Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

Meeting at our regular time and location! When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST) Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers Please join us. Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss: 621102 :: NEW :: udev :: Harald Hoyer :: The installer doesn't use packages repository in DVD as default :: ht

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 Available Now!

Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all

Re: root-doc subpackage slightly obese

On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Yaah -- so if it's useful documentation, then I'd be against creating a rule > that bans it.  The next question would be whether it's useful or not > Public vs private certainly sounds like one thing to look at.  However, some > libraries might

Re: Removing branch for package without ACL permission

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2010 04:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > I have a commit access but ACL to SDL package. I have created new branch > on the server accidentally. I'd like to remove it, however I'm denied to > do it: > > $ git push origin :origin/f13 > re

Re: git branch help?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2010 12:39 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> But I guess git >> will be storing a lot of redundant stuff and forcing extra pulls if you work >> that way. :-( > > It looks like the current

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/05/2010 03:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Is there any essential difference between 'fedpkg push' and plain > 'git push'? At the moment no, however to work around the local branches being named differently than the remote branches, I've been

Re: dist-git tag question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2010 04:04 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Apologies if this was asked for and answered in another thread, I lost > overview. Ralf and Kevin made me realise something that I have > misinterpreted initially in regards to how packages are tagged now

<    1   2