2010/6/11 Stu Tomlinson :
>> At least it causes package-manager to display an irritating (and
>> somehow bogus) warning box that it's going to remove pidgin, and needs
>> confirmation for that.
>
> I'm not sure which "package-manager" this is, but I suggest the fix is
> to make "package-manager" no
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:15:55 +0200, Thomas wrote:
> Meant to write "PackageKit". And this is surely a PackageKit bug.
>
> Today this happened again, for the awn-extras-applets package, which
> also self-obsoletes: % rpm -q --obsoletes awn-extras-applets
> awn-extras-applets-devel < 0.4.0-14.fc13
2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request?
>> Is there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I'd like to remember that there are *many* upstreams are going to
> resistant to this change. A lot of upstream projects need to be
> compatible to a lot of Linux and Unix systems, even old ones, so
> before they move they want guarantee that this is rea
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Not very long multiplied by cold caches, and memory allocations and
> frees, etc. The problem isn't that awk is launched, is that it's
> launched a 100 times along with grep, cut, whatever kind of sticks and
> strings you can get in shell text processin
Compose started at Fri Jun 11 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
blender-2.49b-6.fc13.i686 req
Today, a candle burns on php-captchaphp review request's 1st birthday
cake: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354
Everyone who wants to celebrate is kindly invited there :-)
More seriously: this package is born from unbundling parts of
WebCalendar (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-06-11/fedora-releng.2010-06-11-17.04.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-06-11/fedora-releng.2010-06-11-17.04.txt
og:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-06-11/f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592101
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-11
15:20:36 EDT ---
mldonkey-3.0.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for
On Thu 10 June 2010 2:44:47 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will rep
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-13 00:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-13 00:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Network work and testing will be goi
I am no longer using several packages that I have maintained and will
be orphaning them. Some need love, others I just don't use anymore.
kflickr
php-pear-Phlickr
pastebin
x2vnc
Most have very limited upstream movement, but again, I don't use them anymore.
stahnma
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 12:46 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> How will this affect current packagers' workflow? Will the changes necessary
> be documented on the wiki? It doesn't seem straight off the bat that this
> would be a drop-in replacement without packagers needing to tweak their
> workflow.
>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:09:41 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
> With dist-git it's slightly different:
>
> fedpkg clone
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On 11/06/10 17:54, Patrick Monnerat wrote:
>
> Today, a candle burns on php-captchaphp review request's 1st birthday
> cake: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354
> Everyone who wants to celebrate is kindly invited there :-)
--snip--
>
> Thanks in advance to the reviewer of this ve
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
> Or can regular git be used ?
>
>
Not necessary at all. The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like
I have created a detailed schedule for the Release Engineering team and
development for Fedora 14. The contents of this schedule will also
drive the weekly schedule reminders that go to development and releng.
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-releng-tasks.html
Please let me
On 06/11/2010 05:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 11/06/10 17:54, Patrick Monnerat wrote:
>>
>> Today, a candle burns on php-captchaphp review request's 1st birthday
>> cake: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354
>> Everyone who wants to celebrate is kindly invited there :-)
> --snip-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> ssh://.
Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for pushes) too?
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
19 matches
Mail list logo
