-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi LTSP/Fedora Community.
After a flurry of work over night I have finally managed to get some
.rpm's ready for testing on x86_64 F13.
I have uploaded them all to a tmp dir on one of my www sites so you can
download and test them before I push them
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
>
> All other updates must either:
> · reach the criteria laid out in the previous section OR
> · reach the positive Bodhi karma threshold specifie
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:24:58PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
> sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
> under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
> v
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> For libguestfs I'm doing it manually. I have my own git repo which is
> a clone of the upstream libguestfs git repo. In that git repo I have
> the base stable version (eg. 1.4.3) plus cherry-picked patches on top
> of that. I use 'git rebase' when a new stable ve
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 5th Sept were Jens
Petersen, Ben Boeckel and Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus).
Jens Petersen : 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 xmobar
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
>
> > For libguestfs I'm doing it manually. I have my own git repo which is
> > a clone of the upstream libguestfs git repo. In that git repo I have
> > the base stable version (eg. 1.4.3) plus cherry
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:02:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> >
> > > For libguestfs I'm doing it manually. I have my own git repo which is
> > > a clone of the upstream libguestfs git repo
Hi,
I'm going to be orphaning caribou in a few minutes. I'm not the
maintainer of the upstream project anymore and I don't have extra time
to ensure that caribou is packaged properly in Fedora.
I hope somebody who is interested in accessibility will pick this up
so that Fedora will continue to ha
2010/9/8 Daniel P. Berrange :
> When maintaining a proper GIT branch against upstream and cherry picking
> patches, the fact that you might end up with 100's of patches is not
> really a burden anymore. GIT does all the hardwork for you. You can
> automate patchfile creation with git format-patch,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Ben Konrath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to be orphaning caribou in a few minutes. I'm not the
> maintainer of the upstream project anymore and I don't have extra time
> to ensure that caribou is packaged properly in Fedora.
>
> I hope somebody who is interested
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:20:31 -0400, Tom wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >> Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs from being
> >> built if an older one exists in a newer buildroot ? Should it ? Is
> >> there a valid
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
>>
>> All other updates must either:
>> · reach the criteria laid out in the previous sect
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Gavin Spurgeon wrote:
> After a flurry of work over night I have finally managed to get some
> .rpm's ready for testing on x86_64 F13.
>
> A quick question. Can you connect to a x86_64 server with i686 clients
using ltsp?
R.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
Hi Parag,
2010/9/8 Parag N(पराग़) :
> I would like to maintain or co-maintain this package with any other
> who is also interested for this.
> Please add me as maintainer for this package.
The procedure for claiming the ownership of an orphaned package is listed here:
http://fedoraproject.org/w
Greetings testers,
As scheduled, F-14 Beta Test Compose is going to be available soon,
please keep attention on it and execute the installation[1] and
desktop[2] tests to help ensure that the F-14 Beta Release Criterion is
met[3].
Test result pages with detailed testing instructions are at:
h
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 17:13 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +, Branched Report wrote:
> > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
> > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
>
> Yup, this is a cock-up.
>
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 22:33 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> I could swear that a few years ago flash installation was a lot simpler.
You used to be able to use the 64-bit native version, which is why it
was simple. However, the last version of that which Adobe released is
still subject to the h
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 11:13 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2010-09-02, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > Is this problem with flash not working on x86_64 architecture limited to
> > Fedora or what?
> > I use Ubuntu 10.04 64bit as my primary operating system and have 32bit
> > Flash installed with wrapper
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Sure, I understand where you're coming from. As you see from
> app-install schema version 1 it really was least common denominator.
> But version 2, which is in progress now, features application
> screenshot previews (that ubuntu wanted)
Compose started at Wed Sep 8 08:15:28 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
R-hdf5-1.6.9-8.fc14.x86_64 requires hdf5 = 0:1.8.5
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>> Sure, I understand where you're coming from. As you see from
>> app-install schema version 1 it really was least common denominator.
>> But version 2, which is in progress now, fe
On 8 September 2010 13:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> First off, I think this is a great idea and very much needed, thanks for
> working on it.
Cool, thanks. Some positive feedback at last! Too... much... stop... energy...
> On the cross-distro front, is Canonical / Ubuntu officially involved in
>
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 13:43 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> But of course, Fedora is an early adopter and driving development.
> Just like normal. Just like it should be.
Sure. I just hoped they were plugged into this process in some sense so
that if it does meet their needs in future they'll look
Thomas Moschny wrote:
> Btw, topgit is awaiting review [2] ;)
Will trade[1] :) .
--Ben
http://blipper.dev.benboeckel.net/files/fedora-hs-review-requests.txt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Could Koji provide all the available versions of packages in a repository?
Even http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/ indexes only the latest
package versions there. Also f14 is not available there.
--
Otherw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630096
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442982&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442983&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442988&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631224
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Compose started at Wed Sep 8 13:15:35 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 19:21 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> seth vidal fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
> > http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders
> >
> > that's how it does it.
>
> Thanks. I didn't understand all of that, but since it only describes the
> current
> algorithm in detail, and t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630093
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446014&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446023&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631074
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631112
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631141
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631131
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631224
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631166
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631192
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631098
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631113
FTBFS changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 13:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> First off, I think this is a great idea and very much needed, thanks for
>> working on it.
>
> Cool, thanks. Some positive feedback at last! Too... much... stop... energy...
FWIW the way
Summary of changes:
723de75... update to 0.07003 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> A patch would be lovely, but some sample code that renders a ttf file
> to a png file "The smart brown fox or whatever" using cairo is
> probably good enough for me to get going.
Just to be clear. When "users" want a to get a new font what
The koji database does contain the file lists in some fashion.
You can see from the "info" link for an rpm on a "buildinfo" page.
e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=180269
-> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2041477
I bet some koji guru around here can wr
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:00 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > I was participating in the Systemd Fedora Test Day and installed the
> > latest Fedora 14 build. I found a few problems (I will file bugs) but
> > before I file a bug about NetworkMa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.09.2010 19:55, schrieb Dan Williams:
> The expected way to do this is to use the config window in Anaconda,
> create a new connection set up the way you want, check "Connect
> automatically" and "Available to all users", then hit Apply.
>
> If t
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> A patch would be lovely, but some sample code that renders a ttf file
>> to a png file "The smart brown fox or whatever" using cairo is
>> probably good enough for me to get going.
>
>
>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:59 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>> A patch would be lovely, but some sample code that renders a ttf file
>>> to a png file "The smart brown fox or whatever" using cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631306
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 09:18 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Just to be clear. When "users" want a to get a new font what is the
> ideal software interaction path you expect them to take to find fonts?
> It's not clear that app-install is what you expect them to interact
> with. I do sort of expect no
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 19:58 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 08.09.2010 19:55, schrieb Dan Williams:
> > The expected way to do this is to use the config window in Anaconda,
> > create a new connection set up the way you want, check "Connect
> >
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
> I know fonts come in RPMs, but tbh as a user I could really care less.
I'm not disagreeing. But since fonts have come up in the context of
app-install.. I'd like to hear what the main PackageKit developer
thinks about fonts as _packages_.
I un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.09.2010 20:18, schrieb Dan Williams:
> On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 19:58 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: And what I
> have to do, to get this configuration after Fedora was installed?
>
>> Do you mean to create a new network connection, or to use it?
>
>
Summary of changes:
80ac82a... Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. BR (*)
8d1f60e... - Adjust License-tag. - BR: perl(Test::More) (BZ 419631). (*)
1229d17... new perl (*)
b20b1d2... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass (*)
91b35ab... - Rebuilt
commit cfec55fc191603a71b8d8d499eca650251a64446
Merge: 95b3e4d 8fe211e
Author: Xavier Bachelot
Date: Wed Sep 8 20:59:59 2010 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el4
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec | 37 +
sources
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 10:53 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The koji database does contain the file lists in some fashion.
> You can see from the "info" link for an rpm on a "buildinfo" page.
> e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=180269
> -> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 12:55 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:00 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> > > I was participating in the Systemd Fedora Test Day and installed the
> > > latest Fedora 14 build. I found a few proble
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 22:23 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> On 7 September 2010 17:32, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> And BTW a request at the time was to extend it with font previews to get
> >> a "font store" (because for fonts, gfx preview is really relevant and
> >> not eye candy) and it
There will be an outage starting at 2010-09-10 00:00:00 UTC, which
will last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2010-09-10 00:00:00 UTC'
BFO - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/
Bodhi - htt
Another sip, another abi bump, affected pkgs include:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'sip-api(7)'
PyKDE-0:3.16.6-4.fc14
PyKDE4-0:4.5.1-1.fc15
PyQt-0:3.18.1-7.fc14
PyQt4-0:4.7.4-2.fc14
PyQwt-0:5.2.0-8.fc14
avogadro-libs-0:1.0.1-6.fc15
qedje-python-0:0.4.0-7.fc14
qgis-python-0:1.5.0-3.fc1
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic:
e2a24627d6c152ec0b4156132b739694 Perl-Critic-1.106.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 09:18 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
>
> Just to be clear. When "users" want a to get a new font what is the
> ideal software interaction path you expect them to take to find fonts?
> It's not clear that app-install is what you expect them to interact
> with. I do so
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 19:07 +0100, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> The i18n situation is also pretty sad from my point of view too. If you
> use pretty much any design app, OO Writer and Inkscape being the ones
> which cause me pain, the standard set of fonts that comes with Fedora is
> entirely
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 21:35 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> so by combining code from both it should be possible to create a small
> utility that takes as argument a font file and a locale and generates a
> svg (or svgz) containing the pangram text for this locale with the
> shapes of
Summary of changes:
ec797f6... Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. (*)
f58f164... - Adjust License-tag. - BR: perl(Test::More) (BZ 419631). (*)
e857071... new perl (*)
6a7aac1... Update to 0.26. (*)
9a06684... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Ma
commit ad41502630a1fa771fd67eb3178241a1b6e15e8b
Merge: eb0f2c1 a413f76
Author: Xavier Bachelot
Date: Wed Sep 8 23:09:33 2010 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el5
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-DateTime-Set.spec | 39 +++
sources
It looks like the nss-3.12.8-0.1.beta1.fc13 in spot's firefox4 repo is
breaking fedpkg upload (and new-sources, of course) when you have a
shiny new 2048-bit client certificate.
My old certificate expired yesterday, so I got a shiny new one.
Firefox itself was okay - no problem to connect to koji
Le 09/09/2010 06:30, Iain Arnell a écrit :
> It looks like the nss-3.12.8-0.1.beta1.fc13 in spot's firefox4 repo is
> breaking fedpkg upload (and new-sources, of course) when you have a
> shiny new 2048-bit client certificate.
That's the reason why, for my backport/build, I don't override system
l
It's that time again! The Fedora 14 Release Candidate is scheduled for
creation one week from this Thursday on 2010-09-16. That task cannot be
completed if we have open blocker bugs (listed below). The sooner we
address these bugs the greater the likelihood we have of having time to
fix last
68 matches
Mail list logo
