Evolution 2.31.2-2 - lots of issues

Hi, Is anyone else having issues with Ev 2.31.2-2? Currently, it's refusing to expunge files (I've removed the usual culprits, but still nada), it's refusing to preview emails and quite enjoys crashing with a segmentation fault. If I double click on a message, a window appears with nothing in it.

rawhide report: 20100606 changes

Compose started at Sun Jun 6 08:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 bugzilla-3.6-1.fc14.noarch re

Re: Evolution 2.31.2-2 - lots of issues

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone else having issues with Ev 2.31.2-2? > > Currently, it's refusing to expunge files (I've removed the usual > culprits, but still nada), it's refusing to preview emails and quite > enjoys crashing with a segmentation fault. If I doubl

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On 3 June 2010 07:44, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thursday 03 June 2010, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:05 +0100, Mat Booth wrote: >> > It doesn't even know all English words. In one review I did recently >> > rpmlint flagged the word "decryption" as a spelling error. Which I >> >

initscripts-9.12-1.fc13 update not installable

The update conflicts with NetworkManager; there is a NetworkManager build for F13 from a few days after initscripts was build that, for some reason, was never pushed as an update: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172856 Are these two updates supposed to go together? I download

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

Hi, Thanks for this. Just a couple of points: The package name is converted to lower case. Should it be doing that? For example, the jFormatString opt-in files are in /srv/people/site/packages/j/jformatstring. Also autoqa-optin doesn't validate the package name: I missed it out at one point and

Re: culmus-fonts packaging bug / Non-responsive maintainer

Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 13:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:12:08 +0900, Mamoru wrote: > > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/570819 > > > I will vote that this must be fixed in yum side (or fontconfig or rpm). > > It could be that a policy is needed. Similar to >

Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 18:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > Handling this with systemd is very easy: you can just drop in a file in > /etc/init.d/foo *AND* /etc/systemd/system/foo.service from the same > package. And then, if something that is not systemd is booted it will > only see t

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Richard Fearn wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for this. > > Just a couple of points: > > The package name is converted to lower case. Should it be doing that? > For example, the jFormatString opt-in files are in > /srv/people/site/packages/j/jformatstring. > As

Package Review Stats for last week ending 6th June

Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 6th June were Alexander Kurtakov, Stanislav Ochotnicky and Daiki Ueno. Alexander Kurtakov : 11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590679 xmltool ht

Re: Package Review Stats for last week ending 6th June

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package > review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 6th June were > Alexander Kurtakov, Stanislav Ochotnicky and Daiki Ueno. Thank you for extending the script to include