Re: Testing zsh completion for fedpkg

2010-08-25 Thread Christopher Aillon
On 08/24/2010 07:31 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 7/30/10 9:34 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: >>> I'd like to get some wider testing on it than what I subjected it to. >>> Constructive criticism welcome. >>> >> >> Did you ever ge

Re: git rebase OK on Fedora git branches?

2010-08-25 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/25/10 3:45 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of Wed Aug 25 11:08:16 +0200 2010: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:34:36AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>>

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-25 Thread drago01
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:35 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> Indeed, imo we should add them to the release criteria. > > It's a rather indigestible lump, for the criteria. James and I were > thinking about a 'module' system for the release criter

systemd and cgroups: heads up

2010-08-25 Thread Matthew Miller
If you are using the libcgroup package, and in particular the cgconfig serivice, be aware that this will break systemd. This package is pulled into Fedora by policycoreutils, so you likely have it on your system. However, cgconfig is not enabled by default. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: systemd and cgroups: heads up

2010-08-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 25.08.10 17:04, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote: > If you are using the libcgroup package, and in particular the cgconfig > serivice, be aware that this will break systemd. This package is pulled into > Fedora by policycoreutils, so you likely have it on your system. However, > cg

Re: Testing zsh completion for fedpkg

2010-08-25 Thread Ben Boeckel
Christopher Aillon wrote: > I missed the first notice of this go by, but I use zsh so can play with > it in the next few days. Can you post the updates so I don't hit the > same bugs you did? Sure. Attached. The bugs were mainly with zsh conventions and getting the sed command for the branch s

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-25 Thread Ben Boeckel
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > Its got nothing to do with gnome what so ever. I don't see what that > has to do with the discussion. I actually want it so its easy to make > tiny appliances and routers without having to manually strip a whole > lot of crap out. As I mentioned above there's nothing

Re: is it still possible to use upstart as the init-system in F-14?

2010-08-25 Thread M A Young
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/25/2010 05:35 PM, M A Young wrote: >> Yes, upstart still works. I tried systemd and couldn't get it to work, so >> I switched the machine back to upstart. You may need a rescue disk to make >> the switch if your computer doesn't boot with systemd.

If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

2010-08-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya! We shifted a few files around and most likely your /etc/systemd/system/default.target link will now point into the void, in case anaconda wrote it. If that happens to you and you end up in a rescue shell instead of a full system after booting with v8, then please execute the following: #

Re: is it still possible to use upstart as the init-system in F-14?

2010-08-25 Thread Tom London
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, M A Young wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On 08/25/2010 05:35 PM, M A Young wrote: >>> Yes, upstart still works. I tried systemd and couldn't get it to work, so >>> I switched the machine back to upstart. You may need a rescue disk to make

Re: is it still possible to use upstart as the init-system in F-14?

2010-08-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
B1;2590;0cOn Thu, 26.08.10 00:45, M A Young (m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 08/25/2010 05:35 PM, M A Young wrote: > >> Yes, upstart still works. I tried systemd and couldn't get it to work, so > >> I switched the machine back to upstart. Yo

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/8/24 Manuel Escudero > > > 2010/8/24 Kevin Kofler > > Michal Hlavinka wrote: >> > disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer >> > alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)? >> > >> > You'll get tons of "User XY has changed status to:

Old gdm themes

2010-08-25 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Why are bluecurve-gdm-theme and fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme still in the distribution? The other gdm theme packages were deprecated after F12 (!?!), and I was under the impression that none of them work with new-style gdm at all. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-25 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is > > declining.  What we can prove, and certainly is troublesome, is that > > yum check-ins of successive releases have been droppi

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-25 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:41 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields > > wrote: > > > I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is > > > declining. What we can prove, and certainly is troubles

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Mika Kuusela
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:05 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote: > Now, this is the Fedora search engine: > > > http://ubuntuone.com/p/DuP/ > > > I was wondering if it's possible to integrate a search box into hermes > that uses that engine as a base... The start.fedoraproject.org search engine is n

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/8/25 Mika Kuusela > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:05 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > > Now, this is the Fedora search engine: > > > > > > http://ubuntuone.com/p/DuP/ > > > > > > I was wondering if it's possible to integrate a search box into hermes > > that uses that engine as a base... > > The

Re: systemd and cgroups: heads up

2010-08-25 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/25/2010 05:46 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 25.08.10 17:04, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote: > >> If you are using the libcgroup package, and in particular the cgconfig >> serivice, be aware that this will break systemd. This

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Manuel Escudero wrote: > I dont' know if it's possible to tweak the code of these apps, Or we can > use Google Gadgets as a Base, Please don't rely on Google stuff. The native RSS plasmoid is just fine. There's also Akregator, which is a regular KDE app to browse RSS feeds. We don't really need

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michal Hlavinka wrote: > disabling something won't fix it, also I don't think this is that bad that > it requires extra patch to turn it off by default and diverge from > upstream It shouldn't require a patch, just a config setting. That's what kde- settings is for. (But I also think the default

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 19:41, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> > I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is >> > declining.  What we can prove, and certainly is troublesome, is that

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-25 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/8/25 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:52:45AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> > FWIW, I'm with Jon and Adam on this one. I just don't see how not having >> > an MTA by default is a win, except in disk space terms, a

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote: > 3. keep a history of the notifications > 4. max. number of notifications at the time > 5. click able notifications > 6. stackable notifications I think that, at least on KDE, you really want to leave that stuff to the KNotify system, it already does all this stuff wel

<    1   2