On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rawhide Report wrote:
> > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > ---
> > * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> > - Rebuild for protobuf ABI change
> > - Added redhat-lsb to the Requires for murmur
>
> As already noted by Rah
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -AdamM (from Android )
>>
>> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>>
On 21 May 2010 02:29, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> What's next? Dumping the data into the same binary as the infamous registry
> does?
Dude, this doesn't fit with the "be excellent to each other" ideology.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 02:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Just stick by it. The next version of yelp will use webkit.
>
> But webkitgtk is still an extraneous dependency of significant size on the
> KDE spin.
The question is why do you ship GTK+ apps on the KDE spin then
Peter Robinson wrote:
> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about.
In fact this is a big failure of our feature process, but wheneve
Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
interface are rather hard to reproduce on GNOME.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: sali...@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: 78884778
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What happens if we want to run the /usr/bin/lsb_release command?
Check /etc/redhat-release (which is a symlink to fedora-release, centos-
release etc. on the relevant systems) instead?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Looking at existing practice, nothing too interesting. Look at ksycoca,
> it does something very similar.
But the sycoca doesn't actually operate on config files. Yes, the "co"
stands for "configuration", but the "system configuration cache" is
basically a database of inf
* Only three packages fixed since April 1st.
* 20 packages left to be fixed.
* No new violations since February.
* Bugzilla status for packages violating the Static Library guidelines:
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/staticbugstat.html
acl 556036 -> CLOSE
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> The question is why do you ship GTK+ apps on the KDE spin then, not how
> to cripple GTK+ apps's help.
Because we want our spin to be installable? The liveinst executable is part
of the anaconda package, which requires a lot of GTK+-based stuff, even
metacity (something I
On Friday 21 May 2010 11:21:49 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
> interface are rather hard to reproduce on GNOME.
Hi,
it's fair to co-maintain google-gadget as we're one of consumers, count me in.
I've already asked for ACLS.
Ja
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Friday 21 May 2010 11:21:49 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
>> interface are rather hard to reproduce on GNOME.
>
> Hi,
> it's fair to co-maintain google-gadget as we'
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 21. 05. 2010 v 11:27 +0200:
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Looking at existing practice, nothing too interesting. Look at ksycoca,
> > it does something very similar.
>
> But the sycoca doesn't actually operate on config files. Yes, the "co"
> stands for "configuration", but
Dne 21.5.2010 11:30, Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> The question is why do you ship GTK+ apps on the KDE spin then, not how
>> to cripple GTK+ apps's help.
>
> Because we want our spin to be installable? The liveinst executable is part
> of the anaconda package, which requires a
Compose started at Fri May 21 08:15:34 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592798
Pinging here because maintainer seems unresponsive.
Verification (or not) would be good too.
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Friday 21 May 2010 13:00:54 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
wrote:
> > On Friday 21 May 2010 11:21:49 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
> >> interface are rather hard to repro
Kevin Kofler said the following on 05/21/2010 02:21 AM Pacific Time:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:40:00AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>Instead of continuing to beat the same same horse you've killed a 100
>times over on this list, have you considered looking for another distro
>or community project that is more aligned with your wishes and goals?
I second this.
jo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 05/21/2010 05:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about.
>
> In fact this
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 01:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > A solution, flags!
>
> Well, we should carefully consider the disadvantages of that change.
Which is why I posted it to the list, for discussion.
> For
> example, one thing we will lose with a flag-based solution
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
>> I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell
>> script.
>> Is there some variant of %include or similar?
>
> AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once
Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 23:30:18, Ville-Pekka Vainio a écrit :
> to, 2010-05-20 kello 21:11 +0200, Alain Portal kirjoitti:
> > How stupid I am, this isn't the problem I wanted to report.
> > Here is the real one:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2199881
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> > statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
> > mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement abo
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:22:28AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > What happens if we want to run the /usr/bin/lsb_release command?
>
> Check /etc/redhat-release (which is a symlink to fedora-release, centos-
> release etc. on the relevant systems) instead?
Well, funnil
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:47 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> > > statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > I'm not sure we need to push it all the way into F13, but a special WebM
> > repo would be nice so this can be easily tested by any user on F13
> > systems in preparation for full 'support' in F14.
>
> Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:47 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> > > statement
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 20:21 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look at the patent-freeness of
> > WebM before we leap to include it? We don't take other people's word for
> > it in most cases of potential patent problems, so I don't think it
> > follows that
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:25:00PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> If you are receiving this email then you are listed as the owner of a
> mailing list hosted by the fedora project. We've had a lot of messages
> sitting in the heldmsg queue in mailman. This is where messages that are
It has nothing to do with disk space. Sitting on a few hundred thousand spam
messages for no reason, that'll get ignored forever, and that slow mailman
down, serves no purpose.
If moderators want to actually moderate their lists for spam and
non-subscribers, they're welcome to do so. But to b
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:25:00PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> If you are receiving this email then you are listed as the owner of a
>> mailing list hosted by the fedora project. We've had a lot of messages
>> sitting in the heldm
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > > ---
> > > * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> > > - Rebuild for protobuf ABI chang
34 matches
Mail list logo
