Hi there,
I was wondering if there is any process that we (spin developers - music
list) could use to confirm that a spin iso was
1. built with a particular kickstart file (or list of files when there
is kickstart %include x directives).
2. hasn't been doctored on purpose eg by the person building
At 21:08 on 14 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Right, not very convenient at all. There is a bug open with K9, the
> email client I'm using, to allow for bottom posting, but given how it
> seem bottom posting is relegated to nerd lists anyway it may not
> happen. Sadly the vast majority of the wo
Hi,
I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X300 based laptop (x86) and tried to
boot the boot.iso by using livecd-iso-to-disk but the installer could
not see the image (CD/DVD not present, other options NFS, local disk -
not including the USB device, URL, etc) once the laptop booted from
usb. It did not ma
Compose started at Sun Aug 15 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc1
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:08:12 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/14/2010 08:50 PM, inode0 wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 14, 2010, Jesse Keating
> > wrote:
> >> I'm still looking for an android email client that allows me to
> >> place the repl
Dear All,
May I know whether the upcoming F14 release will include support for Xen
pv-ops Dom0 kernel?
Thank you very much.
Yours sincerely,
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Citizenship: Singapore Citizen/Singaporean
Facebook account:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10750083982
Locatio
"Mark Knoop" wrote:
>
>1. Hit reply
>2. Long-touch on the quoted text > Copy all
>3. Long-touch on the message text > Paste
>4. Touch the [X] above the quoted text to remove the original quoted
Hey, that's not too bad. Thanks!
--
Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.
--
devel
Compose started at Sun Aug 15 13:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Andrew Clayton
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:08:12 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/14/2010 08:50 PM, inode0 wrote:
>> > On Saturday, August 14, 2010, Jesse Keating
>> > wrote:
>> >> I'm still looking
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:25:46PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I am aware of that. But FESCo has the authority to override the
> maintainer, and in their recent discussion of the SELinux patch, they
> decided not to move forward on the basis of the trademarks:
>
> https://meetbot.fedoraprojec
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> We have the authority to do that, and the decision you're referring to
> effectively *did* override the maintainer by saying that the selinux
> policy change should be reverted. If a package is generally
> well-maintained and then broken by a change introduced by another
>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 19:02:36 +1000,
David Timms wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there is any process that we (spin developers - music
> list) could use to confirm that a spin iso was
> 1. built with a particular kickstart file (or list of files when there
> is kickstart %include x directives)
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 18:26 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But the end effect is, we're allowing a web browser to disable memory
> protection, exposing all users to a severe security risk from merely
> browsing web sites. IMHO, the performance improvements in JavaScript aren't
> worth that risk.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:07:47 +0800
"Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore"
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> May I know whether the upcoming F14 release will include support for
> Xen pv-ops Dom0 kernel?
>
> Thank you very much.
No, I don't think so.
There is an experemental dom0 kernel available
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 18:26 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> But the end effect is, we're allowing a web browser to disable memory
>> protection, exposing all users to a severe security risk from merely
>> browsing web sites. IMHO, the performa
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 22:41 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Matt McCutchen
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 18:26 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> But the end effect is, we're allowing a web browser to disable memory
> >> protection, exposing all users to a severe securi
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 22:41 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Matt McCutchen
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 18:26 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> >> But the end effect is, we're allowing a web browser to disabl
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote:
> May I know whether the upcoming F14 release will include support for Xen
> pv-ops Dom0 kernel?
No. The Fedora policy isn't to include dom0 support until it makes it into
the upstream kernel. Some pieces have made it into
drago01 wrote:
> The times where javascript is only used for some fancy effects are
> long over ... welcome to 2010 ;)
Some web sites are indeed abusing JavaScript. Why should we promote this
behavior? It is a vehicle for proprietary software, where people often
aren't even aware they're using n
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 01:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Some web sites are indeed abusing JavaScript.
> A web site is
> not and should not be an application, an application is not and should not
> be a web site.
Just because you said so? Web applications bring enormous practical
benefits to t
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> If you use a non-free web site, you have already lost the freedom to
> read, distribute, and modify the code you are relying on
> (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html).
> I fail to see how running the site's non-free JavaScript for the sole
>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 16:44:29 -0700,
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 01:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Some web sites are indeed abusing JavaScript.
>
> > A web site is
> > not and should not be an application, an application is not and should not
> > be a web site.
>
> J
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 16:44:29 -0700,
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 01:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Some web sites are indeed abusing JavaScript.
>>
>> > A web site is
>> > not and should not be an application,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 13:09, List Troll wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Martin Sourada wrote:
>>> I still remember the epic fail of having KDE 4.0 in stable fedora
>>
>> * I still think the KDE 4.0.3 we shipped in F9 wasn't that bad. We fixed all
>> the showstop
Dear M A Young,
Thank you for your prompt reply and updates.
I will stick to Fedora 11 at the moment until Fedora 16 or later.
Thank you very much.
Yours sincerely,
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Citizenship: Singapore Citizen/Singaporean
Facebook account:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id
Dear Kevin Fenzi,
Michael Young has already replied.
Thank you very much.
Yours sincerely,
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Citizenship: Singapore Citizen/Singaporean
Facebook account:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10750083982
Location: Bedok Reservoir Road, Singapore 470103
My Open L
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote:
> I will stick to Fedora 11 at the moment until Fedora 16 or later.
Uh, Fedora 11 is not supported anymore and it also never had a Xen Dom0
kernel, pvops or otherwise. The last Fedora release to ship a Xen Dom0
kernel was Fedora 8, and that was
Dear Kevin Kofler,
You may wish to check out my Youtube videos at
http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo for my Xen pv-ops Dom0 kernels and
also VGA passthrough which were implemented in my Fedora 11 x86_64 home
multimedia desktop tower system (at the time of this writing, there are
20 uploaded
28 matches
Mail list logo
