop-i386-20100916.15.iso fails to boot from cd on dell dimension
> 2350. Does it work for other folks?
Do you have some more symptoms you can tell us? I did a local compose fr
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:23:27 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:17:19 -0700,
> Carl Byington wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > desktop-i386-20100916.15.iso fails to boot from cd on dell dimension
> > 2350. Does it work for other
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 14:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> While upstart is still in the repo, the initscripts package now pulls
> in systemd and systemd-sysvinit.
Hey, thanks Bill.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 15:28, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Not if it's provided in the RPM header in a way where it can be easily
>> stuffed into the metadata or a similar place.
>
> Bear in mind: 'n' applications per package, where 'n' can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > > desktop-i386-20100916.15.iso fails to boot from cd on dell
> dimension
> > > 2350. Does it work for other folks?
> >
> > Do you have some more symptoms you can tell us? I did a local
> compose from
> > around the same time and it worked on a USB
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:37 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 16:39, FlorianFesti wrote:
> > open the payload and unpack the content of the desktop files...
>
> I got told by infrastructure this would take too much bandwidth and
> too much time to do on each compose.
It takes
Hi,
What are the current plans for SystemD in F14? Systemd is still listed
as F14 feature. Will it be developed in F14 or in external repo as
Rahul Sundaram suggested?
Regards,
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Beta RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Hi fedora-devel,
I would like to contribute a piece of bash code that handles url in
gnome for ssh and telnet schemas. The idea being that whenever a user
clicks a link the proper client opens up in the default terminal
window configured in the user's "Preferred Applications" dialog.
examples of l
41 matches
Mail list logo
