Peng Wu wrote, at 08/17/2010 03:36 PM +9:00:
> Hi,
>I tried to rebuild ibus-pinyin package for Fedora 14 which uses
> boost::signals2, but it failed.
>Later I write a very simple test file, compiling use:
>$g++ -c boost_test.cpp
>And the test file content and compiling error log ar
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC"
https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:56, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 2010/8/13 Garrett Holmstrom :
>> On 8/12/2010 9:16, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 18:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> While I think Firefox could do several things to increase it's real
> security instead of it's apparent security, I was actually complaining
> about the server side. Sites that use javascript encourage people to
Then why were you doing i
Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting
Date: 2010-08-17
Time: 15:00 UTC
Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Agenda Items:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers:meeting-agenda-list
If anyone has an additional topic they would like discussed, please
reply to this email.
= Agenda =
* triag
2010/8/17 Christof Damian :
> Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC"
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
>
> Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
Yes, unfortunately. Despite of all my efforts to distribute load
uniformly over a couple of days they encount
Thanks for the tip. It's sort of annoying that this new API is not in
Python < 2.7, necessitating a bunch of #ifdef's in the code. This is
the patch I came up with:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2010-August/msg00053.html
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
> "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
> has been done and there's a "reasonable" certainty the flaw is in the
> library code in
On Friday, August 13, 2010 07:21:50 pm Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:17 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Friday, August 13, 2010 05:09:17 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > > Then we have to push broken updates, policy says so and it's ok, so
> > > > le
Compose started at Tue Aug 17 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:32:28AM -0400, Naveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>Can we use .swf files to develop open source applications? Some of the
> links, that maybe useful here:
The support for flash in free software exists, but is still not at the level
of proprietarysupport. There are many proj
2010/8/17 Rawhide Report :
> Compose started at Tue Aug 17 08:15:07 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
[snip]
> 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit)
> 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libvala.so.0()(64bit)
> antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.no
abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
> abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
>
In abrt-gui, click on edit/plugins lists bugzilla under 'not loaded
plugins'.
In /etc/abrt/plugins,
I have Bugzilla.conf:
Enabled = yes
# Bugzilla URL
BugzillaURL = https:
On 08/17/2010 02:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
>
Can you please run:
rpm -qa | grep abrt
to check if you have installed all the required packages? Or you can try
to install:
$ yum install abrt-desktop
which should pull-
Ryan Rix (r...@n.rix.si) said:
> available (sometimes in front of it)... Yet even now, we can't keep up with
> what (some of) our users want: the latest KDE, on KDE's release day, whether
> it's a major release, or a point release. Yes, not every one of our users is
> this way, but many are, an
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedor
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as po
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
> Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
>> "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
>> has been done and there's
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 02:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
>>
>> The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
>>
>
> Can you please run:
>
> rpm -qa | grep abrt
>
> to check if you have installed all the required packages? Or you can try
> to install:
>
>
Compose started at Tue Aug 17 13:15:41 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:49:29 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Spura
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
> > Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should
> >> remain "assigned" to the actu
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Spura
wrote:
>
> Without a clear way "how to reproduce" it, they can't help here
One advantage of automated collection (or semi-automated like ABRT) is
that given enough crashes, it can be easier to track down the root
cause. So it's useful to have the re
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:20:18 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Spura
> wrote:
> >
> > Without a clear way "how to reproduce" it, they can't help here
>
> One advantage of automated collection (or semi-automated like ABRT) is
> that given enough crashes, it can
On Saturday, August 14, 2010 07:57:27 pm Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 19:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Martin Sourada wrote:
> > > I still remember the epic fail of having KDE 4.0 in stable fedora
> >
> > * I still think the KDE 4.0.3 we shipped in F9 wasn't that bad. We fixed
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
> "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
> has been done and there's a "reasonable" certainty the flaw is in the
> library code in whi
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:14 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:03:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 21:57 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > If this is okay, then I'd modify
On 08/17/2010 01:11 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
>> "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
>> has been done and there's a "reasonable" cert
Last year I had the same error:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-October/039845.html
Now I'm getting it again:
fedpkg update
[...]
Creating a new update for libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13
libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13 not tagged as an update candidate
What does this error mea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2010 19:48, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> fedpkg update
> [...]
> Creating a new update for libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13
> libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13 not tagged as an update candidate
>
> What does this error mean (again)?
>
It's seem, that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/17/10 10:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Last year I had the same error:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-October/039845.html
>
> Now I'm getting it again:
>
> fedpkg update
> [...]
> Creating a new update f
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:01:06AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/17/10 10:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Last year I had the same error:
> >
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-October/039845.html
> >
> > N
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:05:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The working could be better ...
'wording' even.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or
> less equal to not shipping it, frankly. No-one would use the thing.
What I suggest is just to use the same old JavaScript interpreter we have
used before the JIT was introduced, which they undoubtedly
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> So, on the whole, I agree with you. My only question is whether we're in
> a transitional period or if the culture is changing so slowly that we'll
> never get out of this treatment of our time resources.
I think it's neither. It's that the "new way of working" being sugg
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> You can build some faster-moving feature packages on top of a stable base
> for those that want it.
In theory you can. In practice that turns out to work rather poorly. It's
the model several other distros are using; their "feature updates"
repositories are always underu
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> And we did it - now we can slow down - we'd like to go with one major
> update for a Fedora release.
Maybe you do. :-) I don't. I believe that all Fedora releases deserve the
same kind of update support until their respective EOL.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> But note, that nothing in the Fedora update policy changes would prevent
> from the same push during the _development_ phase either. So you might
> be dissatisfied with the KDE-4.0 in F9 but this can happen with other
> packages or package stacks in new Fedora releases regardles
On 08/16/2010 03:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/16/10 1:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Is it possible to checkout an entire Fedora release now with git? I used to
>> have a checkout of the "devel" branch which was useful for grepping all of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/17/10 1:07 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/16/2010 03:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 8/16/10 1:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Is it possible to checkout an entire Fedora release now w
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> The support for flash in free software exists, but is still not at the
> level of proprietarysupport.
Indeed, Gnash doesn't support the latest ActionScript spec which most new
stuff is written in (especially when people are trying to actually use Flash
for programming as o
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Mike McGrath wrote:
>>> Luckily Remi got a list:
>>>
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html
>>
>> Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*, I think there
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-08-17)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:02 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-08-17/fesco.2010-08-17-19.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On 08/17/2010 02:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> If you're able to create a long term ssh socket to the git server you
> could re-use the connection and save a significant portion of the
> connection overhead.
Interesting idea, but I don't see how to do this. git clone is taking the
ssh: url and m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/17/10 2:12 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 02:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> If you're able to create a long term ssh socket to the git server you
>> could re-use the connection and save a significant portion of the
>> connection overhe
The lightweight tag 'perl-File-Comments-0.07-4.el6' was created pointing to:
177073d... dist-git conversion
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:12:14PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 02:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > If you're able to create a long term ssh socket to the git server you
> > could re-use the connection and save a significant portion of the
> > connection overhead.
>
> Interesting i
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:29 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Most problems in updates are task for Auto QA, not a very strict policy (I
> would say it's more strict than RHEL updates :))). And I'm not completely
This is clearly hyperbole. Really, we've pointed out multiple times that
all you nee
On 08/17/2010 03:22 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:12:14PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 08/17/2010 02:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> If you're able to create a long term ssh socket to the git server you
>>> could re-use the connection and save a significant portion of the
Adam Williamson wrote:
> As several people have pointed out, there's a fundamental inconsistency
> in your position - you can't simultaneously claim that lots of people
> are frothing at the mouth for new releases of KDE, but it's really hard
> to find anyone to test the updates. If there's so many
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 01:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > As several people have pointed out, there's a fundamental inconsistency
> > in your position - you can't simultaneously claim that lots of people
> > are frothing at the mouth for new releases of KDE, but it's reall
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Thursday, August 19, 2010, @ 12:00 AM UTC ( *20:00 EDT/17:00 PDT--
Wednesday, August 18, 2010* )
"Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a p
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> This is how I did it for CVS, I did not yet implement this for git:
> http://blogs.23.nu/till/2008/12/ssh-via-cvs-with-automatic-control-socket-support/
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 has a much nicer
solution than the shell
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Admittedly, yeah, +1ing an update you did yourself is bad form.
Actually, FESCo said that Bodhi should not count such self-voted karma at
all. If it still does, that's a feature which is likely to go away very
soon. :-(
> Then advise the KDE team to submit updates with
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 03:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> That particular update was not submitted by us, but by the guy who did all
> the Python 2.7 rebuilds.
>
> The annoying thing is, I have a newer KDevelop build (an upgrade to an
> upstream point release) I want to push to testing, but as l
Le 13/08/2010 12:31, Christof Damian a écrit :
>> php-pear-Structures-DataGrid*.
>> php-pear-Benchmark
I will be glad to have co-maintainer on this.
Just ask in pkgdb.
+
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 01:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > As several people have pointed out, there's a fundamental inconsistency
>> > in your position - you can't simultaneously claim that lots of people
>> > ar
56 matches
Mail list logo
