Greetings Testers,
Anaconda Translation&Keyboard Test Day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
This day will mainly focus on the translation and keyboard in different
languages during installation. Test cases have been well prepared on the
wiki page with the he
Toshio Kuratomi wrote on 15.09.2010 04:54:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:02:33PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400
>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> > Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted,
>> > even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, syst
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:05:34AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> So, we closed all blocker bugs, we worked through the vast majority of
>> other bugs. I dealt with almost all issues raised in Bill's list, only
>> few small issues le
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629229
Mark Chappell changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable?
>
> Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to
> Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph.
>
On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> 21:33:35 The other 2 items I had were:
> 21:33:56 application installer issues
> 21:33:57 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
> 21:34:04 and
> 21:34:05 BuildIdBuild infrastructure
> 21:34:06 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infra
2010/9/10 Bill Nottingham :
> Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
>> The other option would be to switch to gwibber (which has been
>> un-desktop-couched in Fedora 14, so it theoretically won't bring in
>> nearly as much to the live image.
>
> So, actual testing - building a livecd with gwib
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough
> updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
> reason of an update". If FESCo finds out that this is a bug (some
> packages can be pushed to stable dir
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
>
> My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because
> it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages
> for end users have to go trough as well.
>
The web browser is the attack surface #1 in deskt
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
> wrote:
>
>>
>> My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because
>> it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages
>> for end users have to go trough as
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
> wrote:
>> File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough
>> updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
>> reason of an update". If FESCo finds o
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/14/2010 01:31 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
> >> distribute
> >> unlike say the Intel firmwares
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
> I think the main point here wasn't "there are bugs #X, #Y and #Z that
> can't be fixed in time so we should revert" but a "we have a bad
> feeling / are nervous so lets revert" ... the later isn't really a
> technical decision basis and can (and here it did)
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Shouldn't ABRT be looking to a file like /etc/fedora-release to
> determine the release version?
r...@rawhide:~> cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 15 (Finian)
What you say ;-)?
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
>
>> I think the main point here wasn't "there are bugs #X, #Y and #Z that
>> can't be fixed in time so we should revert" but a "we have a bad
>> feeling / are nervous so lets revert" ... the later isn't real
2010/9/15 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 09/15/2010 05:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2010/9/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
>>> Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the
>>> default
>> I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and
>> return to classical gnome desktop
>
> Yes. GNOME Panel wi
On 09/15/2010 04:29 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> It is still necessary to take into account users who think that
> Gnome-Shell is something like KDE4 :)
In what specific way? They can just continue using GNOME Panel.
>> GNOME Shell is also different from systemd
>> in the sense that it affect
> The only real issues pointed out where lack of documentation and
> system-config-service integration for native services.
> Neither that we have with upstart so not really a regression and thus
> warrant a reject.
That depends on whether we want to raise the bar for features as crucial
as a ini
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:05 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Nice move.
>
> So, we closed all blocker bugs, we worked through the vast majority of
> other bugs. I dealt with almost all issues raised in Bill's list, only
> few small issues left. While there are some bugs open, we did our
> homew
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
> > we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14?
>
> I would agree with this. I certainly plan t
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:07:50 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>> On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 00:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >> Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
> >> we communicate systemd as a technology preview in
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> irregardless of its conclusion?
'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
Yes, I agree, and I'd like to point up another procedural issue here.
Du
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:27 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> In this case the "bad feeling" is justified, because there were too many
> problems too late in the release cycle. It isn't a matter of whether all
> the known bugs are fixed but whether we can be reasonably confident that
> there aren't any
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:25 -0400, Trever Fischer wrote:
> Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send this.
>
> As my fedora ambassador duties, I tend to show other students the neat
> things you can do with Fedora with my trusty USB drive I always keep on my
> keychain. More often than not, I'm
commit 4f01da23674a097bc370e4469256bb5ecdcce5d5
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:17:45 2010 +0100
Update to 0.06
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deleti
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
>> It isn't a matter of whether all
>> the known bugs are fixed but whether we can be reasonably confident that
>> there aren't any more critical bugs that haven't been reported yet or have
>> been introduced
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The Broadcom position seems to be entirely crack-inspired, if it's based
> on the notion that a binary driver cannot be modified to break the
> regulations. That assumption is demonstrably false.
In the lawyers' defense, lots of things h
Compose started at Wed Sep 15 08:15:32 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ale-0.9.0.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libMagickCore.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-p
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:18 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> But you can base it on what bugs were raised or still open during the
> alpha phase. If there were a lot of issues during the alpha phase then
> that is likely to continue in the beta phase. That was why I was
> suggesting you count all bloc
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:18:44PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> I don't think that is enough, as the features can stay the same but the
> code used to achieve this can potentially change completely. My impression
> is that systemd has changed a great deal during the alpha phase even
> though I imag
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27:07 +0100,
M A Young wrote:
>
> I agree. I was worried when systemd appeared in F14 just before the alpha.
> Really we should have been much closer to where we are now at the start of
> the alpha phase, and systemd should have gone in soon after F13 was forked
>
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> integration as session daemon in DEs even further.
There's no reason it should. Remember, F1
2010/9/15 M A Young :
> And that is precisely the problem - the code isn't really stable enough
> yet for Fedora because it has been developed very quickly and so hasn't
> had a chance to stablize yet.
Ok, please point me to the bug filled against systemd, that is a
"stability" issue.
I know that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>> The Broadcom position seems to be entirely crack-inspired, if it's based
>> on the notion that a binary driver cannot be modified to break the
>> regulations. That assumption is
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:01:04 +0200,
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
> wrote:
> > File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough
> > updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
> > reason of an update". If FE
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:39:48PM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 10:13 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>>IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license t
On 09/15/2010 01:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
>> irregardless of its conclusion?
> 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
>
> Yes, I agree, a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS:
d695c3529109ed69ded833163c2a4f43 File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:05:34AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> There's something seriously wrong with the Fedora development
> process, folks. And with you, FESCO. You excelled in erratic behaviour,
> not in steering engineering.
Lennart, I don't think you're being fair. I tried to alert yo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Denise Dumas changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633726
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-ShareDir:
edb4b9d418a03bf9b0cf6d0fa9585c3f File-ShareDir-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:25 -0400, Trever Fischer wrote:
>> Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send this.
>>
>> As my fedora ambassador duties, I tend to show other students the neat
>> things you can do with Fedora with my trusty USB drive I always keep on
>> my
>> keychain. More often tha
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:09:58 -0400,
"John W. Linville" wrote:
>
> AIUI, they main technical reason that they were finally willing to
> open-up was that they were able to add some regulatory enforcement code
> in their firmware. The added firmware functionality required more
> firmware reso
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:01:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend.
> (nirik, 19:30:30)
Sorry, I thought I had mentioned this on IRC before, but I have a
conflict with the current scheduling for the next four months due to a
class
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > irregardless of its conclusion?
>
> 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:49:46AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:09:58 -0400,
> "John W. Linville" wrote:
> >
> > AIUI, they main technical reason that they were finally willing to
> > open-up was that they were able to add some regulatory enforcement code
> > in th
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:57 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > > irregardless of its conclu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:57 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
> >
> > The OED disagrees.
>
> Not r
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:03 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21:33:35 The other 2 items I had were:
> > 21:33:56 application installer issues
> > 21:33:57 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
> > 21:34:04 and
> > 21:34:05 BuildIdB
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > > > irregardless of its conclusion?
> > > 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
> > The OED disagrees.
> Not really. It lists '
commit 7c54128cdca81f038038baa330d571438e820b33
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:12:32 2010 +0200
New release, v0.06
Format-Human-Bytes-no-autoinstall.patch | 10 ++
Format-Human-Bytes-switch_off.patch | 12
perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec| 1
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as session daemon in DEs ev
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Format-Human-Bytes:
709e90c62599def49071735e842632c8 Format-Human-Bytes-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
commit b1ee707c871291591973d62dbe13e2bc5f6699db
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:16:11 2010 +0200
New sources for 0.06
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ff321f7..25f3e8e 100644
commit b33cb75d50ec3b694394945f5f2286fd4cf40cc9
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Sep 15 15:34:50 2010 +0200
1.07 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Mike McGrath said the following on 09/15/2010 07:14 AM Pacific Time:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>>>Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
>>> cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:20:30 -0700,
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> And we are already reviewing and accepting features for Fedora 15. The
> process never stops.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
Thanks for the reminder; I'll put LZMA back in for F15 and hope the kernel
change
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> For people wanting to make big changes to F15.. Do it *now*! F15 is in
> its infancy. It's taking shape. If you want your feature to be a
> defining feature of F15. Get it in *now*.
This seems like a completely sensible idea. Howe
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks:
980d382b277b22c487fef95a8e3d61cd HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
commit 69e0bc83d7c1bd83b80e732b372686032e10d296
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:33:29 2010 +0200
0.11 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(
I suspect I haven't had enough coffee yet, but I don't see the problem
here. Why not simply add "python3-devel" as a build requirement as
Ignacio says?
If a build requirement isn't installed, it's acceptable for a build to
fail: it's a violation of a precondition.
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:35 +08
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:14 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > For people wanting to make big changes to F15.. Do it *now*! F15 is in
> > its infancy. It's taking shape. If you want your feature to be a
> > defining feature of F15. G
While showing the user "applications" instead of packages might be a
good idea for several use cases I think this approach misses the point
here. The questions for redesigning the Updater dialog should be:
What's the user supposed to decide and what information does he need to
do so?
The ans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633728
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:37:55PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm a bit confused. You spend the rest of the mail talking about when
> the feature freeze is for F15, but I'm not sure why. As long as F15 is
> open and it's not frozen (which it obviously isn't, yet) you can start
> doing developm
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:38 +0200, FlorianFesti wrote:
> So I would suggest an UI that gives a summery (Didn't we already have
> that in the past?) and offers 3 buttons:
>
> [Show/Hide Details] [Do not install updates now] [Install updates now]
>
> The first being a toggle button hiding/showing
The main issue is failing to use a macro defined with %__python3 to specify
the version of a requirement.
The recipe is sth like this:
%global py3_ver %(echo `%{__python3} -c "import sys;
sys.stdout.write(sys.version[:3])"`)
...
Requires: python(abi) = %{py3_ver}
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:20:30 -0700,
> John Poelstra wrote:
>>
>> And we are already reviewing and accepting features for Fedora 15. The
>> process never stops.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
>
> Thanks for the r
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> While showing the user "applications" instead of packages might be a
> good idea for several use cases I think this approach misses the point
> here. The questions for redesigning the Updater dialog should be:
It is not only about the update
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:11:03 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
>
> That doesn't work ... someone has to be activly pushing the patches
> upstream .. instead of just waiting and hoping that they magically
> make it in.
It's somewhere on Lougher's to do list. We can still be ready to take advantage
of i
Compose started at Wed Sep 15 13:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:11:03 +0200,
> drago01 wrote:
>>
>> That doesn't work ... someone has to be activly pushing the patches
>> upstream .. instead of just waiting and hoping that they magically
>> make it in.
>
> It's somewhere on
Hi,
I've not come across this (mainly as I've not been that active due to a
mix of work problems and hardware problems which meant a big
re-install). Most of mono is built, but I've just hit this error
*** ERROR: No build ID note found
in
/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mono-2.8-1.fc15.i386/usr/li
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
> The only real issues pointed out where lack of documentation and
> system-config-service integration for native services.
> Neither that we have with upstart so not really a regression and thus
> warrant a reject.
system services have not been migrated to upsta
Hi,
Does anyone know something about this issue?
Setting APIC routing to flat
..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz stepping 0a
lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
===
[ INFO: suspic
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21:33:35 The other 2 items I had were:
> > 21:33:56 application installer issues
> > 21:33:57 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
> > 21:34:04 and
> > 21:34:05 BuildIdBuild infrastr
If I have to wait for the next release of Fedora (14 for example) to
get KDE 4.5 then it's looking like the stable updates vision has made
Fedora incompatible with what I need. I will need to consider another
distribution (OpenSUSE most likely, their GCC 4.5 also doesn't suck;
LTO = enabled). After
Oh, sorry. I may have chosen a bad email subject.
This failed scratch build shows what was happening:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2468876
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> The main issue is failing to use a macro defined with %__python3 to specify
> th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630097
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446995&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447038&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447061&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi,
I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
Fedora or even to get the admins to install RHEL packages in a timely
manner. Bui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
--- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata 2010-09-15 12:07:34 EDT ---
Thanks Paul. I've been playing with the failing tests for a while no
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:53:51AM -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> If I have to wait for the next release of Fedora (14 for example) to
> get KDE 4.5 then it's looking like the stable updates vision has made
If you need the absolute latest of everything without waiting three months
for the release,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even
On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even to get th
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:20:22 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
>
> I said _someone_ not _you_ ;) ... if Lougher is working on it fine.
It's on his to do list, which isn't really the same thing. Lately he
has been doing more getting the extended attributes feature cleaned up
and a bit with the lzo stuf
The Fedora 14 Beta RC compose is scheduled for tomorrow.
ALL open bugs on Fedora 14 Blocker list (http://bit.ly/cZKo9K) MUST BE
FIXED TODAY or we risk delaying the release. In other words we are very
short on time to address the remaining bugs.
Here is the current state of things based on the
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive
> > subject like "HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEF
"Bryn M. Reeves" writes:
> On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
>> So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
>> variants as tickets on bugzilla? Or is there a better way to try to
>> encourage people to generate these packages?
> You might find the Fedora packagin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as ses
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
