David Woodhouse writes:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>> This is how I did it for CVS, I did not yet implement this for git:
>> http://blogs.23.nu/till/2008/12/ssh-via-cvs-with-automatic-control-socket-support/
>
> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 has a mu
Hi,
I have the impression that the DVBT-USB stick mentioned in the subject
line is not supported by F14. After plugging in, I got an error msg:
missing firmware file in /lib/firmware:
==
Aug 17 16:13:56 localhost kernel: dvb
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the impression that the DVBT-USB stick mentioned in the subject line
> is not supported by F14. After plugging in, I got an error msg: missing
> firmware file in /lib/firmware:
>
> ===
> So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to
> /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine.
>
> So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in >= F15
> versions?
AFAIK this firmware seems not to be free.
> Nice query. I have a AVerTV Hybrid Volar H
On 08/18/2010 11:40 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to
/lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine.
So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in>= F15
versions?
AFAIK this firmware seems not to be free.
M
The unix2dos and dos2unix packages have merged upstream and I've been
sent a spec file that upgrades dos2unix to the new upstream version. It
correctly obsoletes the unix2dos package.
Is it too late in the Fedora 14 cycle to bring this package in (and
retire unix2dos)?
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
D
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> The unix2dos and dos2unix packages have merged upstream and I've been
> sent a spec file that upgrades dos2unix to the new upstream version. It
> correctly obsoletes the unix2dos package.
>
> Is it too late in the Fedora 14 cycle to bring this
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Fedora Engineering Services
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received
> request to get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths
> (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/31).
>
>
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > Fedora Engineering Services
> > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received
> > request to get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths
> >
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 13:15:15 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620927
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=diff
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.c
Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time:
> Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well?
>
What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides, "Do awesome stuff in the
'rawhide' branch?" :-)
I can certainly draft a Fedora 15 version of the schedule if people are
On 08/18/2010 10:06 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time:
>> Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well?
>>
>
> What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides, "Do awesome stuff in the
> 'rawhide' branch?" :-)
That might be it -
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 05:40 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to
> > /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine.
> >
> > So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in >= F15
> > versions?
>
> AFAIK this fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 3:01 PM, M A Young wrote:
> What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
> be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
>
> My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/02/2010 11:55 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
>>> Didn't want this to get lost, thanks for fixing this on IRC, but I
Release bump scripts bumping release version numbers for prereleases should
be handled more carefully or they can cause update problems later on.
For example xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-0.20100705git37b348059.fc14 got bumped
to xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-1.20100705git37b348059.fc14 and then later
xorg-x11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/9/10 6:54 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while working on `nas' package I found `fedpkg local' redefines
> `fedora' macro to value `1'. Dist-cvs `make local' does not do that.
> Original source for %fedora is /etc/rpm/macros.dist. See the str
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/18/10 11:49 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Release bump scripts bumping release version numbers for prereleases should
> be handled more carefully or they can cause update problems later on.
> For example xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.1-0.20100705git37b3480
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:04:33 -0700,
Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> This likely happened because the original release string was non-conformant.
I missed that. After that happened it looks like the release string did get
changed to be conformant.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:04:33 -0700, Jesse wrote:
> The bump script lives in releng git repo (git.fedorahosted.org/releng if
> anybody wants to hack on it.
Sure about that? All I could find there was a reference to rpmdev-bumpspec
(part of "rpmdevtools" package nowadays). The older script's home i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/18/10 12:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:04:33 -0700, Jesse wrote:
>
>> The bump script lives in releng git repo (git.fedorahosted.org/releng if
>> anybody wants to hack on it.
>
> Sure about that? All I could find there
Adam Williamson wrote:
> To me, that reads more like a problem with the update submission system
> than anything. I'd like to see far fewer restrictions on it (just like
> I'd like for koji), so you could edit the existing update to add your
> packages. This same issue exists even without feedback
Thomas Janssen wrote:
> I'm part of the KDE SIG. I will apply today for proventester to become
> the KDE proventester.
Actually, Rex Dieter already started the application process, so you'll
probably become "a" KDE proventester, not "the" KDE proventester. ;-)
But the more proventesters we have,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> I'm part of the KDE SIG. I will apply today for proventester to become
>> the KDE proventester.
>
> Actually, Rex Dieter already started the application process, so you'll
> probably become "a" KDE proventester, not "t
Thomas Janssen wrote:
> Another BTW, if you think you have to write "something", a simple
> 'thank you for stepping up' would have been enough.
Well, yes, thank you for stepping up, your help is very much appreciated! I
didn't mean to offend you!
(And thanks to Rex Dieter as well, by the way.)
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:43:57 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 08/02/2010 11:55 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> >>> Didn't want this to get lost, thanks for fi
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:43 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 10:06 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Orion Poplawski said the following on 08/16/2010 08:39 PM Pacific Time:
> >> Perhaps it makes sense to be posting F-15 tasks as well?
> >>
> >
> > What would the Fedora 15 tasks be besides,
Paul Howarth wrote:
> No changes: the heads of the f12, f13, f14 and master branches all
> point to the "dist-git conversion" commit.
In case it matters, these branches point to two completely separate
commits; f12 has an entirely different history from f13, f14, and master
as far as git is conc
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> However, since git allows you to create local branches at will without
> any restrictions, one has to ask if it is still necessary to have a
> remote branch for your work.
I did end up creating a branch in the Fedora system because it was the
only way
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep
> down a bunch of extra info on every update of libguestfs and that sucks
> on my bandwidth.
This is basically a hard problem to solve. We rely on copying files
dire
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:43:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
This one too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_tree
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. C
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:10:11AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya,
>
> just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a
> few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of
> the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target
> rc-local.service remote-fs.target
> >
> > And that should make things work again.
>
> even after doing this, I still haven't managed to get a single box runnin
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target
> > rc-local.service remote-fs.target
> > >
> > > And that should make things work
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:45, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target
> rc-local.serv
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single
> > message
> > > > from systemd in the logs.
> > >
> > > There should be an explanation in dmesg, that it cannot find
> > default.target.
>
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:00, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Hmm, could be. Note that we log to kmsg as long as syslog isn't up, so
> > nothing should get lost -- as long as you manage to get a shell somehow.
> >
> > BTW, as a side note: a simply fix to bypass the problem with a missing
>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single
> message
> > > > > from systemd in the logs.
> > > >
> > > > There shou
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:35, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a
> single message
At the Go/No-Go meeting a few minutes ago the Fedora 14 Alpha release
was declared GOLD. Thank you to everyone who contributed to making it
happen!
All the details of the meeting can be found here:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-08-19/fedora-meeting.2010-08-19-00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/18/10 1:31 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:43:57 -0700
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 8/5/10 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> On 02/08/10 20:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Pasi, Xen developers, and Han Weidong of Intel Corporation,
I have made a video demonstrating Intel IGD (primary VGA adapter) VGA
passthrough to Windows XP Home Edition HVM domU virtual machine with Xen
4.0.1-rc6-pre and Jeremy Fitzhardinge's pv-ops dom0 kernel 2.6.32.19 on
18 August 2010
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep
> > down a bunch of extra info on every update of libguestfs and that sucks
> > on my bandwidth.
>
>
numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two
packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora,
however both of them can also work file with numpy.
repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray
python-numarray-0:1.5.2-10.fc14.x86_64
HippoDraw-devel-0:1.
2010/8/19 Chen Lei :
> numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two
> packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora,
> however both of them can also work file with numpy.
>
> repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray
> python-numarray-0:1.5.2-10.
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or
> > less equal to not shipping it, frankly. No-one would use the thing.
>
> What I suggest is just to use the same old JavaScript interpreter w
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:29:35PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep
> > > down a bunch of extra info
50 matches
Mail list logo
