On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
> Digimer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
>> sure where to turn at this point, so if this isn't the right list, would
>> anyone be able
On 18 June 2010 18:38, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> Hello, all!
>
> And the foundations and first floors of this skyscraper is Zope2 and its
> dependencies, which I have built up. The latest version of Zope2 is 2.12.7.
>
> All the spec files are accessible through my git repo:
> http://fedorapeople.
On 06/19/2010 09:21 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On 18 June 2010 18:38, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
>
>> Hello, all!
>>
>> And the foundations and first floors of this skyscraper is Zope2 and its
>> dependencies, which I have built up. The latest version of Zope2 is 2.12.7.
>>
>> All the spec files
On 19 June 2010 19:31, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> On 06/19/2010 09:21 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
[..]
> In rpmfusion, Zope is an out-dated version, 2.10.x, which works with
> Python 2.4 only.
>
> My package here is the latest version of Zope, 2.12.7, which works with
> Python 2.6, and so no compat-p
2010/6/20 Rakesh Pandit :
>
> Thanks for clarification. I will see whether I can help with some
> dependencies and zope3 part (review as well).
>
> --
> --
The original zope/plone in Fedora/EPEL bundles dozens of third party
python modules, nearly all of those modules need review if we want to
rev
Hello to all.
The subject package is currently orphaned and I'm thinking of taking it
over.
One problem I can foresee is that, as far as I can tell, there's no longer
an upstream maintainer and at least one patch is required to fix compilation
issues (warnings) and the code needs a general tidy-u
On 19 June 2010 22:01, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/20 Rakesh Pandit :
>>
>> Thanks for clarification. I will see whether I can help with some
>> dependencies and zope3 part (review as well).
>>
>> --
>> --
>
> The original zope/plone in Fedora/EPEL bundles dozens of third party
> python modules, nearl
Hi all,
a new version of Hatari has recently been released:
http://hatari.berlios.de/
The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now
it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with
the emulator. Moreover some static libraries have been introduced and
2010/6/20 Andrea Musuruane :
> Hi all,
> a new version of Hatari has recently been released:
> http://hatari.berlios.de/
>
> The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now
> it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with
> the emulator. Moreover some
lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane:
> I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should
> I package them? Because upstream uses static libraries the dynamic
> versions cmake creates are not versioned.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#
I want to takeover the ownership of the subject package, however, I don't seem
to be able to do so from within the package database.
Can anyone please advise?
Thanks.
Ian--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:37:17AM +0100, ianrichardba...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to takeover the ownership of the subject package, however, I don't seem
> to be able to do so from within the package database.
>
> Can anyone please advise?
>
It's currently orphaned so that looks okay. What's y
Username is chameleon, and I am a new contributor so I don't yet have
sponsorship.
Thanks for replying.
Ian
- Reply message -
From: "Toshio Kuratomi"
Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 02:28
Subject: Ownership of DMity
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:3
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
> > be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
> > would be ideal for ge
On 20 June 2010 07:40, ianrichardbaker wrote:
> Username is chameleon, and I am a new contributor so I don't yet have
> sponsorship.
>
[..]
Read:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
You will need sponsor
Thanks for your reply.
I had read the Wiki page, but there's no mention of new contributors adopting
orphaned packages.
So I have to submit the orphan as new all over again in order to kickstart the
new contributor process?
Thanks.
Ian
- Reply message -
From: "Rakesh Pandit"
Date
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
> legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
We have a unique opportunity to address many of the failings of the
current zope namespace. We should get anyone interested (and
On 20 June 2010 09:47, ianrichardbaker wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I had read the Wiki page, but there's no mention of new contributors
> adopting orphaned packages.
>
Ok.
> So I have to submit the orphan as new all over again in order to kickstart
> the new contributor process?
>
[..]
I
On 20 June 2010 10:10, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
[..]
>
> In case this package has not been update since last 3 months you can
> resubmit it for review. But if it has been updated recently (in last 3
> months) you will have to get sponsored first and then later claim it
> (or ask for co-maintainership i
On 06/20/2010 12:22 AM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
>> The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
>> legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
>
> We have a unique opportunity to address many of the failings of the
> curre
On 10-06-19 12:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
>Digimer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
>> sure where to turn at this point, so if this isn't the right list, would
>> anyone be able to point
On 10-06-19 08:51 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
>> Digimer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
>>> sure where to turn at this point, so i
22 matches
Mail list logo
