On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 17:31, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > > 20:07:05 nirik: hence F15, I think
> > > > 20:07:11 nirik/adamw: I know lennart was working on a bugfix
> > > >release of systemd todasy
> >
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
> > infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
> > users?
> >
> > Or were you
Piscium píše v Po 23. 08. 2010 v 23:14 +0100:
> It seems to me that it is mostly sysadmins that are concerned about
> systemd. That is understandable, they are the group of users that will
> be most affected by the new paradigm, and will have to learn new
> tricks.
>
> Yet sysadmins are just a se
On 08/24/2010 03:55 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Right. So the problem is to not actually break PackageKit's notification
> system, not to add blue tack and scotch tape on top of it.
The proposed solution is not just for package update issues but for
general announcements that are of importance to
2010/8/23 Miloslav Trmač :
> If non-sysadmins will hardly notice the new init system, shouldn't the
> sysadmins, who will notice, be the primary consideration?
> Mirek
Not IMO. Sysadmins are just one group of stakeholders. My intervention
was just to put things in perspective.
However if a sysad
On Mon, 23.08.10 17:04, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I am not sure what your problem with me or systemd is, but I'd prefer
> > you dropped those personal attacks, or at least if you call me a
> > pretender point me to where I supposedly "pretended" something.
> >
> > Also, given h
On Mon, 23.08.10 18:24, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote:
> With my former "QA architect" hat on: please do have a test day for
> systemd, and try to cover a broad range of different uses and use cases:
> with a change this deep, it's the things you're not expecting that cause
> the "inte
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 13:59, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote:
>
> > On 8/23/10 1:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > I understand your desire to get your code out there in the real world. But
> > > Fedora really can't a
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 14:50 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 04:31:08PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
> > David Malcolm wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing
> > > something lik
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 19:16 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I just built Python 3.2a1 into rawhide:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191382
> > so the meaning of "python3" in rawhide just jumped from Python 3.1 to
>
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:51 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:29:38 +0800
> Chen Lei wrote:
>
> > 2010/8/22 Thomas Spura :
> > > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
> > > David Malcolm wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >>
> > >> So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages,
>
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:24:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
> > > > > F15Feature to aim for. Ubun
(intentionally breaking thread)
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> Maybe I should start a new thread since this isn't really a bug, but it is
> a blocker -- we need to get some packaging guidelines out for systemd.
> I think that the last message on the subject was this one:
>
> http:/
Top FAS account holder who has completed reviewing "Package review"
components on bugzilla for last week ending 22nd August is Emmanuel
Seyman.
Emmanuel Seyman : 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624339
perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> This, however, is just packaging guidelines. From readng the thread, there
> are many things that I think people would like covered with systemd before
> they would feel comfortable with it. So, I'm going to attempt to quantify
> wh
2010/8/23 drago01 :
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
>>> > > My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to
>>> > > quantify
>>> > > the unknown unknown, and de
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 08:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > Some more tags for "functionally comparable to" and the name of
> > some well known programs for Windows or Macintosh would let
> > people cope with the original names of Linux apps.
> >
> > Nero -> k3b, xcdroast
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/30/10 9:34 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> I'd like to get some wider testing on it than what I subjected it to.
> Constructive criticism welcome.
>
Did you ever get testing on this?
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build. Here is a summary from the rpm:
- - Error check the update call. #625679
- - Use the correct remote when listing revs
- - Add the bash complet
Hi, folks. There's a meeting slot tomorrow at the usual time, 2010-08-24
15:00 UTC. There's nothing new on the agenda page -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers:meeting-agenda-list - and I
can't think of any particularly pressing topics, so we may not need to
have a meeting. I'll be around in
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
